<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with whatthebleep</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/whatthebleep</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'whatthebleep' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:28:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:28:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>there is no dog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37177/there%2Dis%2Dno%2Ddog</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whatthebleep.com/"&gt;What the Bleep Do We Know?&lt;/a&gt; Has anybody else seen this movie, about quantum physics and the nature of reality? We went to see it last night and were flummoxed by the 100-person line sprawling up the sidewalk outside our little downtown art theater. The movie was good, but for the most part didn&apos;t cover anything I hadn&apos;t heard or thought about before. Except for the work of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatthebleep.com/crystals/&quot;&gt;Dr. Masaru Emoto&lt;/a&gt;, whose experiments seem to prove that ice crystals form in different shapes depending on the mood that the water is subjected to.
  As somebody with only the most introductory familiarity with quantum physics, I&apos;m curious to know from people who&apos;ve spent more time around the subject: What do you think (of the theory, and of the movie if you&apos;ve seen it)?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37177</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:28:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>masaruemoto</category>
		<category>whatthebleep</category>
		<dc:creator>damn yankee</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


