<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wired and security</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wired+security</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wired' and 'security' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66234/Ron%2DPaul%2DSpam</link>
		<description> When &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salberg.org/2007/10/29/ron-paul-using-spam-emails-to-get-out-message/&quot;&gt;Ron Paul email spam&lt;/a&gt; started hitting inboxes in late October, &lt;a href=&quot;http://main.uab.edu/show.asp?durki=114955&quot;&gt;UAB Computer Forensics&lt;/a&gt; Directory Gary Warner published findings on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://garwarner.blogspot.com/2007/10/first-2008-campaign-spamming-virus.html&quot;&gt;spam&apos;s textual patterns&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://garwarner.blogspot.com/2007/11/ron-paul-spam-and-online-support.html&quot;&gt;illicit botnet used to spread it&lt;/a&gt; -- findings which were picked up by media outlets and tech websites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2007/10/31/ron_pauls_botnet/&quot;&gt;Salon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071031-ron-paul-camp-gets-over-enthusiastic-with-spam.html&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/&quot;&gt;Wired Magazine&apos;s &quot;Threat Level&quot; blog&lt;/a&gt;, the latter in a set of followup posts by writer Sarah Stirland: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/astroturfing-in.html&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/more-on-ron-pau.html&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/ron-paul-spam-u.html&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;. The Ron Paul fan response was swift and decisive: clearly the botnet was the work of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nolanchart.com/article259.html&quot;&gt;anti-Ron Paul hackers trying to discredit his campaign&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://disinter.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/giuliani-behind-alleged-ron-paul-spam/&quot;&gt; Rudy Giuliani had paid Stirland (and not UAB Computer Forensics) to do a smear piece&lt;/a&gt;   -- as claimed by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5LgUiz2mBA&quot;&gt;YouTube video&lt;/a&gt; pointing to posts on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rudygiulianiforum.com/index.php?topic=38.0&quot;&gt;RudyGiulianiForum.com&lt;/a&gt;. Thus proving, once again, that the Ron Paul campaign&apos;s greatest liability is not so much his &lt;a href=&quot;http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/06/ron-paul-vs-new-world-order.html&quot;&gt;far-right conspiracy-driven antifederal libertarianism&lt;/a&gt;, but rather &lt;a href=&quot;http://suicidegirls.com/news/politics/22557/&quot;&gt;the spittle-flecked anger&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://spaceramblings.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-supporters-gaming-youtube-digg-to-smear-reporter-critical-of-ron-paul/&quot;&gt;his own noisiest supporters&lt;/a&gt;.

Beets are great! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740&quot;&gt;Ron Paul!&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66234</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>botnet</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>cults</category>
		<category>libertarian</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ronpaul</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wired-tapped</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51994/Wiredtapped</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,71022-1.html"&gt;Crashing the Wiretapper&apos;s Ball&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Wired News&lt;/em&gt; snuck a reporter into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telestrategies.com/ISS_SPR06/&quot;&gt;ISS World Conference&lt;/a&gt;, a no-press-allowed conference for companies that sell wiretapping equipment to law enforcement, ISPs, telcos, and repressive governments. Hilarity ensues. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/01/reporter_sneaks_into.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51994</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1stamendment</category>
		<category>4thestate</category>
		<category>freedomofthepress</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>ISS</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>pithy comment</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How to guide to taking over the country&apos;s nuclear secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23844/How%2Dto%2Dguide%2Dto%2Dtaking%2Dover%2Dthe%2Dcountrys%2Dnuclear%2Dsecrets</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,57792,00.html"&gt;In this expos&amp;#0233;&lt;/a&gt; a Wired News reporter easily gains access to some sensitive areas of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/&quot;&gt;Los Alamos National Lab&lt;/a&gt;, and brings back pictures to prove it. While certainly an embarrassment for a place throwing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/news/releases/archive/03-025.shtml&quot;&gt;workshops on homeland security&lt;/a&gt; (and doubly so because their seminars started today), is it wise for Wired News to post essentially a how-to guide on breaking into the lab where America&apos;s nuclear secrets reside?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23844</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:27:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>labs</category>
		<category>losalamos</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21100/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,55999,00.html"&gt;The Mark of the Beast?&lt;/a&gt; After the quick FDA approval of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9901/14/chipman.idg/&quot;&gt;implantable human chips&lt;/a&gt; ,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adsx.com/&quot;&gt;Applied Digital Solutions&lt;/a&gt; , the manufacturer of the chips, has already launched a national campaign with the tagline &quot;Get Chipped&quot;, and people are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techtv.com/news/culture/story/0,24195,3372523,00.html&quot;&gt;lining up&lt;/a&gt;. Other&apos;s are afraid, for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tldm.org/News4/MarkoftheBeast.htm&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/implantsitesnew.htm&quot;&gt;reason&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Chip_Implants/&quot;&gt;another&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21100</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:22:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ADS</category>
		<category>AppliedDigitalSolutions</category>
		<category>ImplantableChip</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>RFID</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>VeriChip</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Espoo2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12725/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,46187,00.html"&gt;AirSnort.&lt;/a&gt; The dangerous app with the unlikely name allows users to snatch data being passed over wireless networks, eventually capturing passwords to the network.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12725</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:27:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AirSnort</category>
		<category>application</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>networks</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<category>wireless</category>
		<dc:creator>o2b</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8800/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44984,00.html"&gt;European Parliament says Echelon exists&lt;/a&gt; and is more or less powerless to stop it.  All the more reason for government and industry to create encryption standards.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8800</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:39:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>EuropeanUnion</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5489/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,41397,00.html"&gt;Chiariglione steps aside.&lt;/a&gt; SDMI over?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5489</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 01:45:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>digital</category>
		<category>LeonardoChiariglione</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>SDMI</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4063/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,39984,00.html"&gt;Do as we say, not as we do.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4063</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:45:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>network</category>
		<category>patch</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/476/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,33420,00.html"&gt;Yet another reason why HTML email sucks.&lt;/a&gt; WebTV should limit incoming messages to plain text only, or at least let users turn off HTML rendering in their mail clients.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.476</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2000 12:50:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>HTML</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>WebTV</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


