<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wellbeing</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wellbeing</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wellbeing' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:05:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:05:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Aaron Beck &amp;amp; Cognitive Therapy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85713/Aaron%2DBeck%2Dand%2DCognitive%2DTherapy</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;&#8220;&lt;a title=&quot;The Doctor Is IN: At 88, Aaron Beck is now revered for an approach to psychotherapy that pushed Freudian analysis aside&quot; href=&quot;http://www.theamericanscholar.org/the-doctor-is-in/print/&quot;&gt;The psychoanalytic mystique&lt;/a&gt; was overwhelming. It was a little bit like the evangelical movement.&#8221;&lt;/i&gt; How &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beckinstitute.org/Library/InfoManage/Zoom.asp?InfoID=304&amp;RedirectPath=Add1&amp;FolderID=208&amp;SessionID={B73CB695-4937-4965-B3F8-4C7CAB864F33}&amp;InfoGroup=Main&amp;InfoType=Article&amp;SP=2&quot;&gt;Aaron Beck&lt;/a&gt; and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy helped increase empiricism in psychotherapy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85713</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:05:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aaronbeck</category>
		<category>aarontbeck</category>
		<category>behaviorism</category>
		<category>behaviourism</category>
		<category>cbt</category>
		<category>cognition</category>
		<category>cognitivebehavioraltherapy</category>
		<category>discipline</category>
		<category>freud</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>mental</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>psychiatry</category>
		<category>psychoanalysis</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>psychotherapy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>therapy</category>
		<category>wellbeing</category>
		<dc:creator>Non Prosequitur</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;All families in OECD countries today are aware that childhood is being reshaped by forces whose mainspring is not necessarily the best interests of the child.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58674/All%2Dfamilies%2Din%2DOECD%2Dcountries%2Dtoday%2Dare%2Daware%2Dthat%2Dchildhood%2Dis%2Dbeing%2Dreshaped%2Dby%2Dforces%2Dwhose%2Dmainspring%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dnecessarily%2Dthe%2Dbest%2Dinterests%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dchild</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/comment/0,,2013377,00.html"&gt;How does your country measure up as a place to raise kids?&lt;/a&gt; It turns out that &lt;i&gt;growing up in the UK is a bleaker experience than in any other wealthy country.&lt;/i&gt; UNICEF studied all the wealthiest nations (full &lt;a href=&quot;http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Society/documents/2007/02/14/UNchildwellbeing.pdf&quot;&gt;report PDF here&lt;/a&gt;), and the US and UK came in at the bottom on almost all indicators (material wellbeing, health and safety, education, family and peer relationships, behaviours and risks, and the subjective feelings of kids and teens themselves ). Doing best for kids were the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Finland. It turns out that GDP and material wealth alone does not ensure healthier or happier or more well-educated kids--the Czech Republic scored very well despite being one of the poorest nations surveyed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58674</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:48:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>global</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>teens</category>
		<category>UNICEF</category>
		<category>wellbeing</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Get your own damn blog, indeed!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40387/Get%2Dyour%2Down%2Ddamn%2Dblog%2Dindeed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2005/03/brain-of-blogger.html"&gt;Blogging is good for your health?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2005/03/03/blogging-is-good-for-your-health/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;] &lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; Despite all the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mama.indstate.edu/users/bones/WhyIHateWebLogs.html&quot;&gt;open hatred&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/websuck.html&quot;&gt;backlash&lt;/a&gt; against online journaling (not to mention an infamous study indicating that diary-keeping could be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6374&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;bad&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; for your health), there may be actual merit to telling someone that they should get their own (damn) blog!&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40387</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>diaries</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>onlinejournals</category>
		<category>weblogs</category>
		<category>wellbeing</category>
		<dc:creator>Lush</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16904/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buffalo.edu/news/fast-execute.cgi/article-page.html?article=56350009&quot;&gt;Homeless street kids&lt;/a&gt; in 3rd world countries &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/news/041002/2.html&quot;&gt;adapt to survive &lt;/a&gt;and are &lt;i&gt;actually healthier and more likely to survive than are their peers who grow up in poor but intact families in agricultural villages. &lt;/i&gt; Experts confounded.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16904</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2002 18:15:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adaptation</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>homeless</category>
		<category>streetkids</category>
		<category>thirdworld</category>
		<category>urchins</category>
		<category>wellbeing</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


