History of Half-Mast
December 7, 2011 6:33 PM   Subscribe

"The earliest record we have of the lowering of a flag to signify a death was an occasion in 1612, when the Master of the 'Hearts Ease', William Hall, was murdered by Eskimos while taking part in an expedition in search of the North West Passage. On rejoining her consort, the vessel's flag was flown trailing over the stern as a mark of mourning. On her return to London, the 'Hearts Ease' again flew her flag over the stern and it was recognised as an appropriate gesture of mourning."

(quote continued; may be found in the second link at the second major indention)
"It was the habit, after the restoration of the Monarchy in 1660, for ships of the Royal Navy to fly their flags at half-mast on the anniversary of the execution of King Charles I on 30th January 1649, and it is from this custom that, so far as we can trace, the present practice of announcing a death by the flying of a flag at half-mast has evolved. The earlier practice at sea was to fly a black flag or to set a black sail.

We know that the hoisting of black sails was a sign of mourning from the very earliest times. The black sail was superseded by the black flag, probably because it was a nuisance to have to carry black sails for use only on rare occasions. It was probably the position, rather than the colour, that caught the attention, particularly at a distance."

There are several theories regarding the symbolism of a half-mast flag. The first and most prevalent interpretation is that it allows for the "invisible flag of death" to fly above it. This also lead to the practice that the flag should only be one flag-width down, instead of actually halfway down the staff. The second theory is that "untidiness and sloveliness of appearence were supposed to be the signs of grief." The third theory is that it is a salute to the departed (also in the previous link).

When a flag cannot be lowered to half-mast (such as a fixed flag or the flags of a military unit) they can be marked with a black streamer. Some countries (like Japan for example) choose to use either a black ribbon or the half-mast depending upon the situation. Saudi Arabia is one of the few countries that does not lower their flag to half-mast as it contains holy writing on it and it would be considered blasphemous.

Protocol for raising a flag to half-mast requires that it is raised to the finial quickly and then slowly lowered to the position of half-mast. Some countries (like the US) fly their flags halfway down the staff while others (like the UK) fly it two-thirds between the bottom and top of the staff. The reason for two-thirds is for the invisible flag of death. Lowering a half-mast flag is done by doing the reverse so that it is raised back to the finial quickly and then slowly lowered the entire way.

The flag is generally flown at half-mast from sunrise to sunset on the specified days, except on the US Memorial Day when it is flown half-mast until noon when it is raised to full-mast. The reason for this is that the first half of the day remembers the war dead while the second half honors those still alive. When Congress approved this they issued the proclamation, "For the nation lives, and the flag is a symbol of illumination."

Previously on flags.
posted by Deflagro (11 comments total) 9 users marked this as a favorite
So, was there enough time from that question on Jeopardy this evening to this post to lead us to believe there is a connection?
posted by tomswift at 6:34 PM on December 7, 2011

I actually don't have a tv in my dorm so I wasn't able to watch chicobangs on Jeopardy. This was post was inspired by seeing all the flags for Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.

What was the Jeopardy question?
posted by Deflagro at 6:39 PM on December 7, 2011

It was a pretty simple question based on a category with "half" in the title, something about naval ships and mourning. The answer was "what is half-staff"
posted by tomswift at 7:00 PM on December 7, 2011

Q: He was the younger brother of Falstaff.
posted by Joe in Australia at 7:33 PM on December 7, 2011

I think the man in question was actually James Hall, rather than William, and that the Inuit killed him because he had (on a previous expedition to Greenland) been party to the kidnapping of some of their countrymen. Calling it "murder" is thus rather unfair, as he was part of a known group of kidnappers and they had good reason to attack him.
posted by 1adam12 at 7:41 PM on December 7, 2011

Factual correctness aside, that appears to be a direct quote; it wasn't Deflagro using the word "murder," but the Board of Admiralty's archivist, apparently.
posted by Kadin2048 at 7:47 PM on December 7, 2011 [1 favorite]

I believe even in our times a revenge killing for kidnapping (or even murder-kidnapping) would be murder. Perhaps the type subject to jury nullification, but nevertheless.

I do find it fascinating that Buckingham Palace, presumably on the death of George VI, wanted to know the history of the practice.
posted by dhartung at 10:20 PM on December 7, 2011 [1 favorite]

I guess "Eskimo" is still a socially acceptable term in some places, eh? Interesting.
posted by asnider at 10:50 PM on December 7, 2011

I guess "Eskimo" is still a socially acceptable term in some places, eh? Interesting.

Yes, yes, it is.
posted by rodgerd at 2:05 AM on December 8, 2011

Yes, yes, it is.

posted by asnider at 7:07 AM on December 8, 2011

Rhode Island is (I think) the only state still celebrating V-J Day. And the Governor also ordered all state-office flags flown at half mast yesterday (7-DEC-11) in honor of the anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
posted by wenestvedt at 10:01 AM on December 8, 2011

« Older Beyond Good and Evil   |   Leisure Suit Larry Newer »

This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments