X-Ray
March 28, 2003 12:56 PM Subscribe
Resembles my ex-wife in divorce court.
posted by bluedaniel at 1:09 PM on March 28, 2003
posted by bluedaniel at 1:09 PM on March 28, 2003
Don't we want to save that imagery until Schwartzenneggar runs for the Senate?
posted by wendell at 1:56 PM on March 28, 2003
posted by wendell at 1:56 PM on March 28, 2003
Recall, recall, recall!
I'd buy that for a dollar!
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 1:58 PM on March 28, 2003
I'd buy that for a dollar!
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 1:58 PM on March 28, 2003
didn't see that one coming.
posted by angry modem at 2:23 PM on March 28, 2003
posted by angry modem at 2:23 PM on March 28, 2003
nsfw
Ah, Veronica Zemanova. A lady I learned about after someone posted an off-topic post regarding her in a newsgroup. I asked who it was and as a reply I received a gigantic mailbomb of her pictures. The person seemed to think he was being genuinely helpful.
Looking at that one and looking at the GWB one shows just how well done the Bush "x-ray" is.
posted by bargle at 2:44 PM on March 28, 2003
Ah, Veronica Zemanova. A lady I learned about after someone posted an off-topic post regarding her in a newsgroup. I asked who it was and as a reply I received a gigantic mailbomb of her pictures. The person seemed to think he was being genuinely helpful.
Looking at that one and looking at the GWB one shows just how well done the Bush "x-ray" is.
posted by bargle at 2:44 PM on March 28, 2003
Who is this Veronica Zemanova anyhow?
I remember reading about this technique in a flash tutorial site... I agree that the Veronica one is rather sloppy... especially if you move it all the way down to the bottom of her legs.
posted by FiveFrozenFish at 3:30 PM on March 28, 2003
I remember reading about this technique in a flash tutorial site... I agree that the Veronica one is rather sloppy... especially if you move it all the way down to the bottom of her legs.
posted by FiveFrozenFish at 3:30 PM on March 28, 2003
When will Veronica Zemanova be anchoring a network news show?
posted by pejamo at 3:52 PM on March 28, 2003
posted by pejamo at 3:52 PM on March 28, 2003
danOstuporStar: please. that required a better warning than nsfw. maybe nsfw, straight women, and gay men.
posted by benjh at 5:01 PM on March 28, 2003
posted by benjh at 5:01 PM on March 28, 2003
What yer got next for me?... a really cool pic of Bill Gates looking like one of those Borg things?
Errf.
posted by ed\26h at 5:46 PM on March 28, 2003
Errf.
posted by ed\26h at 5:46 PM on March 28, 2003
Who is this Veronica Zemanova anyhow?
A nude model.
*does a google search*
Not Safe For Work...a bio page, but it has nudity too. Now we all know too much about some naked model.
I remember reading about this technique in a flash tutorial site... I agree that the Veronica one is rather sloppy... especially if you move it all the way down to the bottom of her legs.
The Bush one was impressive because if you moved down his side, the real Bush and the cyborg Bush matched up. There is that little place where his clothes kinda stuck out and then in that same spot there was an extrusion on cyborg Bush. OTOH, the nekkid girl wasn't even in the same place or position as the clothed girl, it just didn't line up.
posted by bargle at 6:32 PM on March 28, 2003
A nude model.
*does a google search*
Not Safe For Work...a bio page, but it has nudity too. Now we all know too much about some naked model.
I remember reading about this technique in a flash tutorial site... I agree that the Veronica one is rather sloppy... especially if you move it all the way down to the bottom of her legs.
The Bush one was impressive because if you moved down his side, the real Bush and the cyborg Bush matched up. There is that little place where his clothes kinda stuck out and then in that same spot there was an extrusion on cyborg Bush. OTOH, the nekkid girl wasn't even in the same place or position as the clothed girl, it just didn't line up.
posted by bargle at 6:32 PM on March 28, 2003
sorry for the previous derail... great link homunculus. i've forwarded it on to my pro-bush-kill-em-all-anti-france-o'reilly-loving 'buddies'. just knowing they'll cringe in disgust is satisfaction enough. thanks again:)
posted by poopy at 6:40 PM on March 28, 2003
posted by poopy at 6:40 PM on March 28, 2003
Ahahaha! Holy shit, the quality really makes that one. One of the most hilarious things* I've seen in a while. Thanks man.
*and I don't even really have all that much animosity for Dubya
posted by kavasa at 12:11 AM on March 29, 2003
*and I don't even really have all that much animosity for Dubya
posted by kavasa at 12:11 AM on March 29, 2003
Nah. Bush isn't evil. For the president, as for many evangelicals, feeling trumps thinking when it comes to deciding the right thing to do.
I'm reminded of a bit from a short story by Douglas Adams about an escaped Designer Person:
" 'The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation were awarded a huge research grant to design and produce synthetic personalities to order. The results were uniformly disastrous. All the "people" and "personalities" turned out to be amalgams of characteristics which simply could not co-exist in naturally occurring life forms. Most of them were just poor pathetic misfits, but some were deeply, deeply dangerous. Dangerous because they didn't ring alarm bells in other people. They could walk through situations the way that ghosts walk through walls, because no one spotted the danger.
The most dangerous of all were three identical ones - they were put in this hold, to be blasted, with this ship, right out of this universe.
They are not evil, in fact they are rather simple and charming. But they are the most dangerous creatures that ever lived because there is nothing they will not do if allowed, and nothing they will not be allowed to do...' "
posted by eustacescrubb at 11:04 AM on March 29, 2003
I'm reminded of a bit from a short story by Douglas Adams about an escaped Designer Person:
" 'The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation were awarded a huge research grant to design and produce synthetic personalities to order. The results were uniformly disastrous. All the "people" and "personalities" turned out to be amalgams of characteristics which simply could not co-exist in naturally occurring life forms. Most of them were just poor pathetic misfits, but some were deeply, deeply dangerous. Dangerous because they didn't ring alarm bells in other people. They could walk through situations the way that ghosts walk through walls, because no one spotted the danger.
The most dangerous of all were three identical ones - they were put in this hold, to be blasted, with this ship, right out of this universe.
They are not evil, in fact they are rather simple and charming. But they are the most dangerous creatures that ever lived because there is nothing they will not do if allowed, and nothing they will not be allowed to do...' "
posted by eustacescrubb at 11:04 AM on March 29, 2003
Now we all know too much about some naked model.
You can never know too much about naked models.
posted by jonmc at 11:44 AM on March 29, 2003
You can never know too much about naked models.
posted by jonmc at 11:44 AM on March 29, 2003
"He's got the boots and the twang, but Bush is no cowboy when it comes to foreign policy. Instead, he's the Terminator, a cyborg lumbering through a very long revenge movie."
posted by homunculus at 1:02 PM on April 10, 2003
posted by homunculus at 1:02 PM on April 10, 2003
« Older What is Google.ac? | surreality: the art of Naoto Hattori Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by muckster at 1:08 PM on March 28, 2003