<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with x30</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/x30</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'x30' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:59:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:59:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Plane? What plane?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49808/Plane%2DWhat%2Dplane</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/030606p1.xml"&gt;Blackstar to orbit?&lt;/a&gt; Aviation Week &amp;amp; Space Technology reports in its most recent issue that a two-stage-to-orbit system may have been declared operational during the 1990s. The Blackstar system appears to have heritage from three other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aiaa.org/aerospace/Article.cfm?issuetocid=154&amp;ArchiveIssueID=20&quot;&gt;X-Planes&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astronautix.com/craft/dynasoar.htm&quot;&gt;X-20&lt;/a&gt; Dynasoar, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.labiker.org/xb70.html&quot;&gt;XB-70&lt;/a&gt; Valkyrie, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/x30.htm&quot;&gt;X-30&lt;/a&gt; National Aerospace Plane. [Related MeFi &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/23254&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;] [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasawatch.com/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49808</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:59:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>spaceplane</category>
		<category>x20</category>
		<category>x30</category>
		<category>xb70</category>
		<dc:creator>Fat Guy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>History of (Failed) Shuttle Replacements</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23254/History%2Dof%2DFailed%2DShuttle%2DReplacements</link>
		<description> So, why hasn&apos;t the Shuttle been replaced?  Because it hasn&apos;t been easy.  In the late 80&apos;s and early &apos;90s, the cold-war-fantasy-cum-shuttle-replacement was the &lt;a title=&quot;Was the NASP really a 21st century strategic bomber or a new Shuttle? probably both...&quot; href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/irp/mystery/nasp.htm&quot;&gt;X-30 National Aerospace Plane (NASP)&lt;/a&gt; that was supposed to take off and land like a plane flying on super-fast &lt;a title=&quot;Super combusting ramjets are engines without moving parts that combust fuel-air mixtures flowing at supersonic speeds... yes, it&apos;s as hard as it sounds...&quot; href=&quot;http://www.aviation-history.com/engines/ramjet.htm&quot;&gt;Scramjet engines&lt;/a&gt; that, alas, were never really successful... 

In the late &apos;90s, the New Economy, space-exploration-on-VC-money shuttle replacement was the &lt;a _top title=&quot;This link has some nice diagrams and pictures&quot; href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/spp/guide/usa/launch/x-33.htm&quot;&gt;X-33 VentureStar&lt;/a&gt; program which was eventually &lt;a title=&quot;Along with the X-33, the less-glamorous but probably more useful X-34 was cancelled as well; the X-34 was an updated version of the Pegasus launch vehicle&quot; href=&quot;http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/x33_x34end.htm&quot;&gt;cancelled&lt;/a&gt;, after a long and turbulent &lt;a title=&quot;LONG but detailed and accurate post-mortem of the X-33/VentureStar effort&quot; href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=6dee564a.0301201205.9ec8fba%40posting.google.com&amp;output=gplain&quot;&gt;history&lt;/a&gt;.  The X-33/VentureStar was one of the most technologically daring machines ever built --albeit &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; daring.  I cannot mention the X-33 without mentioning the ingenious-but-untested &lt;a title=&quot;Regular rocket engines perform optimally only at or near sea level; aerospike engines OTOH should perform optimally at any altitude which means a lot less fuel and weight to carry to orbit&quot; href=&quot;http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/background/facts/aerospike.html&quot;&gt;linear aerospike engine&lt;/a&gt; that was going to take it to orbit.  If the US is now (again) considering a Shuttle replacement, maybe the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/x-33/dc-xa.htm&quot; title=&quot;Yes, this spacecraft was actually built at 1/3 scale and flown succesfully, even though it looks like it came off a bad sci-fi movie&quot;&gt;Delta Clipper&lt;/a&gt; is worth a second look.  The DC-X was a competitor for the X-33 program that was eventually scrapped, for &lt;a title=&quot;True, the DC-XA exploded on a landing attempt, and there were concerns about its reliance on software for maneuverability; but at least the Clipper flew before it even lost the X-33 competition, whereas the VentureStar didn&apos;t, ever...&quot; href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;safe=off&amp;threadm=34D4FC26.1EAB%40bellsouth.net&amp;rnum=5&amp;prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26safe%3Doff%26selm%3D34D4FC26.1EAB%2540bellsouth.net%26rnum%3D5&quot;&gt;technological and other reasons&lt;/a&gt;.  At least the Russians and Europeans liked it so much better than the other New Shuttle options that they &lt;a title=&quot;The paper (Google cache) introduces an early version of the ORYOL V7 vehicle (a DC-X knock-off) which was never-built for reasons I couldn&apos;t find out; probably cost and reliance on complex avionics that the Russians aren&apos;t too comfortable with as a rule&quot; href=&quot;http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:cxBJ2Sd87wMC:www.spacefuture.com/archive/a_cost_engineered_launch_vehicle_for_space_tourism.shtml+oryol+rocket&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&quot;&gt;copied it&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23254</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:30:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aerospike</category>
		<category>delta_clipper</category>
		<category>shuttle</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>x30</category>
		<dc:creator>costas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


