<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wipo</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wipo</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wipo' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:43:10 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:43:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Isaac Eiland-Hall wins WIPO case, hands domain name over to ... Glenn Beck?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86459/Isaac%2DEilandHall%2Dwins%2DWIPO%2Dcase%2Dhands%2Ddomain%2Dname%2Dover%2Dto%2DGlenn%2DBeck</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/06/after-winning-case-man-hands-domain-name-to-glenn-beck/"&gt;Isaac Eiland-Hall &lt;b&gt;wins&lt;/b&gt; WIPO case, hands domain name over to ... &lt;b&gt;Glenn Beck?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/85677/Why-wont-Glenn-Beck-deny-these-allegations&quot;&gt; Previously.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86459</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:43:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>glennback</category>
		<category>isaaceiland-hall</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>wipo</category>
		<dc:creator>ZenMasterThis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>But only sometimes...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26349/But%2Donly%2Dsometimes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2003/d2003-0260.html"&gt;Sometimes WIPO get it right...&lt;/a&gt; One of the latest UDRP decisions says that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aberzombie.com/&quot;&gt;Aberzombie.com&lt;/a&gt; is &apos;an obvious parody&apos; and shouldn&apos;t be transferred to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abercrombie.com&quot;&gt;Abercrombie and Fitch&lt;/a&gt;. What&apos;s most interesting here is that the Aberzombie site is trading on its similarity - selling &apos;Aberzombie&apos; shirts amongst other things. That&apos;s usually enough for WIPO to snatch the domain straight back - but no:

&lt;i&gt;Although &quot;zombie&quot; preceded by &quot;aber&quot; might call to mind the Complainants&#8217; marks, especially in the context of the Respondent&#8217;s business of selling t-shirts, the Panel finds that the public would not confuse the Respondent for the Complainants, and thus Abercrombie and Aberzombie are not confusingly similar.&lt;/i&gt;

How refreshingly sensible! Also interesting: WIPO have now notched up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/updates/2003/upd193.htm&quot;&gt;5,000 UDRP domain name disputes&lt;/a&gt;. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bna.com/ilaw/&quot;&gt;BNA&apos;s Internet Law News&lt;/a&gt; email)&lt;/font&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26349</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 08:07:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abercrombie</category>
		<category>udrp</category>
		<category>wipo</category>
		<dc:creator>humuhumu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18341/</link>
		<description> Outside of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/&quot;&gt;traditional IP&lt;/a&gt; structures, there has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icip.lawnet.com.au/info5.htm&quot;&gt;ongoing research&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.org/&quot;&gt;WIPO&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellecprop.mpg.de/Enhanced/English/Homepage.HTM&quot;&gt;other organizations&lt;/a&gt; to develop a system of remuneration for the use of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.org/globalissues/tk/&quot;&gt;Traditional Knowledge&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/eng/meetings/2001/igc/index.htm&quot;&gt;Folklore&lt;/a&gt;. How could lines be drawn fairly so indigenous cultures could see some kind of return? If you think it&apos;s fair to compensate a tribe for technological and pharmaceutical contributions to patents, what about a royalty for that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/2001/01/05/FFX83DWAJHC.html&quot;&gt;Maori tattoo design&lt;/a&gt; on your shoulder? What about drumming styles that have localized roots &lt;a href=&quot;http://fac.cgu.edu/~wickera/xethnom.htm&quot;&gt;somewhere in Africa&lt;/a&gt;? What would you say is reasonable?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18341</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 19:20:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>culturalproperty</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>wipo</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


