<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with whitehouse and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/whitehouse+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'whitehouse' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>More PR...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45859/More%2DPR</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq"&gt;Bush teleconference with troops staged.&lt;/a&gt; Nothing in the article says &lt;i&gt;who&lt;/i&gt; is responsible for organizing the staged question and answer session, The White House, military officials, or others in the defense department. Just that it infact was staged, and that the troops were coached for 45 minutes prior to the actual teleconference. When Bush, in an unscripted move, asked an officer if he had anything to say, he stammered through a sentence, in stark contrast to the well put together responses to all the other questions, thanking the President and saying, &quot;I like you.&quot; More PR from the Bush administration.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45859</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>PublicRelations</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>teleconference</category>
		<category>troops</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>SirOmega</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mouth ajar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39639/Mouth%2Dajar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/la-na-pow15feb15,0,3155150.story?coll=la-home-headlines"&gt;&quot;The Bush administration intervened to argue that their claims should be dismissed&quot;&lt;/a&gt; I seriously can&apos;t believe it. This is &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertolt_Brecht&quot;&gt;Brechtian&lt;/a&gt;. Something has to be missing. This can&apos;t be my government.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39639</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:07:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>compensation</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>LATimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Smedleyman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This is bullshit, I&apos;m retiring.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27452/This%2Dis%2Dbullshit%2DIm%2Dretiring</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16856-2003Aug3.html"&gt;Powell and Armitage Intend to Step Down&lt;/a&gt; The WaPo has reported that Colin Powell and his deputy Richard Armitage intend to vacate their posts in January, 2005.  They allegedly told this to NSA Condi Rice, though the White House--staying true to form--is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-2988515,00.html&quot;&gt;denying&lt;/a&gt; it.  So, is he just getting old, or is he finally sick of all the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26098&quot;&gt;bullshit&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27452</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arimtage</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>condeleezarice</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nixon ordered the Watergate break-in.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27270/Nixon%2Dordered%2Dthe%2DWatergate%2Dbreakin</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20030727/pl_nm/politics_watergate_dc_4"&gt;Nixon Ordered the Watergate Break-in.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Jeb Stuart Magruder, the deputy director of Nixon&apos;s 1972 campaign, revealed in a PBS documentary to air on Wednesday that Nixon personally ordered the bungled break-in at the luxury Watergate Hotel complex.&lt;/em&gt; It took 30 years, but the truth finally comes out.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27270</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:09:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>breakin</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>magruder</category>
		<category>nixon</category>
		<category>richardnixon</category>
		<category>watergate</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>zaelic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We Begin Combing in Five Minutes!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24514/We%2DBegin%2DCombing%2Din%2DFive%2DMinutes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1027-2003Mar20.html"&gt;We Begin Combing in Five Minutes!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;The White House is vowing a strong retaliatory response after the BBC aired live video of President Bush getting his hair coiffed in the Oval Office as he squirmed in his chair and practiced on the teleprompter minutes before Wednesday night&apos;s speech announcing the launch of military operations against Saddam Hussein. &lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s America&apos;s Funniest Outtakes (squirm). But where can we view it?!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24514</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:55:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>grooming</category>
		<category>hairdos</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>sparky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>who is this richard perle guy anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24180/who%2Dis%2Dthis%2Drichard%2Dperle%2Dguy%2Danyway</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030317fa_fact"&gt;who is this richard perle guy anyway?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
is anyone else a little concerned with some of his views and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&amp;c=3&amp;s=vest&quot;&gt;associations&lt;/a&gt; being one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/organizations/foreignpolicy/defense_policy_board.htm&quot;&gt;top advisors&lt;/a&gt; to our current administration?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24180</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advisor</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>NewYorker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RichardPerle</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Former Head of Faith-Based Programs Says Bush White House Not Interested in Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22051/Former%2DHead%2Dof%2DFaithBased%2DPrograms%2DSays%2DBush%2DWhite%2DHouse%2DNot%2DInterested%2Din%2DPolicy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/articles/2002/021202_mfe_diiulio_1.html"&gt;In a long letter to Esquire magazine,&lt;/a&gt;  the former head of Bush&apos;s Office of Faith-Based Programs blasts the White House as having practically no interest or expertise in making sound social policy: &quot;[O]n social policy and related issues, the lack of even basic policy knowledge, and the only casual interest in knowing more, was somewhat breathtaking.&quot;  DiIulio may have a bit of an ax to grind here, but it is still a fascinating look inside the Bush policy-making apparatus.  (The letter was the basis for an article by Ron Suskind in Esquire which is not available online [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.esquire.com/features/articles/2002/021202_mfe_rove.html&quot;&gt;press release here&lt;/a&gt;].  The saga leading to the publication of the letter is recounted in today&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2002/12/index.html#000276&quot;&gt;Tapped&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22051</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:02:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>DiIulio</category>
		<category>Esquire</category>
		<category>FaithBased</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>boltman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Condoms bad!  No sex, good!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21752/Condoms%2Dbad%2DNo%2Dsex%2Dgood</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpcoc143002251nov14,0,7803300.column?coll=ny%2Dviewpoints%2Dheadlines"&gt;White House Wages Stealth War on Condoms&lt;/a&gt; The government is waging a covert war on condoms. Fact sheets on the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the transmission of the AIDS virus have disappeared from government sites.  Right wing activists have been appointed to the the presidential AIDS panel. Government audits of AIDS activist groups who protest these policies have begun.  So, apparently only evil-doers have sex outside of marriage, and they deserve to die horrible deaths.  

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21752</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>condoms</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>rightwing</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19062/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://argument.independent.co.uk/regular_columnists/adrian_hamilton/story.jsp?story=322726"&gt;Regime change required for a rogue nation?&lt;/a&gt; In a soundbite disseminated &lt;a href=&quot;http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/nea/iraq/text/0415wthsrpt.htm&quot;&gt;by the White House&lt;/a&gt; and duly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/03/28/bush.terrorists/&quot;&gt;picked up by the media&lt;/a&gt;, Bush the younger asserted that &quot;the world&apos;s worst leaders&quot; will not be permitted to &quot;harbor and develop the world&apos;s worst weapons.&quot; With the U.S. hinting at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/mar02/31289.asp&quot;&gt;a new, unilateral war effort&lt;/a&gt; abroad and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2002/07-15-2002/vo18no14_suspending.htm&quot;&gt;suspending constitutional rights&lt;/a&gt; at home, Adrian Hamilton writes in the &lt;cite&gt;Independent&lt;/cite&gt; (U.K.), &lt;a href=&quot;http://argument.independent.co.uk/regular_columnists/adrian_hamilton/story.jsp?story=322726&quot;&gt;&quot;The government which is spending by far the most on weapons of mass destruction, and is now planning to raise its budget by an increase greater than the total defence spending of Europe, is, of course, based in Washington.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19062</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:31:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adrianhamilton</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>political</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>regimechange</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>washington</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>xian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17270/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:luWqp-WFBVgC:www.house.gov/burton/RSC/word/Jones3.doc+H.R.+2357&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=4&amp;amp;ie=UTF8"&gt;HR-2357.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The U.S.A. prides itself as being one of the most pluralistic societies on earth, with a stunning variety of houses of worship in many communities. But the right to engage in civic activities, and especially to engage in political speech, is severely curtailed among many faith groups because of the perception that the house of worship will &lt;i&gt;lose its charitable status &lt;/i&gt;if &apos;politics&apos; is discussed.&quot; That may be &lt;a href=&quot;http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27685&quot;&gt;about to change&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17270</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 06:39:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>501c3</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ChurchAndState</category>
		<category>HR-2357</category>
		<category>nonprofit</category>
		<category>PoliticalSpeech</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>aaronshaf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14301/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020130/ap_on_go_co/enron_congress_14"&gt;GOP Will Fight GAO Lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt; Says Orrin Hatch, &quot;the General Accounting Office, shouldn&apos;t be &apos;trying to impose disclosure on internal White House meetings to determine policy. ... If you have to do that, pretty soon there wouldn&apos;t be any meetings.&apos;&quot;

This is going to be a tough move to defend come election time.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14301</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:47:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accountability</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>disclosure</category>
		<category>GAO</category>
		<category>GeneralAccountingOffice</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10849/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010926/us/fleischer_maher_2.html"&gt;White House Reprimands Bill Maher...&lt;/a&gt; Remarking on Bill Maher&apos;s recent (and ill-timed) comments, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said &quot;Americans ... need to watch what they say, watch what they do, and this is not a time for remarks like that; there never is.&apos;&apos;
&lt;p&gt;
Mr Fleischer: there&apos;s never a time for a comment like that from the White House.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10849</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:40:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>AriFleischer</category>
		<category>BillMaher</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>speech</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>silusGROK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8917/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37723-2001Jul9.html"&gt;Bush&lt;/a&gt; is at it again. &lt;br&gt;
Is the fact that he is able to get away with things like this an indication of a backlash against the more &lt;i&gt;open&lt;/i&gt; years of Democrats in the White House?&lt;br&gt;
Is this secretly what the American public wants?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8917</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:38:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Army</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>deal</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Salvation</category>
		<category>SalvationArmy</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>TiggleTaggleTiger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8535/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democrats.org/news/quotes/recent.html"&gt;This White House will Have a Long Memory.....&lt;/a&gt;    &quot;To join the coalition, you must agree to support the Bush energy proposal in its entirety and not to
     lobby for changes to the bill... Should the bill change, you must support the changes in the
     legislation or drop out of the coalition. If you are caught attempting to lobby behind the back of the
     White House, you will be expelled from the coalition. I have been advised that this White House
     &apos;will have a long memory.&apos;&quot; -- Fundraising memo for the Alliance for Energy and Economic
       Growth, a month-old trade group consisting of representatives from the various energy
         industries. The letter puts the admission to the group at &quot;a very low price&quot; of $5,000.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8535</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>brucec</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8030/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13372-2001Jun2.html"&gt;Who&apos;s lying?&lt;/a&gt; The story that wouldn&apos;t die continues. &quot;Most of the incidents described yesterday by White House press secretary Ari Fleischer were said to have occurred in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, adjacent to the White House. Pornographic or obscene greetings were left on 15 telephone lines in the offices of the vice president and White House counsel and in the scheduling and advance offices, Fleischer said. As a precaution, all phones were disabled and reprogrammed, he said.&quot;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

OTOH, the GAO says it &quot;could reach no further conclusions because the White House said it had no written record of damage&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8030</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2001 13:16:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arifleischer</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>eisenhowerbuilding</category>
		<category>eisenhowerexecutiveofficebuilding</category>
		<category>gao</category>
		<category>GovernmentAccountabilityOffice</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presssecretary</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7048/</link>
		<description> Affirmative action seems to be taking root in an unlikely place: the Bush White House. &quot;There&apos;s been talk inside and outside the administration about having no more than half the 484 political positions in the cabinet and agencies go to white males and at least 30 percent to women,&quot; Fred Barnes writes in the conservative &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/magazine/mag_6_30_01/barnes_art_6_30_01.asp&quot;&gt;Weekly Standard&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7048</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:17:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AffirmativeAction</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WeeklyStandard</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5504/</link>
		<description> Whitehouse staffers des-  er, I meant &lt;a href=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeattleTimes.woa/wa/gotoArticle?zsection_id=268448413&amp;text_only=0&amp;slug=prints25&amp;document_id=134262665&gt;Kids love biometrics!&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5504</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:55:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biometrics</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>gluechunk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4981/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52094-2000Dec26.html"&gt;Big Networks &lt;/a&gt; get a slap on the wrist for letting the White House pay for anti-drug scripts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4981</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:16:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>capt.crackpipe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2882/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?function=view&amp;amp;record=141"&gt;Whitehouse staff jailed for being porn-dogs.&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m glad I live in Canada.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2882</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:42:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Bane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


