<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wired and privacy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wired+privacy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wired' and 'privacy' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:57:47 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:57:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Information is not knowledge.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48815/Information%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dknowledge</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bwired.nl/"&gt;Privacy?&lt;/a&gt; No thanks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48815</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:57:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>home</category>
		<category>information</category>
		<category>obsessive</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sensors</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>I Love Tacos</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Giving kids&apos; privacy away</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22024/Giving%2Dkids%2Dprivacy%2Daway</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,56665,00.html&quot;&gt;&quot;It&apos;s a vast departure from the way we&apos;ve done business,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; said Donna Harlan, an associate superintendent in the Northampton school system. &quot;We are not in the business of giving lists of names of kids to anybody. That was tough. The issue was if we were to receive federal or state money, we had to comply with the law.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22024</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:18:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>artifex</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21100/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,55999,00.html"&gt;The Mark of the Beast?&lt;/a&gt; After the quick FDA approval of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9901/14/chipman.idg/&quot;&gt;implantable human chips&lt;/a&gt; ,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adsx.com/&quot;&gt;Applied Digital Solutions&lt;/a&gt; , the manufacturer of the chips, has already launched a national campaign with the tagline &quot;Get Chipped&quot;, and people are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techtv.com/news/culture/story/0,24195,3372523,00.html&quot;&gt;lining up&lt;/a&gt;. Other&apos;s are afraid, for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tldm.org/News4/MarkoftheBeast.htm&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/implantsitesnew.htm&quot;&gt;reason&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Chip_Implants/&quot;&gt;another&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21100</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:22:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ADS</category>
		<category>AppliedDigitalSolutions</category>
		<category>ImplantableChip</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>RFID</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>VeriChip</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Espoo2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18050/</link>
		<description> Microsoft unleashes Palladium, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/770511.asp&quot;&gt;an intrusive doozy&lt;/a&gt; of a feature involving specially secure AMD/Intel computer chips and cryptology provided by Microsoft.  Newsweek&apos;s head-bobbing Steven Levy, the first to get the story, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/770511.asp&quot;&gt;remains taciturn&lt;/a&gt;, failing to call into question Microsoft&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1001-808010.html?legacy=cnet&quot;&gt;security sins of the past&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2052/020625palladiumconcerns/&quot; target=&quot;first_window&quot;&gt;Geeks run scared&lt;/a&gt; while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25891.html&quot; target=&quot;first_window&quot;&gt;digital rights and GPL concerns&lt;/a&gt; are wholly ignored by the mainstream media.  Is this yet another example of a malcontent media that will never possess the balls to actually question a new feature put out by Microsoft?  Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,53466,00.html&quot; target=&quot;first_window&quot;&gt;Wired&lt;/a&gt; can&apos;t seem to read between the lines of a technology that &quot;stemmed from early work by engineers to deliver digital movies that couldn&apos;t be pirated.&quot;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18050</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>cryptology</category>
		<category>digitalrights</category>
		<category>geeks</category>
		<category>intrusion</category>
		<category>intrusive</category>
		<category>malcontent</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>newsweek</category>
		<category>palladium</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16105/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wired.com"&gt;wired&lt;/a&gt; on mar 28, wired.com say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,51379,00.html&quot;&gt;Privacy Gets Some Respect&lt;/a&gt;.... April 2, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,51520,00.html&quot;&gt;a completely different theory&lt;/a&gt;.  inconsistent magazine?  or both sides of the story?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16105</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 04:29:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>bliss322</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12680/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,48664,00.html"&gt;Routes of Least Surveillance&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;It&apos;s not the journey or the destination; it&apos;s the getting there unseen that counts.  (if you hate Wired, don&apos;t click the link)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12680</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Irontom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10240/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46816,00.html"&gt;Terrorism&apos;s first win? Bye-Bye crypto.&lt;/a&gt; The rubble is still burning and the Republicans are ready to strip of our right to use crypto products.  Opportunists feeding off fear.  That&apos;s how you win at the terrorist game.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10240</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:05:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>backdoors</category>
		<category>crypto</category>
		<category>cryptography</category>
		<category>decryption</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>RightToPrivacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1614/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36209,00.html"&gt;Say goodbye to personal liberty &lt;/a&gt; if &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:h.r.02987:&quot;&gt;this bill&lt;/A&gt; gets passed. A bill aimed at fighting drugs on and off line will limit your freedom of speech, allow police to enter your house with a warrant but not telling you what it&apos;s for.  One step closer to the Police state. And one heck of a supreme court case in the wings.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1614</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 12:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civil</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>liberties</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>eljuanbobo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


