<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with websites and blogs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/websites+blogs</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'websites' and 'blogs' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:39:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:39:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The First 100 Days</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78518/The%2DFirst%2D100%2DDays</link>
		<description> Oh those vaunted &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal#The_First_Hundred_Days&quot;&gt;first 100 days&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; they are finally upon us.  Roosevelt&apos;s legendary time period has long been applied to new administrations, but never so emphatically or with such hope as to the Obama administration.  And now you can follow them!  For commentary, there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefirst100days.org/&quot;&gt;The First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;, for mainstream media there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/obama-100-days/&quot;&gt;Obama&apos;s First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;, for a comparison between old and new there &lt;a href=&quot;http://100days.blogs.nytimes.com/&quot;&gt;100 Days: Starting the Job, From FDR to Obam&lt;/a&gt;a, for new media there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/100-days&quot;&gt;Obama&apos;s First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;, and finally, for a government perspective there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.america.gov/campaign/&quot;&gt;First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;.

I smell an idea for an ironic t-shirt...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78518</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:39:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>100days</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>deal</category>
		<category>fdr</category>
		<category>first100days</category>
		<category>followingobama</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>hundreddays</category>
		<category>new</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>obamaadministration</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>Cochise</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hatred via weblog.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28985/Hatred%2Dvia%2Dweblog</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jewishinternetassociation.org/jia_weblog.php"&gt;Hatred via weblog.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jewishinternetassociation.org/&quot;&gt;Jewish Internet Association&lt;/a&gt;, a tax-exempt, non-profit California corporation, considers the Internet a battleground, where &quot;every channel must be utilized to resist and convert others to our defense and support.&quot; A whois showed they have the same mailing address as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palestinefacts.org&quot;&gt;palestinefacts.org&lt;/a&gt;. However, examining &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jewishinternetassociation.org/jia_weblog.php&quot;&gt;their weblog&lt;/a&gt; reveals an agenda that is every bit as hateful as Hamas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
From a recent entry: 
&lt;em&gt;&quot;The Palestinian Arabs go through a pretense of having a government&quot; .... &quot;This must end. In the past the only way such murderous, bastard regimes have ended was through massive destruction of their people and lands.&quot; .... &quot;The same process will be required to end the fraudulant &quot;peace process&quot; and come to the point where there can be a new start.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The JIA site links to a guide for &lt;a href=&quot;http://haganah.org.il/resources/howto/&quot;&gt;shutting down offensive websites&lt;/a&gt;. Do you think the same techniques would work against them too?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28985</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:01:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>hate</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Israel</category>
		<category>Jewish</category>
		<category>JewishInternetAssociation</category>
		<category>Jews</category>
		<category>JIA</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>Palestine</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16108/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microcontentnews.com/entries/20020405-623.htm"&gt;&lt;i&gt;WebLogs bring less traffic than major media sites. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; There isn&apos;t any surprize there, but what &lt;i&gt;kind&lt;/i&gt; of traffic does each bring?&lt;blockquote&gt;...those Google/Scientology articles I wrote didn&apos;t get nearly as many links from blogs... but they were of much broader interest to readers than the blog articles, so when a few major media sites linked to them, they got a ton of traffic.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  Major media sites have to appeal to a common denominator, while smaller sites (MeFi) can focus on quality and thought provoking content.  Is there any wonder there&apos;s less people interested in the specifics?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16108</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 06:22:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<category>webtraffic</category>
		<dc:creator>KnitWit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5432/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fairvue.com/?feature=awards2001"&gt;One wo/man; many, many votes.&lt;/a&gt; From the seventh circle of hell comes the second-last sign of the apocalypse; the voting form for the bloggies. I know which site I voted for... you&apos;re reading the damn thing right now. Go MeFi!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5432</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:19:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awards</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>bloggies</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>votes</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>Neale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3211/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-2750439.html"&gt;For Sale: FuckedCompany.com.&lt;/a&gt; What do think the person who &lt;a href=&quot;http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=434391456&quot;&gt;buys it&lt;/a&gt; will do with the site?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3211</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2000 10:56:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>fuckedcompany</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


