<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with women and men</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/women+men</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'women' and 'men' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:24:07 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:24:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>It&apos;s about improving the lives not only of women, but of men</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86506/Its%2Dabout%2Dimproving%2Dthe%2Dlives%2Dnot%2Donly%2Dof%2Dwomen%2Dbut%2Dof%2Dmen</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelkaufman.com/2009/04/19/appearance-on-mens-room/&quot;&gt;Video discussion on being a man&lt;/a&gt; with, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whiteribbon.ca/educational_materials/default.asp?load=seven&quot;&gt;The Seven P&apos;s of Men&apos;s Violence&lt;/a&gt; by, Michael Kaufman, International Director of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whiteribbon.ca/about_us/&quot;&gt;the White Ribbon Campaign&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/story/47080/&quot;&gt;Feminism Brings Benefits to All -- Men Included.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.safercampus.org/blog/?p=777&quot;&gt;Rethinking privilege?&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86506</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:24:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>manhood</category>
		<category>masculinity</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>michaelkaufman</category>
		<category>thewhiteribboncampaign</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>catchingsignals</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Domestic Violence: Women Abusers On The Rise?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82659/Domestic%2DViolence%2DWomen%2DAbusers%2DOn%2DThe%2DRise</link>
		<description> To date, focus of most research into Domestic Violence has been on instances of violence against women by men based on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.batteredmen.com/batdulut.htm&quot;&gt;arguably sexist premise&lt;/a&gt; that it is more prevalent than instances of violence by women against men. However &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm&quot;&gt;numerous books and studies&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PAU/is_1_6/ai_n27283525/?tag=content;col1&quot;&gt;have contradicted this premise, showing that men and women suffer domestic abuse in similar and sometimes equal rates&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this, preconceived ideas of gender roles still lead many to believe it would be virtually impossible for a woman to physically abuse a man, an attitude which Men&apos;s Rights advocates &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/22/2604559.htm?section=justin&quot;&gt;say often leads to many battered men hiding in shame, fearful of being ridiculed, or even prosecuted&lt;/a&gt;. Because men are less likely to report instances of DV perpetrated against them by women, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oregoncounseling.org/Handouts/DomesticViolenceMen.htm&quot;&gt;very little is known about the actual number of men who are in a domestic relationship in which they are abused or treated violently&lt;/a&gt;.  &quot;&lt;em&gt;In 100 domestic violence situations approximately 40 cases involve violence by women against men.  An estimated 400,000 women per year are abused or treated violently in the United States by their spouse or intimate partner.  This means that roughly 300,000 to 400,000 men are treated violently by their wife or girlfriend&lt;/em&gt;&quot;, although &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.batteredmen.com/&quot;&gt;one advocacy website&lt;/a&gt; puts the figure in the US alone at around 835,000. And it appears as though many women who batter men are better able to get away with their crime, &lt;a href=&quot;http://angiemedia.com/?p=2256&quot;&gt;with one site arguing that female DV offenders benefit from gender bias&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82659</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domesticviolence</category>
		<category>dv</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The opposite sex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79134/The%2Dopposite%2Dsex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://rasmusheise.dk/LM/"&gt;Lille&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0479293/&quot;&gt;Mand&lt;/a&gt; - Eight year old Mathis writes an essay for school entitled, &quot;How to Understand Women.&quot; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/11/little-man/&quot;&gt;Neatorama&lt;/a&gt;) (It will be slow to load.  Also, there is brief shower nudity so NSFW)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79134</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:05:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Cinema</category>
		<category>Film</category>
		<category>Men</category>
		<category>Sexes</category>
		<category>Women</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>If A Tree Falls in the Forest, The Man is Still Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78714/If%2DA%2DTree%2DFalls%2Din%2Dthe%2DForest%2DThe%2DMan%2Dis%2DStill%2DWrong</link>
		<description> Most wives are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parenting.com/article/Mom/Relationships/Mad-at-Dad&quot;&gt;Mad&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/mad-at-dad/?partner=rss&quot;&gt;Dad&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;We&apos;re mad that having children has turned our lives upside down much more than theirs. We&apos;re mad that these guys, who can manage businesses or keep track of thousands of pieces of sports trivia, can be clueless when it comes to what our kids are eating and what supplies they need for school. And more than anything else, we&apos;re mad that they get more time to themselves than we do.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78714</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:45:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anger</category>
		<category>childrearing</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Xurando</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Billionaires have more sons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78377/Billionaires%2Dhave%2Dmore%2Dsons</link>
		<description> Billionaires have more grandchildren through their sons than through their daughters, because the status advantage is more reproductively valuable to the sons. Therefore, it would be adaptive for the mothers of their children to bear more sons than daughters. But surely that can&apos;t be; mothers can&apos;t control the sex of their children. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004195&quot;&gt;Oh but so it is&lt;/a&gt;: billionaires have 60% male children. This exciting research finding partly validates &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/53570/More-Beautiful-Women-Than-Handsome-Men&quot;&gt;the work&lt;/a&gt; of LSE&apos;s seeming crackpot, Satoshi Kanazawa (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/56095/Dr-Kanazawa&quot;&gt;also previously&lt;/a&gt;). It&apos;s getting harder to deny that simple evolutionary hypotheses have a lot of power to describe human life. The worldview of this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm&quot;&gt;pithy essay&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/64034/The-Waw-effect&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) is looking more and more convincing. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78377</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:21:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adaptation</category>
		<category>billionaires</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>demographics</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>selection</category>
		<category>status</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Love in the Time of Darwinism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76636/Love%2Din%2Dthe%2DTime%2Dof%2DDarwinism</link>
		<description> Kay S. Hymowitz strikes again. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/68649/ChildMen&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;, she wrote an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_single_young_men.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; positing that &quot;that too many single young males (SYMs) were lingering in a hormonal limbo between adolescence and adulthood, shunning marriage and children, and whiling away their leisure hours with South Park reruns, marathon sessions of World of Warcraft, and Maxim lists of the ten best movie fart scenes.&quot;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_4_darwinist_dating.html&quot;&gt;Now she has a new thesis&lt;/a&gt;: That angry, disenfranchised single young men use &quot;Darwinist&quot; philosophy to justify &quot;resistance to settling down&quot; and &quot;unsentimental promiscuity&quot;. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aldaily.com/&quot;&gt;[via]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76636</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:55:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dating</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>shotgunbooty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Venus and Mars - not what we thought</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74750/Venus%2Dand%2DMars%2Dnot%2Dwhat%2Dwe%2Dthought</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/science/09tier.html?em"&gt;Why aren&apos;t men and women becoming more alike?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;A husband and a stay-at-home wife in a patriarchal Botswanan clan seem to be more alike than a working couple in Denmark or France. The more Venus and Mars have equal rights and similar jobs, the more their personalities seem to diverge.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradley.edu/academics/las/psy/facstaff/schmitt/laboratory.shtml&quot;&gt;International Sexuality Description Project findings.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74750</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:20:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>mars</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>venus</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Women and children, depending on credit rating</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74383/Women%2Dand%2Dchildren%2Ddepending%2Don%2Dcredit%2Drating</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.titanicinquiry.org/USInq/AmInq01Lightoller05.php&quot;&gt;Women and children&lt;/a&gt;, first,&quot; is a familiar cultural refrain, with its popular roots in the gallant sacrifice made by the male contingent aboard the doomed &lt;i&gt;Titanic&lt;/i&gt;. Their sacrifice has inspired &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.titanicsociety.com/readables/main/wc_04-12-2001_women_and_children_first_poem.asp&quot;&gt;poetry&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glts.org/memorials/dc/womens.html&quot;&gt;sculpture&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/community/clubs/titanic.htm&quot;&gt;male social clubs&lt;/a&gt;, and, of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_(1997_film)&quot;&gt;cinema&lt;/a&gt;. Yet, this sacrifice of near-mythic scale &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bitchmagazine.org/article/women-and-children&quot;&gt;was in some respects a myth&lt;/a&gt;, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anesi.com/titanic.htm&quot;&gt;survival statistics&lt;/a&gt; skewing well in favor of men of higher social and economic class than children (and, to a lesser extent, women) of lower status.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74383</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:29:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>chivalry</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>leonardo</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>myth</category>
		<category>mythology</category>
		<category>status</category>
		<category>titanic</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Locked up and blue</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73908/Locked%2Dup%2Dand%2Dblue</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/61/61womeninprison.html&quot; title=&quot;Men in Women-in-Prison by Noah Berlatsky....&apos;As most commentators on the genre have noted, women-in-prison films changed dramatically over the decades. In the thirties, forties, and fifties they were high-drama, weepy B melodramas; in the sixties and later they were sexploitation sleaze.1 That&apos;s a pretty unusual transformation. What happened?...What is the difference between B melodrama and sexploitation?&apos;&quot;&gt;Men in Women-in-Prison&lt;/a&gt; [Films]&lt;br&gt;&quot;This dynamic &#8212; of eroticized male exclusion from, and investment in, female relationships &#8212; was the defining feature of a handful of women-in-prison films from the 1970s. In these movies, female sisterhood, generally in the face of oppression, is itself fetishized &#8212; feminism is turned into a kind of masochistic male wet dream. How this unlikely cathexis occurred, and how it functioned, is the subject of this essay.&quot; Director &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0384335/bio&quot; title=&quot;Today his films are hailed as cult classics, thanks primarily to Quentin Tarantino, who saw Hill&apos;s work as it made its way to video.&quot;&gt;Jack Hill&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://hoodedutilitarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/jack-hill-talks-to-me.html&quot; title=&quot;Noah Berlatsky&apos;s blog, The Hooded Utilitarian&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;i&gt;The only things I do want to take unequivocal credit for on the record are Bobby [Roberta] Collins&apos; lines, &quot;Get it up or I&apos;ll cut it off,&quot; which invariably brought down the house; and &quot;Hah! Now I&apos;m in my own natural element,&quot; when she falls into the mud, which, strangely, didn&apos;t even get many laughs. And then, a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sidhaig.com/viewpage.php?page_id=11&quot; title=&quot;Sid Haig&apos;s homepage, with clips from his movies!&quot;&gt;Sid Haig&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; business, of course.&lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73908</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:08:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>sexploitation</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Taking them off feels like an orgasm.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73728/Taking%2Dthem%2Doff%2Dfeels%2Dlike%2Dan%2Dorgasm</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://jezebel.com/5030602/we-challenge-a-man-to-walk-a-mile-in-our-heels&quot;&gt;Walking a mile &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://jezebel.com/5031032/we-challenge-a-man-to-walk-a-mile-in-our-heels-part-2&quot;&gt;in our heels.&lt;/a&gt; If you&apos;d like to try it yourself, &lt;a href=&quot;http://highheelspassion.blogspot.com/2007/11/how-to-walk-in-high-heels.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; are some handy pointers. 
&lt;small&gt;Just be forewarned:  after a few minutes your feet may feel like bloody stumps, but your calves will look &lt;i&gt;irresistably fabulous.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73728</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:19:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>feminine</category>
		<category>femininity</category>
		<category>heels</category>
		<category>high</category>
		<category>highheels</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>mile</category>
		<category>pain</category>
		<category>shoes</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>miss lynnster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Boring men?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72632/Boring%2Dmen</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/print/1040&quot; title=&quot;Economist - Intelligent Life Magazine - Are Men Boring?&quot;&gt;Are men boring?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72632</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>boring</category>
		<category>conversation</category>
		<category>economist</category>
		<category>intelligentlife</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>djgh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Let it blaze! Let it blaze! For we have done with this &#8216;education&#8217;!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69335/Let%2Dit%2Dblaze%2DLet%2Dit%2Dblaze%2DFor%2Dwe%2Dhave%2Ddone%2Dwith%2Dthis%2D%3Feducation%3F</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/books/Virginia-Woolf-Three-Guineas.html&quot;&gt;Virginia Woolf&lt;/a&gt;: A feminist&apos;s view on why we go to war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69335</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:23:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Education</category>
		<category>Feminism</category>
		<category>Honour</category>
		<category>Men</category>
		<category>Patriotism</category>
		<category>Society</category>
		<category>VirginiaWoolf</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>Women</category>
		<dc:creator>hadjiboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fear(less)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68938/Fearless</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heart-2-heart.ca/men/page4.html&quot;&gt;Why&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://gleez.com/blog/flickalanie/mens-fear&quot;&gt;Real&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.students.haverford.edu/masar/documents/Fear_of_Men.pdf&quot;&gt;Men&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newscafe.ansci.usu.edu/archive/feb2001/0205_violence1.html&quot;&gt;Don&apos;t&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug99/youth.html&quot;&gt;Cry&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXR3YdA3cjc&quot;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; On &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/12/maybe-men-can-c.html&quot;&gt; the&lt;/a&gt; other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womensmedia.com/new/Clark-Nancy-New-York-Times.shtml&quot;&gt; hand&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68938</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Boys</category>
		<category>Emotions</category>
		<category>Expressions</category>
		<category>Feelings</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>Men</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>Sensitivity</category>
		<category>sterotyping</category>
		<category>Vulnerability</category>
		<category>Women</category>
		<dc:creator>hadjiboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I Can&apos;t Do That Dave, now put your pants back on</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68779/I%2DCant%2DDo%2DThat%2DDave%2Dnow%2Dput%2Dyour%2Dpants%2Dback%2Don</link>
		<description> In what may be the silliest poll ever taken, British women say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article720279.ece&quot;&gt;Men Named Dave are Most Likely to be &quot;Well Endowed&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. There&apos;s a whole &quot;Top 10&quot; and &quot;Bottom 10&quot; list of names... see how &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; stack up. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onepoll.com/&quot;&gt;The people who did the survey&lt;/a&gt; do this kind of thing for companies to get publicity. It works pretty well. This one was done for an online dating company, UK Dating, but the pollster got most of the publicity. Previously, for the same client, they surveyed for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onepoll.com/press_detail.php?id=271&quot;&gt;Names of Men Most Likely to Cheat&lt;/a&gt; (very UK-centric result). A beverage company commissioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onepoll.com/press_detail.php?id=278&quot;&gt;The Most Common Lies&lt;/a&gt; and they&apos;ve done a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onepoll.com/press.php&quot;&gt;other mostly useless surveys&lt;/a&gt;.

Please note that Matt and Wendell did not appear on either list (but my condolences to Josh, #7 on the &quot;little&quot; list). </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68779</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 02:43:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>size</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What goes around, comes around...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65721/What%2Dgoes%2Daround%2Dcomes%2Daround</link>
		<description> Chasing women will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9982969&quot;&gt;take years off of your life.&lt;/a&gt; But hey, things always even out somehow. You&apos;ll just return the favor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&amp;articleID=FAEB4508-E7F2-99DF-329AA2F69CCB6D5C&amp;colID=30&quot;&gt;to your poor, innocent mother.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65721</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>economist</category>
		<category>lifespan</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>scientific</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>miss lynnster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Barry White Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65187/The%2DBarry%2DWhite%2DEffect</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.languagelog.com&quot;&gt;Language Log&lt;/a&gt; is a great linguistics blog I have been reading, and I thought that Metafilter might be interested in these posts about sex differences in language use.  The (less-technical) articles to which the bloggers are responding are all within the responses, so I didn&apos;t link to them.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004974.html&quot;&gt;The Barry White Effect (voice pitch seems to correlate with reproduction)&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003607.html&quot;&gt;Gabby Guys (men talk more than women)&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002629.html&quot;&gt;Young Men Talk Like Old Women (usage of certain words)&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/archives/000873.html&quot;&gt;Gender and Tags (&quot;Certainly we don&apos;t seem to find real women and men as sums of the characteristics attributed to them&quot;)&lt;/a&gt;  Are any of these differences actually caused by the speakers sex?  The really fascinating thing, to me, is how unbelievably hard it is to study such a distinction.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65187</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:36:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>difference</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>Vs.</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>MNDZ</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Return of Patriarchy by Phillip Longman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60640/The%2DReturn%2Dof%2DPatriarchy%2Dby%2DPhillip%2DLongman</link>
		<description> &#8220;With the number of human beings having increased more than six-fold in the past 200 years, the modern mind simply assumes that men and women . . . will always breed enough children to grow the population . . . Yet, for more than a generation now, well-fed, healthy, peaceful populations around the world have been producing too few children to avoid population decline.  . . . &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_return_of_patriarchy&quot;&gt;Throughout the broad sweep of human history, there are many examples of people, or classes of people, who chose to avoid the costs of parenthood.&lt;/a&gt;  Indeed, falling fertility is a recurring tendency of human civilization.  Why then did humans not become extinct long ago?  The short answer is patriarchy.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60640</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:10:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Demographics</category>
		<category>Fertility</category>
		<category>Men</category>
		<category>Patriarchy</category>
		<category>PhillipLongman</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Women</category>
		<dc:creator>jason&apos;s_planet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ask A Man?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55671/Ask%2DA%2DMan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://askaman.net/"&gt;Ask A Man?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;You have come to the right place for love, relationship and dating advice.  Ask a man will provide you with the love, relationship and dating answers you seek.  Our staff of amazing men have agreed to break the &quot;man code&quot; and tell you the absolute truth about what your man is really saying to you.&quot;  For example:  &quot;Men want respect.  In a man&apos;s world, men are nothing without respect.  In a relationship, a man needs to know his woman respects him. &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55671</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:51:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bees</category>
		<category>birds</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>relationships</category>
		<category>thecode</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Perihelion</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53728/Perihelion</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/06/MNG3HKAMVO1.DTL"&gt;Text messaging for teenage girls is like an orgasm&lt;/a&gt; explains neuropsychiatrist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucsf.edu/brizlab/&quot;&gt;Louann Brizendine&lt;/a&gt;.  The doctor from Yale provides the science behind &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;list_uids=10601007&amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;why&lt;/a&gt; male and female &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4183166.stm&quot;&gt;brains&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=00018E9D-879D-1D06-8E49809EC588EEDF&quot;&gt;different&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/education/09college.html?ex=1310097600&amp;en=3d76d5cb595a4595&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;architecture&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/us/06marry.html?ex=1312516800&amp;en=f84cab1c1e8ae968&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;chemical&lt;/a&gt; composition.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53728</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:56:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>LouannBrizendine</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>The Jesse Helms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>(some) books are for girls</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50804/some%2Dbooks%2Dare%2Dfor%2Dgirls</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/generalfiction/story/0,,1748085,00.html"&gt;Gender differences in literary taste -&lt;/a&gt; The Guardian (inter alia) has been reporting two English professors&apos; studies of reading habits and feelings about books by gender. Others (newest to oldest): &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,1747821,00.html&quot;&gt;most revelatory books by reader gender (for men)&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,5081823-99819,00.html&quot;&gt;(for women)&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1494932,00.html&quot;&gt;author gender by reader gender&lt;/a&gt;. The methodology may not be unassailable but the findings are interesting and plausible. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marginalrevolution.com/&quot;&gt;[viaduct vianochicken]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Sidenote: I did a little research following a comment on MR and reached a non-obvious conclusion: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047478/ratings#reports&quot;&gt;wo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042876/ratings#reports&quot;&gt;men&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055630/ratings#reports&quot;&gt;hate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056443/ratings#reports&quot;&gt;Akira&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044741/ratings#reports&quot;&gt;Kurosawa&lt;/a&gt; (check out those charts; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/ratings#reports&quot;&gt;for comparison&lt;/a&gt;). Theories welcome.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50804</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:28:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>akira</category>
		<category>authors</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>kurosawa</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>reading</category>
		<category>vianochicken</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Body image and sex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50140/Body%2Dimage%2Dand%2Dsex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=39502"&gt;Body Image Relates Differently To Sexual Risks Taken By Men And Women.&lt;/a&gt; Males with positive body image may seek multiple sexual partners and engage in unprotected sex.

Women, on the other hand, may use the confidence that comes from a positive body image to resist multiple partners and insist that a condom be used when they do engage in sex.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50140</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:49:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>body</category>
		<category>confidence</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yahoo&apos;s top 100</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46273/Yahoos%2Dtop%2D100</link>
		<description> No list that puts MeFi at &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-men/7.html&quot;&gt;#55&lt;/a&gt; is perfect, but Yahoo&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-men/index.html&quot;&gt;100 Sites for Men&lt;/a&gt; includes lots of other goldmines, like an info source for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afraidtoask.com/&quot;&gt;embarassing problems&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hungover.net/&quot;&gt;hangover cures&lt;/a&gt;, and other gems like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drawyourboss.com/&quot;&gt;Draw Your Boss&lt;/a&gt;. 
Ladies, don&apos;t miss the top 100&lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-women/index.html&quot;&gt; Sites for Women&lt;/a&gt;, and if anyone&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballofpaint.freehosting.net/&quot;&gt;Ball of Paint&lt;/a&gt; needs are unfulfilled, you can always check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-weird/index.html&quot;&gt;Top 100 Weird Sites&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46273</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>links</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>BuddhaInABucket</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So She&apos;s Holding Out?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46084/So%2DShes%2DHolding%2DOut</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/stories/2004/08/13/introduction.html"&gt;Why Your Wife Won&apos;t Have Sex with You.&lt;/a&gt; That quack Dr. Phil says that while sex is only 10% of a marriage, it&apos;s 90% when you&apos;re not getting it.  Or words to that effect.  There&apos;s some truth to that.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/stories/2004/08/13/introduction.html&quot;&gt;This site &lt;/a&gt;discusses, from woman&apos;s point of view, why a wife might not feel like sex--often for years at a time.  She also goes into greater detail (with insights taken from her own life and experience) such issues as &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/stories/2004/08/12/distraction.html&quot;&gt;some &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/stories/2004/08/12/insecurity.html &lt;/a &quot;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/stories/2004/08/17/infidelity.html&quot;&gt;causes&lt;/a&gt; and what a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/stories/2004/08/12/beingTheHeroOfYourOwnLife.html&quot;&gt;man can do.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46084</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:09:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>libido</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>SexDrive</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>John of Michigan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A mouse is no substitute</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41300/A%2Dmouse%2Dis%2Dno%2Dsubstitute</link>
		<description> (all links safe for work) &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin&quot;&gt;Some&lt;/a&gt; once hypothesized that as pornography became more accessible and more mainstream, men in turn would become uncontrollable, ravenous sexual beasts. I always thought this myself: a man will see something in porn that a real woman won&apos;t give him&#8212;Internet porn now caters in a click to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0924/p02s01-ussc.html&quot;&gt;every fetish you can imagine&lt;/a&gt;&#8212;and he will find a way to get it. 
&lt;br&gt;&amp;#0160;&lt;br&gt;
My ex-girlfriend, observant and intelligent beyond her years, always used to tell me the opposite: it wouldn&apos;t turn men into beasts, having their way with every woman they saw. No, it would turn them away from women completely, libidos and their ability to connect with &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; females weakened by the hardcore acts and impossible bodies that only porn stars could give them. The porn would crave some intrinsic desire, but leave both people in the couple lonelier and less fulfulled. 
&lt;br&gt;&amp;#0160;&lt;br&gt;
Now I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9437/index.html&quot;&gt;she was absolutely right.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41300</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:45:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>libido</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>symphonik</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Schoolgirls Unite!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39436/Schoolgirls%2DUnite</link>
		<description> &lt;b&gt;Single-Sex Education&lt;/b&gt; When WNYC&apos;s &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=http://wnyc.org/shows/lopate/episodes/02012005&gt;Leonard Lopate Show&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; decided to &lt;a href=http://wnyc.org/stream/ram.py?file=/lopate/lopate020105a.ra&gt;discuss&lt;/a&gt; (audio) the Summer&apos;s gender brouhaha, an interesting thing happened. The guest expected to support gender difference interpretations, Dr. Sax, and the guest expected to discuss structural challenges to women in the sciences, Dr. Bell, agreed on one solution: single-sex education. As the AP noted last summer, &lt;a href=http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2004/08/24/more_states_offer_single_sex_schools/&gt;single-sex public education&lt;/a&gt; is up. Though some &lt;a href=http://www.aauw.org/takeaction/policyissues/single_sex.cfm&gt;object&lt;/a&gt; on the basis that &lt;a href=http://www.aclu.org/WomensRights/WomensRights.cfm?ID=10481&amp;c=174&gt;separate&lt;/a&gt; is never equal, Dr. Sax&apos;s organization claims both &lt;a href=http://www.singlesexschools.org/adboys.html&gt;boys&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.singlesexschools.org/adgirls.html&gt;girls&lt;/a&gt; see definite results. And even if you don&apos;t agree with Dr. Sax&apos;s reasoning, he says &lt;a href=http://www.singlesexschools.org/evidence.html&gt;the studies are on his side.&lt;/a&gt; After all, girls schools have given us awesome ladies like Rosa Parks, Sally Ride, and me.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39436</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>single-sex</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>dame</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


