September 12, 2001
11:10 AM   Subscribe

Wondering why those in power are so earnestly characterizing an act of terrorism as an act of war? Because under New York Consolidated Law S3203.a.17.c.1.C, insurance companies don't have to pay for acts of war. (More inside.)
posted by Allen Varney (21 comments total)
 
Monday, August 6, 2001
New York State Consolidated Laws

ARTICLE 32
INSURANCE CONTRACTS - LIFE, ACCIDENT AND HEALTH, ANNUITIES

Section 3203. Individual life insurance policies; standard provisions as to contractual rights and responsibilities of policyholders and insurers.
S3203.a.17:
"(c) (1) A life insurance policy delivered or issued for delivery in this state may contain provisions excluding or restricting liability in the event of death as a result of:
"[...] (C) war or an act of war, within two years from the date of issue of the policy, if the cause of death occurs while the insured is outside the home area but is not serving in any armed forces or attached civilian unit, and death occurs outside the home area or within six
months after the insured`s return to the home area.
[...] (3) As used in this subsection, the term:
[...] (D) "war" includes any war declared or undeclared, and armed aggression resisted by any armed forces;
(E) "act of war" means any act peculiar to military, naval, or air operations in time of war...
posted by Allen Varney at 11:12 AM on September 12, 2001


Pretty much every insurance rider I've ever seen specifically excludes "acts of war". Which is one reason, I'm sure, the politicos have been saying all day that the federal government needs an "open-ended financial purse" (MSNBC quote) to pay for the aftermath. There'll be a bunch of paperwork, but everyone affected will be compensated.
posted by ewagoner at 11:20 AM on September 12, 2001


Note that the person must be outside their home area.

As in: "Hi, I'm a tourist that went to Kabul to take kewl pictures and got my ass blown to hell."
posted by linux at 11:21 AM on September 12, 2001


Sorry no link but I have read somewhere that insurers have already assured that everyone will be compensated. And if they backdown, no doubt there'll be huge public outrage whether it's some law or not.
posted by yupislyr at 11:23 AM on September 12, 2001


"Wondering why those in power are so earnestly characterizing an act of terrorism as an act of war?"

No. I wasn't wondering about that at all. It seemed pretty obvious to me. You sir, are loony.
posted by y6y6y6 at 11:29 AM on September 12, 2001


y6^3 beat me to the loony observation.

Good Lord some people believe in astonishingly silly things.
posted by marknau at 11:31 AM on September 12, 2001


Insurance companies love the odd disaster like this. It raises premiums.
posted by dydecker at 11:34 AM on September 12, 2001


You are the sickest fucking thread, goodbye.
posted by dagny at 11:38 AM on September 12, 2001


The scrolling text on CNN says an Insurance Industry spokesperson says that every ploicy will have it's benefits paid.
posted by stevis at 11:40 AM on September 12, 2001


In a similar vein, I was disappointed but not surprised to hear Rudy Giuliani warn the merchants of New York not to try to gouge consumers in the wake of the attacks...even in the face of huge adversity, some people will work for their own gain at the expense of others.
posted by briank at 11:43 AM on September 12, 2001


There are a lot of different types of insurance coverage and there are few blanket rules as to exclusions (regardless of what you believe New York insurance law to say). Generally, here's the possible types of benefits and the exclusions that may exist.

GROUP Term Life Insurance (offered through employer): NO EXCLUSIONS -- including suicide. Even if this is considered an act of war, all group term life benefits will be paid.

GROUP Accidental Death and Dismemberment (offered through employer): Depending on the policy, acts fo war or terrorism may not be covered. Most, however, (this is just in a cursory glance through a couple of the plans we've written recently) do cover acts of terrorism. Generally, AD&D provides for a second benefit equal to the life benefit -- AD&D is most always offered in conjunction with a group life plan.

GROUP Travel Accident Coverage (offered through employer): This will vary. Most GTA policies do NOT cover acts of war (and almost all do not cover for acts of war involving the US). GTA coverage is for people travelling on business.

Then, there are various other coverages (individual life, ad&d, travel, etc.) -- these vary so much that I wouldn't want to comment on the specifics.

I would be very surprised if this was considered an act of war by the many insurance companies that are involved in this tragedy.
posted by MarkAnd at 11:44 AM on September 12, 2001


More importantly, an "act of war" (pretty much) obligates NATO partners to go along with a response...
posted by sib at 11:54 AM on September 12, 2001


Well, the NATO folks have already passed a resolution to invoke Article 5 (ie: WAR) if the US says that's what it wants to do. So it looks like NATO is going along with the response the US wants to take.
posted by raintea at 12:08 PM on September 12, 2001


(C) "home area" means the fifty states of the United States, the District of Columbia, and Canada;


In other words, only if you're outside of the US and its environs will acts of war disqualify you from collecting your premiums.
posted by taumeson at 12:35 PM on September 12, 2001


send back your $300
posted by whoshotwho at 12:53 PM on September 12, 2001


can you declare war on a person or organization? or can it only be declared against a state?

is there a rule about this?
posted by mjane at 1:17 PM on September 12, 2001


It was noted by some talking head today that Thomas Jefferson declared war on the Barbary Pirates, who were not a "country" but a group of people. So, theoretically, assuming that the constitution hasn't changed in that light it can be done.
posted by elfgirl at 3:16 PM on September 12, 2001


Well, I've read my policies. Seems to me there's language about not covering acts of war *declared or undeclared*. Since my house is not apt to move out of the United States, I assume they mean right where it sits. Admittedly I have not read Morgan Stanley's insurance policies. For that matter I am sure that many of the businesses whose offices are no longer extant have insurance covering loss of business.

At least one insurance company had headquarters in those buildings. I wonder who a theoretical claimant would even call.

Of course it would be terrible terrible publicity for a major insurance company to fail to pay up. In the end that might be what gets the checks moving. Please keep in mind that worrying about insurance claims ranks on the "to do after terrorist attack levels building" list somewhere below the top ten.
posted by ilsa at 3:22 PM on September 12, 2001


yeah, dydecker, i'm sure the insurance companies are really loving this attack. they love paying out billions of dollars in damages.

and varney, "those in power" are characterizing this as an act of war so it's easier to convince people that we should bomb the hell out of someone/thing. that, and oh, the attack on multiple targets on our own soil, including military and civilian installations. what color is the sky in your world?
posted by mmanning at 4:35 PM on September 12, 2001


If this is classified as an act of terrorism - so insurance companies have to pay - and not an act of war - at which the government would pay - then it will actually be the end of many insurance companies. They will fold, many people will be out of jobs, worldwide.
posted by kv at 9:14 PM on September 12, 2001


and varney, "those in power" are characterizing this as an act of war so it's easier to convince people that we should bomb the hell out of someone/thing. that, and oh, the attack on multiple targets on our own soil, including military and civilian installations. what color is the sky in your world?
I live in the world where "war" is organized conflict between nation-states, or between rival factions struggling for control of their own nation-state. Or, in any case, it's not conflict between a world superpower and 50 guys with knives and box-cutters. Is my sky different from yours?
posted by Allen Varney at 10:48 PM on September 12, 2001


« Older Newspapers from around the world   |   Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments