<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with website and design</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/website+design</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'website' and 'design' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:12:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:12:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Giving a face to biodiversity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56191/Giving%2Da%2Dface%2Dto%2Dbiodiversity</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.findingspecies.org/"&gt;Finding Species&lt;/a&gt; is an organization that integrates science, photography, and design to create standardized methods of photo-documenting &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.nbii.gov/fs_amazon.php&quot;&gt;plants&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.nbii.gov/fs_geckos.php&quot;&gt;animals&lt;/a&gt;, for use in print and web field guides, educational exhibits, and conservation campaigns.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56191</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:12:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biodiversity</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>fieldguides</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>owhydididoit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wednesday Flash Design Fun</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51204/Wednesday%2DFlash%2DDesign%2DFun</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.leoburnett.com/"&gt;Leo Burnett Ad Agency&lt;/a&gt; - A pretty cool site, and, says this rank amateur, the best implementation of Flash I&apos;ve ever seen (and I hate Flash).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51204</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cool</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>loquax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Usability frogs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50930/Usability%2Dfrogs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://frogreview.com/"&gt;Frog Review&lt;/a&gt; - Talking frogs review websites.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50930</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:26:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>frogs</category>
		<category>hci</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>worldwideweb</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>carter</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23685/New%2DBBC%2DNews</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk"&gt;The BBC&apos;s News website&lt;/a&gt; has undergone a re-design. The primary change is the switch from using a 640x480 based design to a 800x600 design. BBC News Online&apos;s Editor-in-Chief explains their reasons for the change &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2761877.stm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
What do MeFi users think of the re-design? Personally, I find it&apos;s a little CNN-esque and I&apos;m not totally convinced.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23685</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:04:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>metaxa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The BBC&apos;s virtual monopoly must end (must it?)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22690/The%2DBBCs%2Dvirtual%2Dmonopoly%2Dmust%2Dend%2Dmust%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,869125,00.html"&gt;Is the BBCi website far too big and monopolistic?&lt;/a&gt; Editorial from &apos;The Guardian&apos; discussing whether the BBC&apos;s website, funded by the British license fee is taking the thunder away from commercial websites worldwide trying to achieve the same results in advertising run market place.  There is some logic to the argument -- when e-marketing revenues are dwingling how can some sites compete with this bohemoth?  On the other hand, if they were achieving the same results people would be going to them instead, and the BBC&apos;s website is very, very good in some places, indispensible in others.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22690</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15679/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://warriorsofchrist.com/resources/design3.shtml"&gt;10 Deadly Web Site Design Sins...&lt;/a&gt; according to the Warriors of Christ, the blink tag is officially evil.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15679</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:13:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Design</category>
		<category>WebSite</category>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15175/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wildmag.de/compo.php"&gt;1/20th the size of 5k: the 256b competition&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Most won&apos;t work on anything but Win/IE5+, and you have to download the (65.2Kb) .&lt;a href=&quot;http://wildmag.de/256b_htm_voting_package.zip&quot;&gt;zip file&lt;/a&gt;, but ... wow.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15175</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:28:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>256b</category>
		<category>5k</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>HTML</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>sylloge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11900/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057573&amp;amp;device="&gt;If you crow about your redesign,&lt;/a&gt; claiming your site is now &quot;better-looking and easier to use&quot; (and not, say, &quot;sludgy as Hotmail and nearly as ugly&quot;), and you offer a &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057522&quot; title=&quot;It didn&apos;t work for hours&quot;&gt;graphical tour&lt;/a&gt; to &quot;show you how all these slick new features work&quot;, the link to which is a 404, are you the stupidest monopoly around?

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondering.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11900</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>404</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>textist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10894/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.frogsonice.com/froggy/"&gt;The Froggy Page&lt;/a&gt; was the &lt;a href=&quot;http://coolsiteoftheday.com/&quot;&gt;Cool Site of the Day&lt;/a&gt; from August 8, 1994. It&apos;s the oldest site archived there without the disclaimer, &quot;site no longer live&quot;. The page sure looks like it was built in &apos;94 -- not even a single table! (Can anyone who was coding back then confirm if the code is really that old?) Does anyone have a favorite site from those good old days?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10894</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:10:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1994</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>FroggyPage</category>
		<category>frogs</category>
		<category>HTML</category>
		<category>old</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7572/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/"&gt;The new Webmonkey redesign&lt;/a&gt; is slick. Liquid width, CSS positioned boxes (hacked z-index and negative margins to get those overlapping boxes is my guess), easter eggs on the logo, and now a frontdoor split based on skill level. Although this design doesn&apos;t lend itself well to their more text heavy subpages, I&apos;d prefer to see a bit more integration than the new on the front and old look inside (the splash of white from every link off the main page is a bit much).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7572</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2001 12:06:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>Webmonkey</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5510/</link>
		<description> Two of the biggest tech news sites seem to be coming up a little short in the creativity department. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/&quot;&gt;ZDNet&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com/&quot;&gt;CNet News&lt;/a&gt; have both been redesigned recently, and their new similarities are astounding. Worse still, they both now feature &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4606555.html?tag=mn_hd&quot;&gt;huge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2678884,00.html&quot;&gt;ugly&lt;/a&gt; ads (which we&apos;re supposed to &quot;explore&quot;) that completely overwhelm the page.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5510</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:40:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cnet</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>websitedesign</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>fraying</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5390/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov"&gt;Welcome to a new era of drop shadows.&lt;/a&gt; Ever since Gore conceded, I was curious about the transition of the White House site. And, um, it&apos;s a little sparse right now. Did anyone catch what time it went live?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5390</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4412/</link>
		<description> Steal a design, win an award. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sumerset.com&quot;&gt;Sumerset Custom Houseboats&lt;/a&gt; won several awards in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inc.com/incmagazine/article/0,,ART21013,00.HTML&quot;&gt;2000 Inc. Magazine Web Awards 2000&lt;/a&gt;, including the top prize in the General Excellence category. According to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sumerset.com/incwa2k.htm&quot;&gt;company press release&lt;/a&gt;, the site was chosen for its &quot;simple, functional, yet elegant design&quot;. The only problem is, they stole the design from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibm.com&quot;&gt;IBM&apos;s site&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4412</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>award</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>IBM</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>SumersetHouseboats</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>jkottke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3329/</link>
		<description> I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sylloge.com&quot;&gt;this site&lt;/a&gt;, but it looks an awful lot like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;this other site&lt;/a&gt;. Have you no respect for the property of others, Stewart? Must you steal to make yourself feel good?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3329</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:51:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>lookalike</category>
		<category>ripoff</category>
		<category>StewartButterfield</category>
		<category>tongueincheek</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>ericost</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2874/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.burningman.com/"&gt;The Burning Man website&lt;/a&gt; has undergone a massive redesign, it seems. Much better than before, and with only 12 days left to BM2K. I could cry, really... I can&apos;t make it this year, nor did I make it to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defcon.org/&quot;&gt;Defcon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hope.net/&quot;&gt;H2K&lt;/a&gt;, or any other gather. 

Bring back stories from the fire for me, people.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2874</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2000 20:56:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BurnngMan</category>
		<category>convention</category>
		<category>desert</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


