<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wired and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wired+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wired' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 10:21:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 10:21:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16014/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0%2C1284%2C51429%2C00.html&quot;&gt;Literary lynching&lt;/a&gt;, the practice of attacking authors who make statements against the U.S. government or engage in dissent, gets a comprehensive overview with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.holtuncensored.com/literary_lynching/index.html&quot;&gt;a book in progress&lt;/a&gt;.  As 72 year old author Dorothy Bryant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.holtuncensored.com/literary_lynching/intro.html&quot;&gt;puts it&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;More than ever, we need free exchange of facts and opinions. I hope that looking back on a few cases that have had time to cool off will help us to understand the psychology of literary lynching, and to resist it &#8212; not only in others but in ourselves.&quot;  But in today&apos;s world, is there any distinction between a thoughtful response and a downright ugly rejoinder anymore?  (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobylives.com&quot;&gt;Moby Lives&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16014</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 10:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>author</category>
		<category>book</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>dissent</category>
		<category>DorothyBryant</category>
		<category>LiteraryLyncing</category>
		<category>nationalism</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10332/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46852,00.html"&gt;48 hours of wiretap without a court order?&lt;/a&gt; Sure, according to the Senate. Carnivore installations on the rise and the recent call to control crypto software are exactly what we don&apos;t need.  This is probably just the beginning.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10332</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:54:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Carnivore</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7990/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44175,00.html"&gt;US drug patients vs. the world&lt;/a&gt; in AIDS crisis.  Brazil is making generic AIDS medicine based upon existing drugs created (and of course patented) by US drug companies.  the catch?  they are giving the drugs away FOR FREE.  US Drug companies want their money.  the UN agreed ,52 in favor and 1 not in favor, for brazil&apos;s strategy for dealing with the AIDS crisis.

guess who opposed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7990</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2001 11:47:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aids</category>
		<category>antiretroviral</category>
		<category>Brazil</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>generic</category>
		<category>hiv</category>
		<category>medications</category>
		<category>patents</category>
		<category>pharmaceuticals</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Qambient</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4558/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,40378,00.html"&gt;Wired News reports on the upcoming DMCA review.&lt;/a&gt; Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lwn.net&quot;&gt;Linux Weekly News&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&quot;When music is streamed, webcasters are required to pay a performance royalty. In order to generate smooth playback of incoming streams, computers temporarily store some of the data in memory in a RAM buffer. Music publishers have stated that the data in this buffer should be considered a physical creation that would require webcasters to pay a mechanical royalty, similar to what they pay for downloads or CDs.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Anyone need any more on that?  Time to get your congressman on the phone...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4558</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:02:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DMCA</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>streaming</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3613/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39291,00.html"&gt;Nader debates Gore advisor this week&lt;/a&gt; They might not let him debate Gore face to face, but hey, at least this is something. Way to put the issues on the table, Ralph.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3613</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:11:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>snakey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1614/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36209,00.html"&gt;Say goodbye to personal liberty &lt;/a&gt; if &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:h.r.02987:&quot;&gt;this bill&lt;/A&gt; gets passed. A bill aimed at fighting drugs on and off line will limit your freedom of speech, allow police to enter your house with a warrant but not telling you what it&apos;s for.  One step closer to the Police state. And one heck of a supreme court case in the wings.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1614</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 12:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civil</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>liberties</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>eljuanbobo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/734/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34277,00.html"&gt;Potential Employment:&lt;/a&gt; Here is a chance to show what you are made of. Quit your high paying job you have now, for one that will give you the opportunity to &quot;help the children.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.734</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2000 21:45:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


