<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with website and BBC</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/website+BBC</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'website' and 'BBC' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:52:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:52:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>You are here.  Do you have your towel?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36606/You%2Dare%2Dhere%2DDo%2Dyou%2Dhave%2Dyour%2Dtowel</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hitchhikers/game.shtml"&gt;The 20th Anniversary Edition of the Hitchhiker&apos;s Guide to the Galaxy&lt;/a&gt; text adventure is online, and the BBC has jazzed it up.  A bit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36606</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:52:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>game</category>
		<category>Hitchhikersguide</category>
		<category>textadventure</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>WolfDaddy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No more virtual Auntie Beeb?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27892/No%2Dmore%2Dvirtual%2DAuntie%2DBeeb</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The BBC&apos;s Website&lt;/a&gt; is currently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.culture.gov.uk/global/consultations/2003+current+consultations/cons_bbci_review.htm&quot;&gt;under review&lt;/a&gt;, and the public is requested to give their opinion.  With the &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/story/0,7496,1029616,00.html&quot;&gt;Tories saying they would shut the website down&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,7521,1028124,00.html&quot;&gt;BSkyB demanding that they sell off their best shows&lt;/a&gt;, and rival networks describing their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/&quot;&gt;annual report&lt;/a&gt; as &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,7521,999755,00.html&quot;&gt;extremely vague about spending&lt;/a&gt; (not to mention the entire &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/27108&quot;&gt;David&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/27072&quot;&gt;Kelly&lt;/a&gt; fiasco...), it seems as though a review of the website might be more or less ignored by the public. (Personal opinion inside...)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27892</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:23:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>review</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>Katemonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23685/New%2DBBC%2DNews</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk"&gt;The BBC&apos;s News website&lt;/a&gt; has undergone a re-design. The primary change is the switch from using a 640x480 based design to a 800x600 design. BBC News Online&apos;s Editor-in-Chief explains their reasons for the change &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2761877.stm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
What do MeFi users think of the re-design? Personally, I find it&apos;s a little CNN-esque and I&apos;m not totally convinced.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23685</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:04:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>metaxa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The BBC&apos;s virtual monopoly must end (must it?)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22690/The%2DBBCs%2Dvirtual%2Dmonopoly%2Dmust%2Dend%2Dmust%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,869125,00.html"&gt;Is the BBCi website far too big and monopolistic?&lt;/a&gt; Editorial from &apos;The Guardian&apos; discussing whether the BBC&apos;s website, funded by the British license fee is taking the thunder away from commercial websites worldwide trying to achieve the same results in advertising run market place.  There is some logic to the argument -- when e-marketing revenues are dwingling how can some sites compete with this bohemoth?  On the other hand, if they were achieving the same results people would be going to them instead, and the BBC&apos;s website is very, very good in some places, indispensible in others.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22690</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


