<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wiretapping</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wiretapping</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wiretapping' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:08:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:08:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Who said what now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78549/Who%2Dsaid%2Dwhat%2Dnow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/01/obama-sides-wit.html"&gt;Wired: Obama Sides With Bush in Spy Case.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;The Obama administration fell in line with the Bush administration Thursday when it urged a federal judge to set aside a ruling in a closely watched spy case weighing whether a U.S. president may bypass Congress and establish a program of eavesdropping on Americans without warrants.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78549</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:08:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>CanYouHearMeNow</category>
		<category>change</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>davidkravets</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>kravets</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>ruling</category>
		<category>spies</category>
		<category>spy</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>warrant</category>
		<category>warrantless</category>
		<category>what</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>NSA Spying: Cat now out of bag.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78522/NSA%2DSpying%2DCat%2Dnow%2Dout%2Dof%2Dbag</link>
		<description> Russell Tice, former NSA security analyst, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/video/nsa-spied-journalists&quot;&gt;just came on the Keith Olbermann show&lt;/a&gt; revealing that the NSA&apos;s domestic surveillance programs were not only far greater in scope than formerly thought, but also were specifically targeted at journalists.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78522</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:39:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>domesticsurveillance</category>
		<category>keitholbermann</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>olbermann</category>
		<category>russeltice</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>dunkadunc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>NSA Has &#8216;Routinely&#8217; Listened In On Americans&#8217; Phone Calls, Passed Around &#8216;Salacious&#8217; Bits</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75517/NSA%2DHas%2D%3FRoutinely%3F%2DListened%2DIn%2DOn%2DAmericans%3F%2DPhone%2DCalls%2DPassed%2DAround%2D%3FSalacious%3F%2DBits</link>
		<description> &quot;Ever since President Bush confirmed the existence of a National Security Administration wiretapping program in late 2005, he has insisted it is aimed only at terrorists&#8217; calls and protects Americans&#8217; civil liberties (&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/01/nsa.spying/index.html&quot;&gt;This is a limited program &lt;/a&gt;designed to prevent attacks on the United States of America &#8212; and I repeat: limited.&quot;)....However, &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5987804&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;ABC News&lt;/a&gt; reports [&lt;small&gt;text with embedded video&lt;/small&gt;] that the NSA frequently listened to and transcribed the private phone calls of Americans abroad....These conversations included those of American soldiers stationed in Iraq and American aid workers abroad, such as Doctors Without Borders.&quot;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/09/wiretapping-whistleblowers/&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; A former military intercept operator: &quot;These were just really everyday, average, ordinary Americans who happened to be in the Middle East....personal, private things with Americans who are not in any way, shape or form associated with anything to do with terrorism....[We] routinely shared salacious or tantalizing phone calls that had been intercepted....&apos;Hey, check this out...there&#8217;s good phone sex or there&#8217;s some pillow talk, pull up this call, it&#8217;s really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, &apos;Wow, this was crazy.&apos;&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75517</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:51:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Eavesdropping</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Whistleblowers</category>
		<category>WireTapping</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Good dance moves for two right feet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73178/Good%2Ddance%2Dmoves%2Dfor%2Dtwo%2Dright%2Dfeet</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/washington/10fisa.html?partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&quot;&gt;Obama votes to grant telecom companies immunity&lt;/a&gt; for illegal wiretapping and &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6e05e350-4de5-11dd-820e-000077b07658.html&quot;&gt;refines&lt;/a&gt;&quot; his stance against Iraq to consider indefinite, undefined or vaguely defined occupation. One remarks about Obama&apos;s recent move to the right with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dieselsweeties.com/blog/?p=347&quot;&gt;new campaign logo&lt;/a&gt;. Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/08/obama_tells_voters_his_views_h.html&quot;&gt;denies any change in policy&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73178</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:43:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fisa</category>
		<category>hope</category>
		<category>impeachment</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Decision on FISA delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73045/Decision%2Don%2DFISA%2Ddelayed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/housing-bill-fisa-delayed-until-after-july-recess-2008-06-26.html"&gt;Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) delayed.&lt;/a&gt; Senator Dodd &lt;a href=&quot;http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/4476&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;This bill does not say, &apos;Trust the American people;  Trust the courts and judges and juries to come to just decisions.&apos; Retroactive immunity sends a message that is crystal clear: &apos;Trust me.&apos;&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/rospars/gGxsZF&quot;&gt;Obama talks about why he supports the bill.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; may vote after the Fourth of July recess. &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/72648/Telecom-Amnesty-Bill-Tomorrow&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73045</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:01:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Dodd</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>immunity</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>joannemerriam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Shred the banana peel</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71165/Shred%2Dthe%2Dbanana%2Dpeel</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/04/28/080428fa_fact_keefe"&gt;State Secrets: A government misstep in a wiretapping case.&lt;/a&gt; A New Yorker article on the Kafkaesque case of &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/03/72811&quot;&gt;Al Haramain v. Bush&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/&quot;&gt;Threat Level&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt; Note that Threat Level disagrees with the New Yorker piece about &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/nsa-spied-on-la.html&quot;&gt;the future of the case&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71165</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:35:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Secrecy</category>
		<category>StateSecretsPrivilege</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<category>Wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Senate Votes for Retroactive immunity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69013/Senate%2DVotes%2Dfor%2DRetroactive%2Dimmunity</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/12/amnesty_day/index.html"&gt;Senate votes for retroactive telecom immunity&lt;/a&gt; 67 senators &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00015&quot;&gt;voted against&lt;/a&gt; the Dodd/Feingold  amendment to strip telecom immunity from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_America_Act_of_2007&quot;&gt;Protect&lt;/a&gt; America Act. It still needs to be pass the house. The Democrats voting against the amendment to strip immunity (and therefore maintain the current liability) were: Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Evan Bayh (D-IA), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Tom Carper (D-DE), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Jim Webb (D-VA), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Kent Conrad (D-ND), and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI).  Hillary Clinton was the only Democrat not voting today. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69013</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:02:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>immunity</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>PAA</category>
		<category>Reid</category>
		<category>telecom</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who&apos;s Soft on Terrorism?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65397/Whos%2DSoft%2Don%2DTerrorism</link>
		<description> Who&apos;s soft on terrorism?  Surely not the Democrats, who are about to enable the National Security Agency to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/washington/09nsa.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;extend its secret domestic wiretapping program&lt;/a&gt; after saying otherwise for months.  Surely not the Republican White House, determined to rush out a new Osama bin Laden video &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/08/AR2007100801817.html?hpid=topnews&quot;&gt;even if it burns an intelligence connection spying on Al Qaeda&lt;/a&gt; that has been carefully cultivated for years.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65397</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Osama</category>
		<category>OsamabinLaden</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>SITE</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;If you scratch a paranoid, you find a narcissist&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64306/If%2Dyou%2Dscratch%2Da%2Dparanoid%2Dyou%2Dfind%2Da%2Dnarcissist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2172952/entry/2172953/"&gt;What&apos;s the Big Secret?&lt;/a&gt; Four surveillance experts try to figure out what the NSA&apos;s superclassified wiretapping program really is (hint: it may have something to do with &lt;a href=http://www.slate.com/id/2172952/entry/2172970/&gt;the filters&lt;/a&gt;).  They don&apos;t seem to realize that this kind of reckless public discussion means &lt;a href=http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/22/mcconnell-unclassified/&gt;some Americans are going to die&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/&gt;Threat Level&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64306</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Classified</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Secrecy</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>SecurityTheater</category>
		<category>Sousveillance</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<category>Warrantless</category>
		<category>Wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can you hear me now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57846/Can%2Dyou%2Dhear%2Dme%2Dnow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://apnews.myway.com//article/20070117/D8MN7KQ00.html"&gt;Illegal wiretaps to end.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57846</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:19:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>fisa</category>
		<category>fourthamendment</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>EarBucket</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can you hear the Constitution now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53973/Can%2Dyou%2Dhear%2Dthe%2DConstitution%2Dnow</link>
		<description> U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor has ruled that  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14393611/&quot;&gt;warrantless wiretapping by the Bush Administration&apos;s National Security Agency is unconstitutional,&lt;/a&gt; saying it violates rights to free speech and privacy.

Judge Taylor, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060807/NEWS05/608070381/1007&quot;&gt;a veteran of the civil rights movement and the first black female federal district judge in the U.S. 6th Circuit,&lt;/a&gt; was appointed to the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by President Carter. Legal experts expect the decision to be overturned by the 6th Circuit sitting &lt;i&gt;en banc&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/06/judiciary-reminds-bush-administration.html&quot;&gt;Background on the case by Glenn Greenwald:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The theory of the lawsuit -- [is that warrantless wiretapping&apos;s] mere existence deters citizens from freely exercising their free speech rights&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53973</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:48:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Anna</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Diggs</category>
		<category>Judge</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>surelyThis</category>
		<category>Taylor</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>orthogonality</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All your data are belong to us.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52474/All%2Dyour%2Ddata%2Dare%2Dbelong%2Dto%2Dus</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=17346&amp;amp;hed=AT%26T%3A+We+Own+Your+Records"&gt;Privacy Schmivacy&lt;/a&gt; On the eve of its hearing on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8ICP56G0.htm?sub=apn_tech_down&amp;chan=tc&quot;&gt;charges&lt;/a&gt; that it assisted in the government&#8217;s illegal spying on millions of Americans, AT&amp;amp;T, the largest phone company in the United States, has changed its privacy policy to clearly establish its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-privacy22jun22,1,6923857.story?coll=la-headlines-business&quot;&gt;ownership&lt;/a&gt; of its customers&#8217; personal account information.


In its revised &lt;a href=&quot;http://att.sbc.com/gen/privacy-policy?pid=2506&quot;&gt;policy&lt;/a&gt;, AT&amp;amp;T makes it clear that &#8220;while your account information may be personal to you, these records constitute business records that are owned by AT&amp;amp;T. As such, AT&amp;amp;T may disclose such records to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_06.php#004750&quot;&gt;Oh, really?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52474</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ATT</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>TelecomDeregulation</category>
		<category>WarOnTerror</category>
		<category>WireTapping</category>
		<dc:creator>squirrel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wired-tapped</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51994/Wiredtapped</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,71022-1.html"&gt;Crashing the Wiretapper&apos;s Ball&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Wired News&lt;/em&gt; snuck a reporter into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telestrategies.com/ISS_SPR06/&quot;&gt;ISS World Conference&lt;/a&gt;, a no-press-allowed conference for companies that sell wiretapping equipment to law enforcement, ISPs, telcos, and repressive governments. Hilarity ensues. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/01/reporter_sneaks_into.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51994</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1stamendment</category>
		<category>4thestate</category>
		<category>freedomofthepress</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>ISS</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>pithy comment</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You say to-may-to, I say to-mah-to...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50480/You%2Dsay%2Dtomayto%2DI%2Dsay%2Dtomahto</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/politics/29nsa.html?ex=1301288400&amp;amp;en=603fa5fc610103fa&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;Taste&apos;s great!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/national/20060329-120346-1901r.htm&quot;&gt;Less filling!&lt;/a&gt; So did &quot;several former judges who served on the panel also voiced skepticism at a Senate hearing about the president&apos;s constitutional authority to order wiretapping on Americans without a court order&quot; or did &quot;FISA judges say Bush within law&quot;? Just in case you doubted that different newspapers present news stories (even those with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-span.org/&quot;&gt;official audio coverage&lt;/a&gt; available!) differently...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50480</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:03:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>fisa</category>
		<category>fisc</category>
		<category>foreignintelligencesurveillencecourt</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>twsf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Agency That Could Be Big Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47857/The%2DAgency%2DThat%2DCould%2DBe%2DBig%2DBrother</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/25/weekinreview/25bamford.html?ex=1293166800&amp;amp;en=3d09922ebe6b2eac&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;The Agency That Could Be Big Brother&lt;/a&gt; [when this guy talks about NSA, he is authoritative] &quot;DEEP in a remote, fog-layered hollow near Sugar Grove, W.Va., hidden by fortress-like mountains, sits the country&apos;s largest eavesdropping bug. Located in a &quot;radio quiet&quot; zone, the station&apos;s large parabolic dishes secretly and silently sweep in millions of private telephone calls and e-mail messages an hour&quot;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47857</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:17:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>nationalsecurityagency</category>
		<category>nsa</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Echelon: 60 Minutes discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47729/Echelon%2D60%2DMinutes%2Ddiscussion</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cryptome.org/echelon-60min.htm"&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt; This is what we know--or do not know--about NSA prgram called Echelon, from 60 Minute show (TV) in 2000. If we assume this what had been going on and there were some sort of restraints for internal spying, then what is going on now? This evening I had heard on radio that the White House claimed that only calls going in and out of the country might be monitored. But this early interview suggests that such calls were monitored previous to the &quot;new&quot; approach. Why were legal restraints put in place calling for judicial hearings? Because of spying abuse done under Nixon. Those restraints are now removed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47729</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:40:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>60minutes</category>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>nsa</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Signaling Vulnerabilities in Wiretapping Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47134/Signaling%2DVulnerabilities%2Din%2DWiretapping%2DSystems</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.crypto.com/papers/wiretapping/"&gt;Signaling Vulnerabilities in Wiretapping Systems.&lt;/a&gt; The technology used for decades by law enforcement agents to wiretap telephones has a security flaw that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/30/national/30tap.html&quot;&gt;allows the person being wiretapped to stop the recorder remotely&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bugmenot.com/view.php?url=www.nytimes.com&quot;&gt;bugmenot&lt;/a&gt;].    It is also possible to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crypto.com/papers/wiretap.pdf&quot;&gt;falsify the numbers dialed&lt;/a&gt; [pdf].  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47134</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:59:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>calea</category>
		<category>fbi</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>vulnerability</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>event</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FBI adds to wiretap wish list</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31786/FBI%2Dadds%2Dto%2Dwiretap%2Dwish%2Dlist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5172948.html?tag=nefd_top"&gt;Proposal to have companies rewire their networks to support easy wiretapping by police&lt;/a&gt; &quot;A far-reaching proposal from the FBI, made public Friday, would require all broadband Internet providers, including cable modem and DSL companies, to rewire their networks to support easy wiretapping by police. The FBI&apos;s request to the Federal Communications Commission aims to give police ready access to any form of Internet-based  communications. If approved as drafted, the proposal could dramatically expand the scope of the agency&apos;s wiretap powers, raise costs for cable broadband companies and complicate Internet product development.&quot; Read more about the FBI&apos;s proposal at Cnet.com.
or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4515410/&quot;&gt;MSNBC.&lt;/a&gt;  But where is the actual proposal?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31786</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 06:59:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>broadband</category>
		<category>CNet</category>
		<category>doublepost</category>
		<category>DSL</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>fluffycreature</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FBI Wiretaps reach record numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31382/FBI%2DWiretaps%2Dreach%2Drecord%2Dnumbers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cq.com/corp/show.do?page=crawford/20040224_homeland"&gt;Thanks to PATRIOT Act, FBI wiretaps reach record numbers.&lt;/a&gt; &apos;Thanks to the bundle of anti-terrorism measures known as the USA Patriot Act, the FBI is conducting a &quot;record amount&quot; of electronic surveillance, including the use of wiretaps and bugs, according to an FBI spokesman and a Justice Department budget document.  Yet the bounty perpetuates an old problem: The bureau can&apos;t keep up with all the information pouring in.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31382</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fbi</category>
		<category>patriotact</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>busbyism</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bug Bug Buggy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24425/Bug%2DBug%2DBuggy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2864063.stm"&gt;Bug Bug Buggy&lt;/a&gt; - Electronic bugging devices have been found at offices used by French and German delegations at European Union headquarters in Brussels.

I think I can guess where fingers will get pointed....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24425</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 04:38:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brussels</category>
		<category>bugging</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>spies</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>tomcosgrave</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Secret U.S. court OKs electronic spying</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21713/Secret%2DUS%2Dcourt%2DOKs%2Delectronic%2Dspying</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1023-966311.html"&gt;Secret U.S. court OKs electronic spying&lt;/a&gt; Big Brother much? John Ashcroft is well on his way to becoming &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.criminaljustice.org/public.nsf/newsreleases/2002mn005?opendocument&quot;&gt;the next J. Edgar Hoover&lt;/a&gt;, or worse. The government can already secretly &lt;a href=&quot;http://buffalonews.com/editorial/20021111/1041376.asp&quot;&gt;spy on what books we&apos;re reading&lt;/a&gt;, thanks to the Patriot Act. Previous MeFi threads have covered the evils of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/19015&quot;&gt;Total Information Awareness&lt;/a&gt; and how it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/21610&quot;&gt;makes everyone a suspect&lt;/a&gt;. Now a &quot;secret court&quot; gives the government &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/19/opinion/19TUE2.html?ex=1038373200&amp;en=e962a35d3a0087f9&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot;&gt;a green light to spy&lt;/a&gt; while the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/Cyber-Liberties/Cyber-Liberties.cfm?ID=11332&amp;c=58&quot;&gt;ACLU&lt;/a&gt; tried to figure out if there is any recourse.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21713</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:29:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>JohnAshcroft</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wiretap</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>Dok Millennium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17516/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/internetnews/story/0,7369,725204,00.html"&gt;Bye Bye, Privacy.&lt;/a&gt; Despite opposition from civil liberties groups worldwide, the European parliament bowed to pressure from individual governments, led by Britain, and approved legislation to give police the power to access the communications records of every phone and internet user.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17516</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 06:52:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>europeanparliament</category>
		<category>greatbritain</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>tpoh.org</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10769/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/57/21836.html"&gt;The register&lt;/a&gt; chimes in on new anti-terrorist bills that attack due process, the fourth amendment, and encryption.  Sample letters and information on how to contact your reps are available at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/alerts/20010921_eff_wiretap_alert.html&quot;&gt;Electronic Frontier Foundation.&lt;/a&gt; Act quickly, because congress sure will.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10769</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:33:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MATA</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7693/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/18950.html"&gt;Don&apos;t make phone calls in Vegas. The Mob is listening.&lt;/a&gt; Whores! Wiretapping! Kevin Mitnick! Men nicknamed &apos;Aspirins&apos; with electric drills! And more, courtesy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register&lt;/a&gt;. How widespread is this kind of telco infiltration? Should we trust &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; phone calls, anywhere?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7693</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 08:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>lasvegas</category>
		<category>mafia</category>
		<category>mob</category>
		<category>phonecall</category>
		<category>vegas</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>darukaru</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6094/</link>
		<description> The state of Florida has charged a teenage student with a felony violation of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://fyi.cnn.com/2001/fyi/teachers.ednews/02/28/recordingcharge.ap/index.html&quot;&gt; wiretapping law &lt;/a&gt; for taping her chemistry class lecture.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6094</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:15:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>florida</category>
		<category>lecture</category>
		<category>student</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


