<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wmd and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wmd+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wmd' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:47:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:47:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>White House may have published how-to nuke guide</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56009/White%2DHouse%2Dmay%2Dhave%2Dpublished%2Dhowto%2Dnuke%2Dguide</link>
		<description> Last March, the White House put numerous Iraqi government documents online, hoping to &quot;leverage the internet&quot; to find evidence of Saddam&apos;s nuclear potential. After questioning from the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; this week, the site has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061103/NEWS99/61103002/1009/NEWS07&quot;&gt;now been shut down&lt;/a&gt;, as it has been revealed that the Bush administration, by publishing the information, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html&quot;&gt;may have publicly published detailed information on how to build atomic weapons&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://instapundit.com/archives/033723.php&quot;&gt;Right-wing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/008423.php&quot;&gt;bloggers&lt;/a&gt;, many of whom have been discussing the documents all year, have seen the &lt;a href=&quot;http://redstate.com/blogs/shiner/2006/nov/02/ny_times_confirms_iraqi_nuclear_weapons_program&quot;&gt;sunny side&lt;/a&gt; of the news, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731252/posts&quot;&gt;claiming&lt;/a&gt; the real issue of the potential distribution of nuclear plans (which were dated pre-1991) is the &quot;proof Saddam had a nuclear program.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56009</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Documents</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Nuclear</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Half of U.S. still believes Iraq had WMD.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53664/Half%2Dof%2DUS%2Dstill%2Dbelieves%2DIraq%2Dhad%2DWMD</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060806/ap_on_re_us/iraq_believing_wmd"&gt;Half of America apparently still thinks&lt;/a&gt; so, a new poll finds, and experts see a raft of reasons why: a drumbeat of voices from talk radio to die-hard bloggers to the Oval Office, a surprise headline here or there, a rallying around a partisan flag, and a growing need for people, in their own minds, to justify the war in Iraq.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So much for Karl Rove&apos;s claim that it&apos;s wrong to think of U.S. voters as [&lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&amp;storyid=2006-07-30T204640Z_01_N29205494_RTRUKOC_0_US-ROVE.xml&amp;src=rss&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;uninformed and gullible&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.] Or &quot;There are practitioners of politics who hold that voters are dumb, ill-informed and &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;easily misled&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, that voters can be manipulated by a &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;clever ad or smart line&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;,&quot; Rove said. Previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/27420&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Thank you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/52460&quot;&gt;Fox News&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Remember the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/rd?http://65.109.167.118/pipa/pdf/oct03/IraqMedia_Oct03_rpt.pdf&quot;&gt;2003 study&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) by the University of Maryland&apos;s Program on International Policy (PIPA)? It found that &quot;Fox News viewers were &quot;significantly &lt;em&gt;more likely to have misperceptions&lt;/em&gt;&quot; about the Iraq war than all other media consumers.&quot;

Also the study found that &quot;[t]hose who receive most of their news from Fox News are &lt;em&gt;more likely than average&lt;/em&gt; to have misperceptions.&quot; For instance, of the &quot;three key misperceptions&quot; -- which the study listed as &quot;the beliefs that ... links between Iraq and al-Qaeda have been found, that WMD have been found in Iraq and that world public opinion approved of the US going to war with Iraq.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53664</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:23:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Rove</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>ArunK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fox news knows the truth before anyone else . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52460/Fox%2Dnews%2Dknows%2Dthe%2Dtruth%2Dbefore%2Danyone%2Delse</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/21/santorum-wmd/"&gt;WMDs?&lt;/a&gt; Sorry if this is double post or newsfilter, but fox news is claiming that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/news/ext_wire.html?rowid=47332&quot;&gt;WMDs&lt;/a&gt; were found in Iraq. Is it ethical to state as truth that which was been unconfirmed by anyone but one person?  Depending on how this pans out, this could continue the shift of approval that started last week.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52460</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:25:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>klik99</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Let him stay one second.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51398/Let%2Dhim%2Dstay%2Done%2Dsecond</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/05/04.html#a8164"&gt;Newsfilter: Rumsfeld squirms&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51398</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 13:50:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>dissent</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>bardic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cultivating the Source</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45696/Cultivating%2Dthe%2DSource</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/search/article_display.jsp?schema=&amp;amp;vnu_content_id=1001220134"&gt;With admiration, Scooter Libby.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45696</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:33:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Fitzpatrick</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Libby</category>
		<category>Miller</category>
		<category>Plame</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>Rove</category>
		<category>Times</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Unfeeling President</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35875/The%2DUnfeeling%2DPresident</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.easthamptonstar.com/20040909/col5.htm"&gt;The Unfeeling President by E.L. Doctorow:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
This president does not know what death is. He hasn&apos;t the mind for it. You see him joking with the press, peering under the table for the weapons of mass destruction he can&apos;t seem to find, you see him at rallies strutting up to the stage in shirt sleeves to the roar of the carefully screened crowd, smiling and waving, triumphal, a he-man.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35875</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:42:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>eldoctrow</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Global warming is a WMD?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27289/Global%2Dwarming%2Dis%2Da%2DWMD</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://politics.guardian.co.uk/green/comment/0,9236,1007302,00.html"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Global warming is now a weapon of mass destruction.&lt;/a&gt; It kills more people than terrorism, yet Blair and Bush do nothing.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  So writes Sir John Houghton, former chief executive of the &lt;a href=http://www.met-office.gov.uk/&gt;Meteorological Office&lt;/a&gt; and co-chair of the scientific assessment working group of the &lt;a href=http://www.ipcc.ch/&gt;Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27289</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<category>intergovernmentalpanelonclimatechange</category>
		<category>johnhoughton</category>
		<category>meteorology</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Trailers of rumoured, vague threat?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26157/Trailers%2Dof%2Drumoured%2Dvague%2Dthreat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.digitalmediatree.com/onelap/?22489"&gt;&quot;Trailers of Mass destruction&quot;&lt;/a&gt; : By Wolfowitz Productions, starring Kris Kristofferson and Ali MacGraw. A red hot tale of sex, intrigue and death. (scroll to bottom of page). Amidst the controversy over Wolfowitz&apos;s admissions in a  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/053103A.shtml&quot;&gt;Vanity Fair&lt;/a&gt; interview about the use of Iraq&apos;s alleged WMD threat as a pretext for war, Hollywood comes to the rescue!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26157</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 08:13:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>trailers</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This just in -- now the mainstream media knows what everyone else does!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25605/This%2Djust%2Din%2Dnow%2Dthe%2Dmainstream%2Dmedia%2Dknows%2Dwhat%2Deveryone%2Delse%2Ddoes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/abs_news_body.asp?section=Opinion&amp;amp;oid=22357"&gt;Did Bush know?&lt;/a&gt; An article in today&apos;s New York Times (link to mirrored site with no reg. req.) pieces together data that the author claims proves that Bush and his inner circle were well-aware that they were using false &quot;evidence&quot; of Iraqi WMD.  Sy Hersh from the &lt;i&gt;New Yorker &lt;/i&gt;is also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030331fa_fact1&quot;&gt;chiming in&lt;/a&gt;, as is Salon&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2003/05/06/kristof/index.html&quot;&gt;Joe Connason&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030519&amp;s=pollitt&quot;&gt;Katha Pollitt &lt;/a&gt;of &lt;i&gt;The Nation&lt;/i&gt;.  A pretty decent subsection of media is finally descending on this story.  If Bush or Powell or Rumsfeld are proven to have been knowingly deceitful, will the American public be even half as angry as the rest of the world?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25605</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 12:11:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>joeconnason</category>
		<category>kathapollitt</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20164/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2269462.stm"&gt;US threat to [wait for it..] &lt;i&gt;stop&lt;/i&gt; Iraq inspections&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Ri-iiiight.


What was that about giving clear and determined leadership to the world?

About the need for &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1677723.stm&quot; title=&quot;&amp; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2237533.stm President George W Bush is reported to be considering asking for a UN Security Council resolution that would set a deadline for weapons inspections to resume in Iraq. &quot;&gt;&quot;Mr Saddam Hussein ...  to let inspectors back in his country to show us that he is not developing weapons of mass destruction&quot;&lt;/a&gt;?

That man is making a fool of his government, policies and his own people. What next?

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20164</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:01:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>UNinspections</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>dash_slot-</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


