<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with yahoo and GeorgeWBush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/yahoo+GeorgeWBush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'yahoo' and 'GeorgeWBush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>More PR...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45859/More%2DPR</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq"&gt;Bush teleconference with troops staged.&lt;/a&gt; Nothing in the article says &lt;i&gt;who&lt;/i&gt; is responsible for organizing the staged question and answer session, The White House, military officials, or others in the defense department. Just that it infact was staged, and that the troops were coached for 45 minutes prior to the actual teleconference. When Bush, in an unscripted move, asked an officer if he had anything to say, he stammered through a sentence, in stark contrast to the well put together responses to all the other questions, thanking the President and saying, &quot;I like you.&quot; More PR from the Bush administration.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45859</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>PublicRelations</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>teleconference</category>
		<category>troops</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>SirOmega</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Women are &quot;evildoers&quot; too.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36268/Women%2Dare%2Devildoers%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=519&amp;amp;ncid=519&amp;amp;e=23&amp;amp;u=/ap/20041014/ap_on_re_us/un_population_agenda"&gt;U.S. refuses to join U.N. plan for women&lt;/a&gt; From AP via Yahoo:  &lt;em&gt;UNITED NATIONS - The United States has refused to join 85 other heads of state and government in signing a statement that endorsed a 10-year-old U.N. plan to ensure every woman&apos;s right to education, health care, and choice about having children. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;

 and
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;President Bush&apos;s administration withheld its signature because the statement included a reference to &quot;&lt;strong&gt;sexual rights&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>SexualRights</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>UnitedNations</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WomensRights</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17852/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;ncid=716&amp;amp;e=8&amp;amp;cid=578&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020616/ts_nm/attack_bush_iraq_dc_1"&gt;Why&lt;/a&gt; , &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/767687.asp&quot;&gt;why&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/06/16/iraq.bush.reut/index.html&quot;&gt;why&lt;/a&gt;?  Bush vs. Saddam.  Prequel to Desert Storm II.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17852</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2002 09:14:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>MSNBC</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>password</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15453/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020312/ts_nm/attack_alert_dc_17&amp;amp;cid=578"&gt;White house announces more silly and vague schema&lt;/a&gt; for defining terrorist threat. Ok, so how does going from the total unclear status of &quot;everybody lookout, it&apos;s coming&quot; to Yellow Alert which means &quot;a significant risk of terrorist attacks&quot; make things more clear? For that matter what&apos;s the point of Red Alert anyhow? Is that for when the Pentagon is already on fire?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15453</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:41:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ColorCodes</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurityAdvisorySystem</category>
		<category>panic</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>TerrorAlert</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>shagoth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7069/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010417/ts/taxes_bush_dc_1.html"&gt;Texas gets good deal on Bush tax plan..&lt;/a&gt; my state and many others lose....Do I move to Texas or pay more to avoid it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7069</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4870/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001217/ts/election_oconnor_dc_1.html"&gt;Justice O&apos;Connor said &apos;&apos;this is terrible,&apos;&apos; when it looked like Gore had won the election&lt;/a&gt; But of course, politics played no role in her decision to hand the election to Bush.  Right?  right?  ?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4870</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>SandraDayOConnor</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Outlawyr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


