"Negotiation, strategy, cooperation."
September 2, 2018 7:04 PM   Subscribe

 
This is so cool. Thanks for sharing. I loved the scene, not knowing anything about mahjong, and this helps me understand it even more.
posted by rogerrogerwhatsyourrvectorvicto at 7:18 PM on September 2, 2018


Oh thank god. After that scene finished I knew i needed someone to explain of to me.
posted by GuyZero at 7:59 PM on September 2, 2018 [2 favorites]


Note: the URL renders the content for mobile devices. This is the non-mobile version, FWIW.
posted by filthy light thief at 9:17 PM on September 2, 2018


I play mah jongg and, except for the extra tiles in Singapore style, this is the game I play. It's a great game but it takes a really long time to play a complete game (East has to shift to each seat, and only shifts if East loses a hand). And there was only mention of points, not of money. All my sets have comes with a bunch of ivory or plastic sticks with incised dots of black or red, indicating monetary value. The last group I played with sort of fell apart a year or so ago because of job changes, shift changes, family stuff, etc. Each person's money is in a plastic bag with their name, waiting for the game to start again. I'd really like to see this film.
posted by MovableBookLady at 10:05 PM on September 2, 2018 [1 favorite]


I started learning Mahjong, but haven't seen the movie yet. I was asked by multiple friends who have seen the movie but didn't know Mahjong if the "W M tile" was the most powerful tile in the game. To which I just said "No, that's just an 8". I figured some kind of writeup was in the works, because I couldn't grasp how a whole movie hinged on a random number in the set. It had to be about context (of which I had none).
posted by Metro Gnome at 10:26 PM on September 2, 2018


I'm very much a a newbie with mahjong. I guess the pair of red dragons in her hand is her pairing with her fiancé, that seems blatant?
posted by fleacircus at 1:39 AM on September 3, 2018


As mentioned in the FPP, the number 8 has major significance in Chinese numerology. 88 resembles the ideogram for "double joy", which, not incidentally, is also a symbol for marriage.
posted by fraula at 2:01 AM on September 3, 2018 [2 favorites]


Excellent. Watched with my kids so nice to have the breakdown of a game we are learning.
posted by tilde at 2:56 AM on September 3, 2018


I played a lot of mahjong when I first got a computer, and until bow I never suspected the depth of the game. Far from just a matching game, it sounds like rummy on top of bridge!
posted by wenestvedt at 3:20 AM on September 3, 2018


This article was republished in Vox. There's also a different article in Vulture on the same theme, with some different points. I particularly liked the insights into how the scene was filmed and things that changed, like originally having the two other players be comic relief.
posted by Nelson at 6:55 AM on September 3, 2018


Here's a more detailed article written by Lim Yi Sheng, a Singaporean. It expounds on the Jeff Yang piece.
posted by aielen at 8:29 AM on September 3, 2018 [5 favorites]


Wenestvedt: yeah, it's really sad that that matching game is called mah-jongg as it has nothing to do with the real game except the tile figures. There used to be a computer game of real Mah-Jongg made by Steve Jackson Games for the Mac but it got out-dated and was never fixed; I wrote Steve jackson and he confirmed they weren't going to do anything. I've been annoyed ever since.
posted by MovableBookLady at 8:41 AM on September 3, 2018 [4 favorites]


Don't skip over the link posted by aielen, it is amazing (i'm actually getting weepy again, like I did while watching the scene.)
posted by vespabelle at 9:44 AM on September 3, 2018


it sounds like rummy on top of bridge!

(cw, I'm a prating newbie).

It's solidly a rummy game. I really like it. It'd be sorta like gin played with four decks of cards. There's no cross-suit stuff; a set is three copies of the same card. Face cards aren't part of runs and aren't considered for suit either and they're dragons and winds now don't @ them. Players strive to form a winning fourteen-card hand, generally with four three-card melds and a pair: 3-3-3-3-2. You lay it down and win. There's one winner and they get points/money based purely on their hand; you generally don't see the losing hands. Also, you can only take a discard to complete a meld, which you reveal.

To cut to it, the huge wrinkle that elevates mahjong to OMG level is that not just any old hand can go out. You either need a specific "theme hand" (not an official term) that has some aspect of symmetry or completeness — some of them even break the 3-3-3-3-2 format, like seven pairs, or thirteen orphans — or you need some hard/lucky bonus aspect of the game, such as never taking a discard. Or, merely having a set of dragons.

I like getting a pair of dragons early. When you are trying to make a set from a pair you can grab the discard from any player. And when you have a set of dragons, the rest of your hand can be just a bunch of non-thematic sets and runs. Dragons + Garbage is a winning hand! You won't get a lot of points that way, but you can get a faster win. As a bad player, I am highly interested in easy low scoring wins. So when I have two dragons it's kind of a relief; that option is probably open.

So to me that's another symbolic aspect to Rachel's hand. Rachel has two dragons, but she isn't even using them. They're not a set. The third dragon would most blatantly represent Eleanor and her approval, which Rachel doesn't have. She doesn't need it, though, because she is not going for a dragons + garbage win. Even if what she has is legit and would beat Eleanor even with all that poor north wind and bamboo, Rachel doesn't consider it a winning hand, either.
posted by fleacircus at 8:40 PM on September 3, 2018 [5 favorites]


« Older the most intense reactions so far have been books...   |   Av average of ten “solid bulk cargo” carriers are... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments