<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wired and copyright</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wired+copyright</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wired' and 'copyright' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:49:54 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:49:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9210/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/01/07/23/2338222.shtml"&gt;Adobe backs down, Dmitry left on the hook.&lt;/a&gt; They dropped all charges against Dmitry, but the Justice Department &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,45489,00.html&quot;&gt;may not&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9210</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:49:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Adobe</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DefCon</category>
		<category>DMCA</category>
		<category>Dmitry</category>
		<category>DmitrySklyarov</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Kikkoman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4558/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,40378,00.html"&gt;Wired News reports on the upcoming DMCA review.&lt;/a&gt; Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lwn.net&quot;&gt;Linux Weekly News&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&quot;When music is streamed, webcasters are required to pay a performance royalty. In order to generate smooth playback of incoming streams, computers temporarily store some of the data in memory in a RAM buffer. Music publishers have stated that the data in this buffer should be considered a physical creation that would require webcasters to pay a mechanical royalty, similar to what they pay for downloads or CDs.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Anyone need any more on that?  Time to get your congressman on the phone...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4558</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:02:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DMCA</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>streaming</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2858/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,38129,00.html"&gt;Music Industry to back down on Work-For-Hire.&lt;/a&gt; If you read the Courtney Love stories last month, you&apos;ll have heard that they snuck one across the plate in a satellite TV bill.  Everyone screamed, and they&apos;ve apparently decided to fight other battles.  [spotted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jerrypournelle.com/mail/currentmail.html&quot;&gt;Jerry Pournelle&apos;s mail page&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2858</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:28:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<category>WorkForHite</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1720/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,36424,00.html"&gt;Dr. Dre follows in Metallica&apos;s footseps&lt;/a&gt; and hands over a list of 239,612 user ID&apos;s to Napster to for possible termination of these accounts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1720</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2000 17:36:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DrDre</category>
		<category>FileSharing</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>Napster</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>vitaflo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/292/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,32263,00.html"&gt;So the DVD copy protection was cracked,&lt;/a&gt; and it&apos;s interesting to hear the comments from the industry. The DVD Forum&apos;s release makes the hackers sound awful. The DVD folks feel like they&apos;ve been ripped off. Can&apos;t these motion picture and DVD industry folks see this as a good thing? A couple hackers decrypted what was supposed to be a secure format and they&apos;re horrified? They should be horrified at the idiots that created the weak &apos;protection&apos; in the first place. These hackers just did the industry a great service. They found a gaping security hole before good recordable DVDs ever came out! I&apos;m surprised hackers are vilified instead of being offered lucrative positions as security experts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.292</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:15:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DVD</category>
		<category>DVDs</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


