<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wired and hackers</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wired+hackers</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wired' and 'hackers' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 22:28:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 22:28:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Neal Stephenson, Psychic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26121/Neal%2DStephenson%2DPsychic</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/games/0,2101,59034,00.html"&gt;&quot;Then we realized that somehow an insane god had taken control of our world and was out to kill us all.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Subscribers of the multiplayer online game &quot;Shadowbane&quot; were in for a shock Tuesday evening when they realized the game system had been hacked, and the rules fundamentally altered, and not in a good way (unless you happen to like mayhem).  While this ended up being a &quot;no harm, no foul&quot; scenario, as everything was eventually set right, it was breaking new ground in terms of the uses of hacking.  In a world where characters in these games are sold via EBay, and nearly half a million people subscribe to Everquest, how long before legitimate (non &quot;fun and games&quot;) version of what just happened occurs?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26121</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 22:28:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gaming</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>MMORPG</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>Shadowbane</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12725/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,46187,00.html"&gt;AirSnort.&lt;/a&gt; The dangerous app with the unlikely name allows users to snatch data being passed over wireless networks, eventually capturing passwords to the network.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12725</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:27:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AirSnort</category>
		<category>application</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>networks</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<category>wireless</category>
		<dc:creator>o2b</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6881/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,42921,00.html"&gt;Germany Plans Infowar Against Websites?&lt;/a&gt; So, Wired News reports that German Interior Minister Otto Schily has said publicly that Germany should stage denial-of-service attacks on right-wing websites housed in other countries. AOL versus Germany as WWWIII/InfoWar I?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6881</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2001 13:54:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DDOS</category>
		<category>DenialOfService</category>
		<category>DOS</category>
		<category>Germany</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>InfoWar</category>
		<category>OttoSchily</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>bclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4063/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,39984,00.html"&gt;Do as we say, not as we do.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4063</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:45:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>network</category>
		<category>patch</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/292/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,32263,00.html"&gt;So the DVD copy protection was cracked,&lt;/a&gt; and it&apos;s interesting to hear the comments from the industry. The DVD Forum&apos;s release makes the hackers sound awful. The DVD folks feel like they&apos;ve been ripped off. Can&apos;t these motion picture and DVD industry folks see this as a good thing? A couple hackers decrypted what was supposed to be a secure format and they&apos;re horrified? They should be horrified at the idiots that created the weak &apos;protection&apos; in the first place. These hackers just did the industry a great service. They found a gaping security hole before good recordable DVDs ever came out! I&apos;m surprised hackers are vilified instead of being offered lucrative positions as security experts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.292</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:15:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DVD</category>
		<category>DVDs</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


