ardgedee's profile (website)
Info

Name: Art Delano
Joined: November 3, 2006
Contributions
MeFi: 101 posts , 5840 comments
MetaTalk:7 posts , 794 comments
Ask MeFi:13 questions , 471 answers
Music:0 posts , 8 comments , 0 playlists
Music Talk:0 posts , 1 comment
Projects:2 posts , 13 comments , 17 votes
Jobs:2 posts
IRL:6 posts , 100 comments
FanFare:18 posts , 83 comments
FanFare Talk:0 posts , 21 comments
View all activity
Favorites: 156
Favorited by others: 16080
★ I help fund MetaFilter!
MetaTalk:
Ask MeFi:
Music:
Music Talk:
Projects:
Jobs:
IRL:
FanFare:
FanFare Talk:
View all activity
Favorites: 156
Favorited by others: 16080
★ I help fund MetaFilter!
About
What's the deal with your nickname? How did you get it? If your nickname is self-explanatory, then tell everyone when you first started using the internet, and what was the first thing that made you say "wow, this isn't just a place for freaks after all?" Was it a website? Was it an email from a long-lost friend? Go on, spill it.
An easier way to quote other people in your comments: Metafilter Quoting Bookmarklet. [March 8, 2015: Updated for Modern Theme compatibility!]
The old Mac operating systems -- before OS X -- had many wonderful but little-used features. Among my favorites was the text-to-speech interpreter, complete with one or two dozen different voices ranging from silly to believable-over-a-bad-phoneline.
There aren't many good uses for a text-to-speech interpreter. In general we sighted lot are more comfortable with visible than audible feedback.
I was in a small circle of friends who began using text-to-speech voices to read ongoing chat sessions, so we could keep up with chatter and still get work done. There was a T-to-S compatible session client, and we played with settings and exchanged voice customization tips. The text-to-speech interpreter did a game job with all kinds of unusual words -- not usually right, but normally understandable in context -- and during slow moments we would feed it random words to see how they sounded.
And that's how my current nick was born: It's a speech-to-text transcription of an obsolete software's attempt to pronounce my intials as a word.
The current version of the Macintosh text-to-speech has improved enough to merit a bit part in Pixar's Wall-E. Despite its new fame, it's not as entertaining as the old System 8 version.
An easier way to quote other people in your comments: Metafilter Quoting Bookmarklet. [March 8, 2015: Updated for Modern Theme compatibility!]
The old Mac operating systems -- before OS X -- had many wonderful but little-used features. Among my favorites was the text-to-speech interpreter, complete with one or two dozen different voices ranging from silly to believable-over-a-bad-phoneline.
There aren't many good uses for a text-to-speech interpreter. In general we sighted lot are more comfortable with visible than audible feedback.
I was in a small circle of friends who began using text-to-speech voices to read ongoing chat sessions, so we could keep up with chatter and still get work done. There was a T-to-S compatible session client, and we played with settings and exchanged voice customization tips. The text-to-speech interpreter did a game job with all kinds of unusual words -- not usually right, but normally understandable in context -- and during slow moments we would feed it random words to see how they sounded.
And that's how my current nick was born: It's a speech-to-text transcription of an obsolete software's attempt to pronounce my intials as a word.
The current version of the Macintosh text-to-speech has improved enough to merit a bit part in Pixar's Wall-E. Despite its new fame, it's not as entertaining as the old System 8 version.