<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with women and abortion</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/women+abortion</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'women' and 'abortion' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:09:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:09:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Witness to a womb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80081/Witness%2Dto%2Da%2Dwomb</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/09/md-va-consider-abortion-measure/&quot;&gt;Sixteen states&lt;/a&gt; already have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RFU.pdf&quot;&gt;laws &lt;/a&gt; [PDF] related to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0515/p03s03-ussc.html&quot;&gt;abortion ultrasounds &lt;/a&gt;.  Eleven more states have recently introduced bills that demand that a woman who wants an abortion be forced to look at the ultrasound, while a doctor describes what she is seeing.  All of these bills are because the legislators believe that adoption is the only choice a woman should make.  This essay, &lt;a href=&quot;http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/03/breaking-silence-on-living-pro-lifers.html&quot;&gt;On Living Pro-Lifer&apos;s Choice for Women&lt;/a&gt;, explores the difficulties faced by birth mothers who choose that path.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80081</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:09:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>adoption</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>reproductiverights</category>
		<category>ultrasound</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>womenshealth</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Partial-Birth Abortion Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61006/PartialBirth%2DAbortion%2DBan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20070501_mcclain.html"&gt;New Justices, New Rules:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20070507_mcclain.html&gt;How the Supreme Court&apos;s Validation of the Federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act Affects Women&apos;s Constitutional Liberty and Equality.&lt;/a&gt;  A two-part FindLaw analysis of &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/60393/Abortions-for-none-miniature-American-flags-for-others&gt;Gonzales v. Carhart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61006</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 21:25:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abortion</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Health</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>SCOTUS</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>Women</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>what you need right now isn&apos;t the righteous anger the rest of the blogosphere will give you. You need more.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49534/what%2Dyou%2Dneed%2Dright%2Dnow%2Disnt%2Dthe%2Drighteous%2Danger%2Dthe%2Drest%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dblogosphere%2Dwill%2Dgive%2Dyou%2DYou%2Dneed%2Dmore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mollysavestheday.blogspot.com/2006/02/for-women-of-south-dakota-abortion.html"&gt;For the women of South Dakota: an abortion manual&lt;/a&gt; --building on the history and expertise of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cwluherstory.com/CWLUFeature/feature.html&quot;&gt;Jane, , an underground referral and abortion-providing group in Chicago in the 60s, &lt;/a&gt; Molly provides the vital info women in South Dakota (and maybe elsewhere soon) need.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49534</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:28:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...respecting and defending the life and dignity of every human being...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48469/respecting%2Dand%2Ddefending%2Dthe%2Dlife%2Dand%2Ddignity%2Dof%2Devery%2Dhuman%2Dbeing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Roe/"&gt;Roe v. Wade,&lt;/a&gt; 33 years old today. With abortion back in the news due to the Supreme Court nomination of Alito, will the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/01/08/MNGHGGK8O81.DTL&quot;&gt;Ideological Rumble&lt;/a&gt; over the issue ever be settled or are we doomed to see questionable declarations like today&apos;s recognition of  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060120-5.html&quot;&gt;&quot;National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2006&quot;&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;i&gt;...creating a society where every life has meaning...&lt;/i&gt;-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/22/175228/539&quot;&gt;every life? Really?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48469</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:47:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>choice</category>
		<category>Court</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Should a doctor be able to refuse to help patients?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35675/Should%2Da%2Ddoctor%2Dbe%2Dable%2Dto%2Drefuse%2Dto%2Dhelp%2Dpatients</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/HEALTH/09/15/abortion.refusals.ap/index.html"&gt;Conscience Clauses and Health Care&lt;/a&gt; --&lt;i&gt;&quot;Yes, we need to respect individual freedom of religion. But at what point does it cross the line of not providing essential medical care? At what point is it malpractice?&quot; she asked. &quot;If someone&apos;s beliefs interfere with practicing their profession, perhaps they should do something else.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consciencelaws.org/&quot;&gt; The Protection of Conscience Project&lt;/a&gt; feels differently: &lt;i&gt;Protection of Conscience Laws are needed because powerful interests are inclined to force health care workers and others to participate, directly or indirectly, in morally controversial procedures&lt;/i&gt;, while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naral.org/facts/clauses.cfm&quot;&gt;NARAL says:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;... Many of these clauses go far beyond respecting individuals&apos; beliefs to the point of harming women by not providing them with full information or access to medical treatment. Medicine, not ideology, should determine medical decisions.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35675</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>birthcontrol</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conscience</category>
		<category>contraception</category>
		<category>doctors</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>malpractice</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>civil disobedience</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22080/civil%2Ddisobedience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thomasmoresociety.org/now_v_scheidler.htm"&gt;National Organization for Women v. Scheidler&lt;/a&gt; Is being heard by SCOTUS today. The case may decide whether non-violent civil disobedience can be prosecuted under federal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ricoact.com/&quot;&gt;RICO &lt;/a&gt;laws. Here&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.aclu.org/court/nowvscheidler.html&quot;&gt;ACLU&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; amicus brief. And comments from NRO&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://nationalreview.com/dreher/dreher120402.asp&quot;&gt;Rod Dreher&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22080</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:57:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>CivilDisobedience</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NOW</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>RICO</category>
		<category>Scheidler</category>
		<category>SCOTUS</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7662/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1325000/1325557.stm"&gt;&quot;Men Too&quot; abortion leaflet.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Men have no legal rights when it comes to abortion. 
Legally an abortion is a matter between a woman and her doctor - and this is as it should be. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7662</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2001 03:53:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>nonharmful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


