<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with whitehouse and washingtonpost</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/whitehouse+washingtonpost</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'whitehouse' and 'washingtonpost' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:38:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:38:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A Peek Under the PR Mask</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47278/A%2DPeek%2DUnder%2Dthe%2DPR%2DMask</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/06/30/BL2005063001087.html"&gt;A Peek Under the PR Mask&lt;/a&gt; Once in a blue moon, we actually get a peek under the White House&apos;s public-relations mask, and this morning it comes courtesy of Peter Baker and Dan Balz , whose front-pager in The Washington Post suggests that Bush&apos;s unflagging public confidence about his Iraq policy reflects the work of public opinion researchers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47278</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:38:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>publicrelations</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This is bullshit, I&apos;m retiring.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27452/This%2Dis%2Dbullshit%2DIm%2Dretiring</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16856-2003Aug3.html"&gt;Powell and Armitage Intend to Step Down&lt;/a&gt; The WaPo has reported that Colin Powell and his deputy Richard Armitage intend to vacate their posts in January, 2005.  They allegedly told this to NSA Condi Rice, though the White House--staying true to form--is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-2988515,00.html&quot;&gt;denying&lt;/a&gt; it.  So, is he just getting old, or is he finally sick of all the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26098&quot;&gt;bullshit&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27452</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arimtage</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>condeleezarice</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14207/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42754-2002Jan26.html"&gt;10 Days in September: Inside the War Cabinet &lt;/a&gt; The Washington Post today publishes the first of an eight-part special series, by investigative reporters Dan Balz and Bob Woodward, on the US government&apos;s -- and more specifically, the Bush Administration&apos;s -- initial response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The series is based on interviews with President Bush, Vice President Cheney and many other key officials inside the administration and out, and is supplemented by notes of National Security Council meetings made available to The Washington Post, along with notes taken by multiple participants. &lt;b&gt;This is what journalism at its best is all about...&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14207</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:40:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>bobwoodward</category>
		<category>dickcheney</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>september11</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>verdezza</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7341/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20519-2001Apr29.html"&gt;White House Web Blasted&lt;/a&gt; for poor functionality.  This Washington Post article says nothing about the use of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/mail-developers.html&quot;&gt;electronic e-mail addresses&lt;/a&gt; (as opposed to...), the non-clickable &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/&quot;&gt;e-mail addresses&lt;/a&gt; for the people in the White House, or the strange navigational constructs used.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7341</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 10:09:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>vanderwal</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


