<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with work and productivity</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/work+productivity</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'work' and 'productivity' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:45:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:45:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;Boss, this is good for the company!&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80523/Boss%2Dthis%2Dis%2Dgood%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dcompany</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://uninews.unimelb.edu.au/news/5750/&quot;&gt;A new university of Melbourne study finds that surfing the web at work can actually boost rather than hurt productivity, even when the content is not work related.&lt;/a&gt;  Finally I have an excuse for why I am &quot;always looking at that blue site.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80523</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:45:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DrBrentCoker</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>productivity</category>
		<category>study</category>
		<category>UniversityofMelbourne</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>Bango Skank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Interestingly, I&apos;m reading Lifehacker while posting this</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74295/Interestingly%2DIm%2Dreading%2DLifehacker%2Dwhile%2Dposting%2Dthis</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200711/multitasking&quot;&gt;Multitasking messes with the brain in several ways.&lt;/a&gt; At the most basic level, the mental balancing acts that it requires&#8212;the constant switching and pivoting&#8212;energize regions of the brain that specialize in visual processing and physical coordination and simultaneously appear to shortchange some of the higher areas related to memory and learning. We concentrate on the act of concentration at the expense of whatever it is that we&#8217;re supposed to be concentrating on.&quot; Also:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apa.org/releases/multitasking.html&quot;&gt;Shifting mental gears costs time&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://zenhabits.net/2007/02/how-not-to-multitask-work-simpler-and/&quot;&gt;How not to multi-task&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2008/05/25/the-multitasking-virus-and-the-end-of-learning-part-1/&quot;&gt;The multi-tasking virus&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.vt.edu/resmag/ResearchMagJan06/multitask.html&quot;&gt;Multi-tasking and driving&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-myth-of-multitasking&quot;&gt;The myth of multi-tasking&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/american-standard-bathroom-habits-survey,511260.shtml&quot;&gt;Multi-tasking in the toilet&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74295</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:29:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>multitasking</category>
		<category>productivity</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>jbickers</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>If Wasting Time is Time Well Spent, My Time on Metafilter is All Worthwhile</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61703/If%2DWasting%2DTime%2Dis%2DTime%2DWell%2DSpent%2DMy%2DTime%2Don%2DMetafilter%2Dis%2DAll%2DWorthwhile</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/fashion/31work.html?ref=fashion"&gt;&quot;Wasting time gets a bad rap&quot;,&lt;/a&gt; says Lisa Belkin in today&apos;s NYTimes, who argues that time often considered &quot;unproductive&quot; or &quot;wasted&quot; in today&apos;s workaholic culture is actually time well spent- &lt;i&gt;&quot;Over the years I have come to see that the hours away from the writing are the time when the real work gets done.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/time-wasted-perhaps-its-well-spent/&quot;&gt;Readers seem to agree&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61703</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>employment</category>
		<category>lisabelkin</category>
		<category>productivity</category>
		<category>time</category>
		<category>timemanagement</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>ThePinkSuperhero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8326/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.com/releases/uoa-swm061101.html"&gt;A study&lt;/a&gt; from researchers at the University of Alberta concludes that unhappy workers perform their tasks at the same rate as happy workers, but with about half as many errors (more inside).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8326</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>happiness</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>productivity</category>
		<category>study</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<category>workers</category>
		<dc:creator>hazyjane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


