<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with website and Redesign</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/website+Redesign</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'website' and 'Redesign' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:55:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:55:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Apple.com to be redesigned by Zeldman, Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27921/Applecom%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dredesigned%2Dby%2DZeldman%2DBowman</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.macminute.com/2003/08/27/apple"&gt;Apple.com to be redesigned by Zeldman, Bowman&lt;/a&gt; Apple has contracted Jeffrey Zeldman of Happy Cog Studios and Douglas Bowman of Stopdesign to collaborate on a redesign of the company&apos;s Web site. Congratulations!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27921</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:55:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>Bowman</category>
		<category>DouglasBowman</category>
		<category>JeffreyZeldman</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>Zeldman</category>
		<dc:creator>dilokiam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The BBC&apos;s virtual monopoly must end (must it?)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22690/The%2DBBCs%2Dvirtual%2Dmonopoly%2Dmust%2Dend%2Dmust%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,869125,00.html"&gt;Is the BBCi website far too big and monopolistic?&lt;/a&gt; Editorial from &apos;The Guardian&apos; discussing whether the BBC&apos;s website, funded by the British license fee is taking the thunder away from commercial websites worldwide trying to achieve the same results in advertising run market place.  There is some logic to the argument -- when e-marketing revenues are dwingling how can some sites compete with this bohemoth?  On the other hand, if they were achieving the same results people would be going to them instead, and the BBC&apos;s website is very, very good in some places, indispensible in others.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22690</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18784/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.parliament.uk/"&gt;The UK Parliament Site &lt;/a&gt; gets a new design, with live webcasting. They want it better to serve &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/openup/story/0,11872,765625,00.html&quot;&gt;&quot;grazers&quot; as well as &quot;hunters&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. For comparison, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/&quot;&gt;US House&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.assemblee-nat.fr/english/index.asp&quot;&gt;French Assembly&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senat.fr/english/somm.html&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt;.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18784</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 06:37:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Government</category>
		<category>Parliment</category>
		<category>Redesign</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>Website</category>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13136/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://frwebgate6.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=363462192967+0+0+0&amp;amp;WAISaction=retrieve"&gt;Want to redesign the Senate Web site?&lt;/a&gt; The Senate is soliciting proposals for a new CMS and complete overhaul of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/&quot;&gt;current site&lt;/a&gt;, which hasn&apos;t changed much (or added many features) lately. It does not include individual senators&apos; or committees&apos; sites.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13136</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:05:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>thescoop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11900/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057573&amp;amp;device="&gt;If you crow about your redesign,&lt;/a&gt; claiming your site is now &quot;better-looking and easier to use&quot; (and not, say, &quot;sludgy as Hotmail and nearly as ugly&quot;), and you offer a &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057522&quot; title=&quot;It didn&apos;t work for hours&quot;&gt;graphical tour&lt;/a&gt; to &quot;show you how all these slick new features work&quot;, the link to which is a 404, are you the stupidest monopoly around?

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondering.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11900</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>404</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>textist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5510/</link>
		<description> Two of the biggest tech news sites seem to be coming up a little short in the creativity department. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/&quot;&gt;ZDNet&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com/&quot;&gt;CNet News&lt;/a&gt; have both been redesigned recently, and their new similarities are astounding. Worse still, they both now feature &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4606555.html?tag=mn_hd&quot;&gt;huge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2678884,00.html&quot;&gt;ugly&lt;/a&gt; ads (which we&apos;re supposed to &quot;explore&quot;) that completely overwhelm the page.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5510</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:40:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cnet</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>websitedesign</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>fraying</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3619/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.weblogs.com"&gt;Change of scenery.&lt;/a&gt; Weblogs.com has had a serious overhaul. What does this group of rag-tag critics think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3619</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:46:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>Weblogs.com</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>Neale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/384/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hotwired.com/webmonkey/"&gt;I&apos;ve always liked webmonkey,&lt;/a&gt; it&apos;s been one of the finest resources available, but with their recent redesign I can&apos;t seem to find things as quickly as I used to. Plus I can&apos;t find a link anywhere on the site to their &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.hotwired.com/webmonkey/radio/&apos;&gt;Webmonkey Radio feature&lt;/a&gt;. Once a month or so, I remember it exists, and I have to physically type &quot;/radio&quot; after webmonkey.com to see it. I missed a couple episodes, so now I&apos;ve got some webmonkey-radio-catching-up to do.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.384</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1999 23:29:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>webmonkey</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/363/</link>
		<description> Hmm...this is weird. Recently, RealNetworks split their site into two distinct sites. &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.real.com/&apos;&gt;Real.com&lt;/a&gt; caters to the general internet user and focuses mainly on the new RealPlayer 7 (which I didn&apos;t even know came out this month), and they&apos;ve moved all their content creation stuff to &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.realnetworks.com/&apos;&gt;RealNetworks.com&lt;/a&gt;. What I find odd about this is I&apos;m used to their old unified site, so when I stumbled upon an article about the new player at Realnetworks.com, I couldn&apos;t find any place to download the new player. They don&apos;t even mention it on their &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.realnetworks.com/products/index.html&apos;&gt;products page&lt;/a&gt;!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.363</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:40:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>RealNetworks</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


