<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with wmd and weaponsofmassdestruction</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/wmd+weaponsofmassdestruction</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'wmd' and 'weaponsofmassdestruction' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:30:25 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:30:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Nope, no weapons over there...maybe under here?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36068/Nope%2Dno%2Dweapons%2Dover%2Dtheremaybe%2Dunder%2Dhere</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/index.html"&gt;Iraq&apos;s WMD capability was essentially destroyed in 1991,&lt;/a&gt; according to the report by the chief U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36068</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:30:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>WeaponsInspection</category>
		<category>WeaponsOfMassDestruction</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Clinton believes Iraq had weapons of mass destruction: Portugal PM</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30632/Clinton%2Dbelieves%2DIraq%2Dhad%2Dweapons%2Dof%2Dmass%2Ddestruction%2DPortugal%2DPM</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spacewar.com/2004/040109015020.8ivyabdw.html"&gt;Clinton believes Iraq had weapons of mass destruction: Portugal PM&lt;/a&gt; Ok. The Dems and the GOP. But what did Ralph Nader say about WMD?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30632</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:41:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billclinton</category>
		<category>dems</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>portugal</category>
		<category>presidentclinton</category>
		<category>primeminister</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestruction</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>President confirms link between Saddam Hussein and terrorism!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28506/President%2Dconfirms%2Dlink%2Dbetween%2DSaddam%2DHussein%2Dand%2Dterrorism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/58/statements/usaeng030923.htm"&gt;President &lt;s&gt;confirms&lt;/s&gt; &lt;s&gt;denies&lt;/s&gt; confirms link between Iraq and terrorism!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot; The regime of Saddam Hussein cultivated ties to terror while it built weapons of mass destruction.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

In other news, we&apos;re at war with Eastasia. We&apos;ve always been at war with Eastasia... Food rations have jumped by 10%! Doubleplusgood!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28506</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeneralAssembly</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Hussein</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>Saddam</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>UnitedNations</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>WeaponsofMassDestruction</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dude, where&apos;s my WMD?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28156/Dude%2Dwheres%2Dmy%2DWMD</link>
		<description> So, how to explain the incorrect allegations about Iraqi WMD?  Lies?  Self-interest?  Ideology?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030906.wweap0906/BNStory/International/&quot;&gt;Clerical error&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28156</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bookkeeping</category>
		<category>CaususBelli</category>
		<category>clerical</category>
		<category>ClericalError</category>
		<category>GlobeAndMail</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>WeaponsOfMassDestruction</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S. says Iraq may have junked toxic arms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26027/US%2Dsays%2DIraq%2Dmay%2Dhave%2Djunked%2Dtoxic%2Darms</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/generic.cgi?template=articleprint.tmplh&amp;amp;ArticleId=97762"&gt;U.S. says Iraq may have junked toxic arms&lt;/a&gt; Thus spake Rummy in a speech. We know they have them. If we can not find them it is because they got rid of them. But that still means they had them at one time, right?
Question: what are those top scientists and Bath party members telling their captors wherever they are being held for questioning?  Or is too important to reveal too.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26027</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 09:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestruction</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>UN finds no banned weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22532/UN%2Dfinds%2Dno%2Dbanned%2Dweapons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2607971.stm"&gt;UN finds no banned weapons&lt;/a&gt;  - that&apos;s a relief. Now the only &quot;weapons of mass destruction&quot; in the current debacle are owned by the US i.e. 27 stealth bombers, capable of completely destroying much of the world in just a few seconds.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22532</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2002 17:53:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestruction</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8378/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/588538.asp"&gt;&quot;I had no idea we had so many weapons,&quot; he said. &quot;What do we need them for?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The U.S. nuclear arsenal today includes 5,400 warheads loaded on intercontinental ballistic missiles at land and sea; an additional 1,750 nuclear bombs and cruise missiles ready to be launched from B-2 and B-52 bombers; a further 1,670 nuclear weapons classified as &#8220;tactical.&#8221; And just in case, an additional 10,000 or so nuclear warheads held in bunkers around the United States as a &#8220;hedge&#8221; against future surprises.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8378</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>b-2</category>
		<category>b-52</category>
		<category>ballistic</category>
		<category>bomb</category>
		<category>bunker</category>
		<category>intercontinental</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nucleararsenal</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>warheads</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestruction</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


