Yay, more photography! I like some of these. Overall, though, they seem more like decent holiday snaps than anything else. The exposures aren't always quite right (which isn't bad if the end result works, but most of these just end up looking incorrectly exposed to me), he'd get much better saturation using slower film (many of those pictures would work much better with better saturation - or, since some of them are shot on transparency film (which should give better saturation), perhaps his scans aren't very good, which isn't really an excuse), and quite often his composition is bland (to me). I do like more than a couple, but most of them don't really leap out at me, I'm afraid, I think that perhaps he needs to be a harsher editor (but the more photography links, the better! Thanks for this one). posted by biscotti at 8:09 AM on April 20, 2003
This is good, thanks hama7. posted by plep at 8:14 AM on April 20, 2003
« Older The Flight of Ducks | Evidence? We don't need no steenkin' evidence Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by biscotti at 8:09 AM on April 20, 2003