Those of you who added reams of ad-blocking software to your PC's in the last two years, almost solely to block ads for the X10 wireless cam
, may be shocked (gasp!) to find out that they weren't paying for the ads the whole time
. In a dramatic and satisfying turnaround, X10's ad providers have sued them to the tune of 4.1 million USD.
When lamers sue lamers, everyone wins!
posted by poorhaus
on Oct 22, 2003 -
I am really, really, really
tired of the popups for the Tiny Wireless Video Camera
- the ad that always has a picture of a hot chick and trumpets "FITS ANYWHERE" (in the girls' bathroom, wink nudge.
If there are any browser coders listening, here's a feature I long for: an anti-bookmark list. Stumble on a page that pops up garbage like the above, add it to your anti-bookmarks list and it's locked out instantly and forever, no forgiveness, no rehabilitation, capital punishment for bad web pages. Yes, yes, I know about junkbuster and webwasherand hosts files. But at this late date crap lockout should be part of the browser the way kill files were (and are) part of newsreaders. Sic 'em, Fang.
posted by jfuller
on Jul 11, 2001 -
Follow the link to a post at the beloved-by-all-metafilterians Jason Levine
read the fourth paragraph: it seems that i'm not the only one highly ticked off by the recent slew of x10 pop-under ads.
Jason has kindly provided links that will set cookies to prevent them from appearing for 30 days, 1 year or 10 years.
I modified the url yet again to keep it from popping up ever again within my lifetime
posted by o2b
on Jun 2, 2001 -
Can someone please tell me why X10.com has such warm and fuzzy 'family' style pages
to describe their wireless camera, but their ads look
like they are promoting cameras for the sole purpose of catching beautiful women on screen? Are they promoting hidden cameras in bathrooms, changing stalls, and other privacy-robbing public places? Why the descrepency between their advertising and their site?
posted by mathowie
on Jan 4, 2000 -