Flight Qualified by NASA for all manned space missions
March 1, 2019 8:35 AM   Subscribe

Today, mechanical wrist watches are often considered expensive, superfluous jewelry, but they're also magnificent miniature mechanical machines, and many of today's watches have important provenance in Aviation, Auto Racing, Diving and Space Exploration. Perhaps the most important mechanical watch in the history of Space Exploration is the Omega Speedmaster professional.

The Speedmaster was originally designed as a chronograph for motorsports, hence it has an external Tachymeter bezel.

It wasn't, however, the first watch worn in space. That honor goes to Yuri Gagarin's Vostok 1 flight on April 12, 1961 - Gagarin wore a manual wind Sturmanskie and ignited the space race

The Speedmaster was selected by NASA in 1964, mainly by a single engineer - Jim Ragan.


The Speedmaster was also not the first watch worn by an American in space, that was a 24 Hour Breitling Navitimer worn by Scott Carpenter during Mercury 7, on May 24, 1962

The astronauts personal Speedmasters were worn by Wally Schirra and Gordon Cooper before NASA started issuing the Speedmaster before Gemini 3. Gemini 4 saw the Speedmaster's first use during EVA

This history of this watch and its role in the space program is more than that of just an artifact. Astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee died in the tragic fire abord Apollo 1, while conducting a ground test at Cape Kennedy.

Apollo 1 dented our pledge to go to the moon. Apollo 8 was brought forward with the audacious goal of orbiting the moon sooner than originally planned. The astronauts wore Speedmasters when they first disappeared behind the moon and Jim Lovell said "We'll see you on the other side". This was a critical moment. While behind the moon, Apollo 8 had to fire its engine to achieve LOI, Lunar Orbit Insertion.

A Speedmaster was the first watch worn on the moon, during Apollo 11. It wasn't on the arm of Neil Armstrong, though, it was worn by Buzz Aldrin. Neil's watch was left behind in the Lunar Module as a backup to the broken mission timer

During the ill-fated Apollo 13, the crew used their Speedmasters to time critical course correction burns necessary to return home to earth. For this, Omega was given a Silver Snoopy Award

Omega is, likely, the only continous contractor to NASA still in operation. Speedmasters are still worn by astronauts on the Space station today.

Most mechanical watches sold today are Veblen Goods and priced far above their cost and probable utility.

Oh yeah, there's a new documentary about Apollo 11 being released, previously.

A last article on the story of the Omega Speedmaster and NASA

posted by codewheeney (8 comments total) 23 users marked this as a favorite
 
This is excellent, thank you. I only knew a tiny bit about the Speedmaster's history, but it's on the (very) short list of watches I desire to own (the others are the Longines Legend Diver and a Junghans Max Bill, the latter being the only one I think I'll ever possess).

Watches are such fascinating instruments.
posted by Fish Sauce at 9:21 AM on March 1, 2019 [2 favorites]


Man, I saw the content above the fold and thought "Oh, I know some trivia that I can add as a useful comment, and I'll be in time near the top of the thread!" and... it's all there, and then some. Wow, great post!
posted by dbx at 10:03 AM on March 1, 2019 [2 favorites]


And for anyone who would like to own a NASA flight-qualified watch but doesn't have $4,000 to spend, the Casio G-Shock DW-5600E is available for $40.

It wasn't worn on the moon, but it was worn on several shuttle and ISS missions. It beeps on the hour, too—take that, Speedy!
posted by vitout at 10:34 AM on March 1, 2019 [2 favorites]


I'll never own one (I'm not into the multiple dials, even if I wanted to spend that much) but there's no denying that it is a really good looking watch.
posted by Dip Flash at 12:03 PM on March 1, 2019


"Yeah, I mean, you wouldn't want to be walking around like a dickhead with the wrong date on your Omicron Spymaster."

The Speedmaster is a beautiful watch, but what's with most nice automatic watches being ginormous? I would have presupposed that miniaturizing mechanical watches (even further) to be a criteria of quality/ desirability.
posted by porpoise at 1:01 PM on March 1, 2019


Chronographs -- that is, watches like this that have a stopwatch feature -- tend to be bigger to accommodate the sub-dials. Diver-style watches have traditionally been oversized for better visibility.

Other than that, though, for decades, men's high-end watches were all a pretty consistent size -- the 70s era Rolex I inherited from my dad is the same size as a current model, or one from the 50s or 60s or 80s or 90s: all 36mm watches.

Unfortunately, in the last 10 years or so there's been a push for needlessly-bigger watches, which I absolutely parse as a sort of look-at-me tacky impulse. 40mm+ for a no-complication analog is absurdly gross to me. These look ridiculous on most people, so of course they're very popular. Even Rolex got into the game, with the DateJust 41 (ie, a 41mm model). Some of their newer models are big, too, like the otherwise really cool Milgauss (40mm).

However, most of the nicer lines still make their classic models. They just end up being kind of overshadowed by the more visually noisy monster watches.

Anyway: for years, I was a mechanical watch collector -- probably inspired by dad's watch. I bought here and there where I could afford it, mostly watch-nerd pieces that weren't that expensive, but I did go in for a "Bond" era Omega Seamaster (like this one) around the time Goldeneye came out. (Hey, it was the dot-com era; booms have SOME privileges. I will note for the record, though, that high-end jewelers do not think you are very funny if you ask "hey, how you make that laser shoot out?" in your best Mississippi accent.)

All that kinda ground to a halt about 3 years ago when I bought an Apple Watch for running, and found myself wearing it every day -- it's just too dang useful. As a consequence, I no longer think about what nicer pieces I might add to my modest collection, and have given up on the idea that I'll ever own an IWC, or a Reverso, etc.

But someday I absolutely WILL buy a Speedmaster. They're just too cool.
posted by uberchet at 2:08 PM on March 1, 2019 [2 favorites]


I'll dive into the rest this weekend, but to your point at the end, the Apollo 11 documentary is out in IMAX right now for one week prior to a wider release on the 8th. Get your tickets!
posted by hankscorpio83 at 4:42 PM on March 1, 2019 [1 favorite]


Saw the Apollo 11 documentary today. Holy. Cow. Wonderful, epic, emotional, super well done. If you're at all even a passing space nerd, I recommend you check it out. Especially if you can see it in IMAX. I'm going to see it again while it's still in IMAX, for sure.
posted by codewheeney at 6:33 PM on March 3, 2019


« Older The real mystery is that they had no...   |   At the very least, gradients offer an opportunity... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments