July 14, 2002 9:42 AM   Subscribe

This LA Times article goes into some of the details of the Bush/Harken SEC investigation. While it leaves a lot of questions unanswered, it's largely exculpatory.
posted by electro (1 comment total)
So the bottom line for the SEC was that Harken stock didn't collapse; and the bottom line for us, generally, is that there was an unidentified buyer and the broker witness tried other large shareholders before Bush, who then took a couple of weeks to get back to him. That doesn't rule out collusion, but if there was any it was well buried in advance.
posted by dhartung at 9:49 AM on July 14, 2002

« Older Can't seem to finish your thesis?   |   Do you, Adam, take this man Steve, to be your... Newer »

This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments