<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with whoops</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/whoops</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'whoops' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:26:46 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:26:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Joint oil ventures with attitiude</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82989/Joint%2Doil%2Dventures%2Dwith%2Dattitiude</link>
		<description> Russia&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazprom&quot;&gt;Gazprom&lt;/a&gt; and Nigeria&apos;s oil company &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nnpcgroup.com/&quot;&gt;NNPC&lt;/a&gt; are forming a joint venture. Hmmmm...what do you call such a thing? GazGeria? Nah, Nigeria should come first. How &apos;bout &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8130334.stm&quot;&gt;NIGAZ&lt;/a&gt;? Perhaps unsurprisingly, some people have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/1010/42/379219.htm&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/news/splat/index.php/news/comments/what_is_the_worst_branding_decision_ever/57043&quot;&gt;problem&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freelanceuk.com/news/3164.shtml&quot;&gt;with&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=92497704794&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82989</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:26:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blunder</category>
		<category>fail</category>
		<category>oops</category>
		<category>whoops</category>
		<dc:creator>codswallop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Smoking Gun scoops the L.A. Times</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70241/Smoking%2DGun%2Dscoops%2Dthe%2DLA%2DTimes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0325081sabatino1.html"&gt;Then again, maybe Puff Daddy wasn&apos;t involved in the shooting of Tupac.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
It looks like the L.A. Times&apos; March 17th story drew upon forged FBI reports created with a prison typewriter by James Sabatino.  The Times is now conducting an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-me-tupac27mar27,1,5918079.story&quot;&gt;internal review&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;The con man, James Sabatino, 31, has long sought to insinuate himself, after the fact, in a series of important hip-hop events, from Shakur&apos;s shooting to the murder of The Notorious B.I.G.. In fact, however, Sabatino was little more than a rap devotee, a wildly impulsive, overweight white kid from Florida whose own father once described him in a letter to a federal judge as &quot;a disturbed young man who needed attention like a drug.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Just the fact that the Smoking Gun has undone the L.A. Times is perhaps even more interesting than the debate over who shot Tupac Shakur.  Chuck Philips, author of the original story in the Times, won a Pulitzer in 1999. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70241</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:28:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>forgery</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>puffdaddy</category>
		<category>tupac</category>
		<category>whoops</category>
		<dc:creator>mecran01</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


