<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with windows and antitrust</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/windows+antitrust</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'windows' and 'antitrust' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Freedom! Horrible, horrible freedom!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82422/Freedom%2DHorrible%2Dhorrible%2Dfreedom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/microsoft/5514948/Microsoft-to-ship-Windows-7-without-Internet-Explorer.html"&gt;Windows 7 will ship without Internet Explorer in Europe&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Microsoft said it made it&#8217;s decision following an anti-trust investigation by the European Union.&quot; &quot;This means that computer manufacturers and users will be free to install Internet Explorer on Windows 7, or not, as they prefer&quot; - Dave Heiner, deputy general counsel for Microsoft.

Related: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/82087/Gang-Bing&quot;&gt;Bing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=64&amp;qpcustom=Bing&amp;sample=41&quot;&gt;(6% market share launch)&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars&quot;&gt;Browser Wars&lt;/a&gt; which are still being &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0&quot;&gt;won by IE&lt;/a&gt; or pretty much a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp&quot;&gt;dead heat&lt;/a&gt; between IE and FF depending on who you sample.

&lt;small&gt;Apple nod: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/browser-wars-continue-apple-claims-11-million-downloads-for-new-safari-in-3-days/&quot;&gt;Safari&apos;s come from behind upset?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82422</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>7</category>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>chrome</category>
		<category>firefox</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>safari</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<category>windows7</category>
		<dc:creator>sloe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15254/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33198-2002Mar3.html"&gt;Microsoft plans &quot;doomsday defense&quot;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Microsoft Corp. plans to argue in court hearings next week that if antitrust sanctions sought by state prosecutors are granted, the company would be forced to pull its latest Windows computer operating systems off the market and be unable to develop new systems.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15254</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2002 12:42:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>doomsday</category>
		<category>doomsdaydefense</category>
		<category>hearings</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<dc:creator>aaronshaf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12423/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011116/tc/microsoft_72.html"&gt;Justice Rejects Microsoft Penalty&lt;/a&gt; &lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;(yahoo news)&lt;/font&gt; The government considered but rejected penalties against Microsoft Corp. in its antitrust case that would have required the company to reveal the secret blueprints to its flagship Windows software and to distribute products from its fiercest rivals, court records show. 

&lt;b&gt;The Justice Department also set up an e-mail address where consumers and companies may send their comments about the antitrust settlement.&lt;/b&gt; That address is: &lt;b&gt;microsoft.atr@usdoj.gov&lt;/b&gt; Whether or not you&apos;re pro-Microsoft, anti-Microsoft, or on the fence... I encourage everyone to send their thoughts along.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12423</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:02:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>departmentofjustice</category>
		<category>doj</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>SilentSalamander</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2020/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2033666.html"&gt;Judge rules Microsoft must split up&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Judge Jackson handed down the verdict today that Microsoft should be broken into two companies: one for Windows OSes, the other for all other applications and services.  Many restrictions on Microsoft&apos;s behavior would also be put in place, pretty much just ensuring they couldn&apos;t lock anyone into exclusive contracts or force bundling deals on anyone.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2020</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 13:49:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1201/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/breaking/Microsoft_Antitrust_Trial/"&gt;The judged ruled against Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; today, saying that the company did in fact violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, but we already knew that.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1201</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:20:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>regulation</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


