<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with zogby</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/zogby</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'zogby' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:54:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:54:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>John Ziegler vs. Nate Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76687/John%2DZiegler%2Dvs%2DNate%2DSilver</link>
		<description> You may have heard of John Ziegler.  A former right-wing talk radio host turned right-wing documentarian, he was once the subject of a well-known &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200504/wallace&quot;&gt;David Foster Wallace essay about conservative talk radio.&lt;/a&gt;  Ziegler later gained some notoriety by &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnziegler.com/editorials_details.asp?editorial=165&quot;&gt;slamming Wallace heartlessly&lt;/a&gt; after the author committed suicide, calling him an overrated writer and criticizing the press for its coverage of his death.  Now, Ziegler has once again made waves by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/interview-with-john-ziegler-on-zogby.html&quot;&gt;going nuclear in an interview&lt;/a&gt; with pollster-watcher Nate Silver over the legitimacy of a commissioned Zogby poll.  Silver questions the value of the poll, which contains leading questions, and which Ziegler plans on using in his &lt;a href=&quot;http://howobamagotelected.com/&quot;&gt;upcoming documentary&lt;/a&gt; to &quot;numerically prove&quot; that Obama supporters are grossly misinformed idiots. An excerpt from the end of the Nate Silver interview:

NS: Well, since you&#8217;re running a website calling people misinformed, I&#8217;d like to see if -- there are certain things you&#8217;ve said that I would consider misinformed.
JZ: Misinformed? You&apos;re a piece of work! You are never going to have the guts to post a representative transcript on your website! I thought you actually ran a legitimate website!

NS: Thank you, have a good day.
JZ: Go fuck yourself.

And here is an excerpt from the David Foster Wallace essay (Wallace sort of hammers Ziegler in the essay over Ziegler&apos;s obsession with OJ Simpson and his determined and frequent use of the n-word on the many radio shows he&apos;s been fired from):

The trouble starts when Tiger Woods wins the 1997 Masters. As part of his commentary on the tournament, Mr. Z. posits on-air that Tiger constitutes living proof of the fact that &quot;not all white people are racists.&quot; His supporting argument is that &quot;no white person would ever think of Tiger as a nigger,&quot; because whites draw a mental distinction &quot;between people who just happen to be black and people who act like niggers.&quot; His reason for broadcasting the actual word &quot;nigger&quot;? &quot;This all goes back to O.J. I hated the fact that the media treated viewers and listeners like children by saying &apos;Mark Fuhrman used the N-word.&apos; I despised that, and I think it gives the word too much power. Plus there&apos;s the whole hypocrisy of how black people can use it and white people can&apos;t. I was young and naive and thought I could stand on principle.&quot; As part of that principled stand, Mr. Z. soon redeploys the argument and the word in a discussion of boxer Mike Tyson, whereupon he is fired, &quot;even though there was very little listener reaction.&quot; As Mr. Z. understands it, the reason for his dismissal is that &quot;a single black employee complained,&quot; and WWTN&apos;s parent, &quot;a lily-white company,&quot; feared that it was &quot;very vulnerable&quot; to a discrimination lawsuit. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76687</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:54:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>538</category>
		<category>davidfosterwallace</category>
		<category>DFW</category>
		<category>fivethirtyeightcom</category>
		<category>John</category>
		<category>johnziegler</category>
		<category>Nate</category>
		<category>natesilver</category>
		<category>Silver</category>
		<category>Ziegler</category>
		<category>Zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>billysumday</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>That better be a Trekkie you&apos;re dating!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58210/That%2Dbetter%2Dbe%2Da%2DTrekkie%2Dyoure%2Ddating</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197001887&quot;&gt;According to a recent Zogby poll&lt;/a&gt;, parents would rather their daughter meet a date at a bar or a Star Trek convention than through online dating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58210</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dating</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>onlinedating</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<category>zogbypoll</category>
		<dc:creator>Afroblanco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s the Chronic - what? - Polls of Zobgy!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50144/Its%2Dthe%2DChronic%2Dwhat%2DPolls%2Dof%2DZobgy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6838"&gt;Nearly Half of Americans want to let states legally regulate and tax marijuana the way they do liquor and gambling.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zogby.com/&quot;&gt;Zogby International&lt;/a&gt; will pimp there services to just about anyone these days, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://norml.org/&quot;&gt;NORML&lt;/a&gt; for a poll on American&apos;s attitudes towards pot. According to the poll 65% of 18-29 year olds and 50% of 50-64 year-olds are cool with weed being legal and controlled like booze. The former slackers of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X&quot;&gt;Generation X&lt;/a&gt;, 30-49 year-olds, oppose it by 58% and the geezers over 65 oppose it by only 52%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

The pool shows some interesting generational attitudes. Is the 30-49 age group still following Nancy Reagan&apos;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_say_no&quot;&gt;Just Say No&lt;/a&gt;&quot; mantra or is this the attitude of parents worried about their kids? I thought these folks were supposed to be the slacker generation, and now they&apos;re the strongest opponents to legalization.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50144</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alice</category>
		<category>B.</category>
		<category>Bambalacha</category>
		<category>Blunt</category>
		<category>Brick</category>
		<category>Buda</category>
		<category>Cheeba</category>
		<category>Dawamesk</category>
		<category>Doobie</category>
		<category>Dusting</category>
		<category>Fatty</category>
		<category>Generation</category>
		<category>Grass</category>
		<category>Hemp</category>
		<category>Herb</category>
		<category>hit</category>
		<category>Jane</category>
		<category>Joint</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>Lid</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>Mary</category>
		<category>Matchbox</category>
		<category>NORML</category>
		<category>Phillies</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<category>Ragweed</category>
		<category>Reefer</category>
		<category>Roach</category>
		<category>shlook</category>
		<category>sticks</category>
		<category>Thai</category>
		<category>Toklas</category>
		<category>Wacky</category>
		<category>weed</category>
		<category>Woolah</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s Kerry&apos;s election to lose</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33027/Its%2DKerrys%2Delection%2Dto%2Dlose</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zogby.com/news/051004.html"&gt;Zogby calls the election for Kerry&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zogby.com/&quot;&gt;John Zogby&lt;/a&gt; goes out on a limb and predicts John Kerry will be the next POTUS.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33027</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 10:24:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>johnkerry</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>wsg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Raw data</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30010/Raw%2Ddata</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzcontentpage.html"&gt;Professor Pollkatz&apos;s statistics.&lt;/a&gt; Interestings graphics on Bush approval/disapproval. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/image001.gif&quot;&gt;This one&lt;/a&gt;, for example, clearly proves that whenever Bush&apos;s approval was high, it was driven by an event (the two major events being September 11 and the Iraq war) and steadily declined afterwards. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/bushindexprobushtable.htm&quot;&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; shows that FOX polls consistently overrate Bush, while Zogby polls consistently underrate him. &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30010</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>pollkatz</category>
		<category>ratings</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>Eloquence</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How the Poll Results on Iraq Were Manipulated</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29123/How%2Dthe%2DPoll%2DResults%2Don%2DIraq%2DWere%2DManipulated</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arabnews.com/services/print/print.asp?artid=33984&amp;d=22&amp;m=10&amp;y=2003&amp;hl=How%20the%20Poll%20Results%20on%20Iraq%20Were%20Manipulated&quot; title=&quot;Link via The Agonist with the following caveat, &apos;&apos;Usually, with this source I would say treat as suspect; however, the essay was written by Zogby himself, which begs the question - why hasn&apos;t the American mainstream media picked this up?&apos;&apos; &quot;&gt;How the Poll Results on Iraq Were Manipulated&lt;/a&gt; by James Zogby, Special to Arab News - &lt;em&gt; ...In fact, Zogby International in Iraq had conducted the poll, and the American Enterprise Institute  did publish their interpretation of the findings. But the AEI&#8217;s &quot;spin&quot; and the vice president&#8217;s use of their &quot;spin&quot; created a faulty impression of the poll&#8217;s results and, therefore, of the attitudes of the Iraqi people. Consider some of the other poll findings: Over 55 percent give a negative rating to &quot;how the US military is dealing with Iraqi civilians.&quot; Only 20 percent gave the US military a positive rating... &lt;strong&gt;When asked whom they preferred to &quot;provide security and restore order in their country,&quot; only 6.5 percent said the US&lt;/strong&gt;...&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29123</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:25:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11000/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/273/nation/Polls_say_blacks_tend_to_favor_cheeks+.shtml"&gt;Polls say&lt;/a&gt; blacks tend to favor checks.
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;African-Americans ... are more likely than other racial groups to favor profiling and stringent airport security checks for Arabs and Arab-Americans in the wake of this month&apos;s terrorist attacks, two separate polls indicate.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;
&quot;The findings by the Gallup Organization and Zogby International were
met with varying degrees of disappointment and disbelief by black activists and intellectuals, who struggled with explanations.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Could it be that income and education are more related to racialist attitudes than race itself?&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11000</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2001 00:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>black</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>check</category>
		<category>cheque</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>gallup</category>
		<category>income</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>sigsegv</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


