“If You Harbor Terrorists, You Are a Terrorist”
September 22, 2004 4:33 AM Subscribe
“If You Harbor Terrorists, You Are a Terrorist” While delegates to the GOP convention were congratulating themselves for their candidate’s tough stand against terrorism, the Bush administration was creating an international incident—little publicized in the United States—by harboring a notorious group of international terrorists on U.S. soil.
What a disgusting racket.
What chance the Republican candidate for president will comment on his actions in securing these criminals their liberty, false passports and international travel - when even his spokesman hasn't held more than two briefings in the last two months?
posted by dash_slot- at 5:16 AM on September 22, 2004
What chance the Republican candidate for president will comment on his actions in securing these criminals their liberty, false passports and international travel - when even his spokesman hasn't held more than two briefings in the last two months?
posted by dash_slot- at 5:16 AM on September 22, 2004
the US doesn't like Castro so that is different, right? no it doesn't make sense to me either
posted by dabitch at 5:26 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by dabitch at 5:26 AM on September 22, 2004
I've read that the Cuban vote is no longer reliably repub due to the new travel restrictions, so maybe this was an attempt to win them back, or show that they still care?
posted by amberglow at 5:29 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by amberglow at 5:29 AM on September 22, 2004
See Metafilter 35559, Terrorists Arrive in Miami!
the Bush family have a history of aiding, abetting, and associating with known terrorists. (more on this, and more and more - "George W. Bush named Otto Reich as his assistant secretary of state for Western hemisphere affairs--despite Reich’s longstanding ties to anti-Castro terrorist Orlando Bosch")
Here is a Orlando Bosch’s terrorist curriculum vitae
- one of the most extensive terrorist resumes in the 20th Century. Something on the order of 100 separate terrorist bombings, and murders have been attributed to Bosch - including planting the bomb that blew up a Cuban airliner in 1976.
By George W. Bush's definition of terrorism, there are, in fact, terrorists within his own family !
So - by his own logic, George W. Bush is a terrorist and so is duty-bound to declare war on himself.
posted by troutfishing at 5:35 AM on September 22, 2004
the Bush family have a history of aiding, abetting, and associating with known terrorists. (more on this, and more and more - "George W. Bush named Otto Reich as his assistant secretary of state for Western hemisphere affairs--despite Reich’s longstanding ties to anti-Castro terrorist Orlando Bosch")
Here is a Orlando Bosch’s terrorist curriculum vitae
- one of the most extensive terrorist resumes in the 20th Century. Something on the order of 100 separate terrorist bombings, and murders have been attributed to Bosch - including planting the bomb that blew up a Cuban airliner in 1976.
By George W. Bush's definition of terrorism, there are, in fact, terrorists within his own family !
So - by his own logic, George W. Bush is a terrorist and so is duty-bound to declare war on himself.
posted by troutfishing at 5:35 AM on September 22, 2004
"For too long our culture has said, "If it feels good, do it." Now America is embracing a new ethic and a new creed: "Let's roll." - George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, January 29, 2002. Spoken like a true terrorist leader.
We're now rolling alright - like a schoolbus full of children that's gone off a twisty mountain road and over the edge of a cliff.
posted by troutfishing at 6:23 AM on September 22, 2004
We're now rolling alright - like a schoolbus full of children that's gone off a twisty mountain road and over the edge of a cliff.
posted by troutfishing at 6:23 AM on September 22, 2004
Americans have a bunch of criminally minded clowns for government and the great American people are going to elect them properly this time. The rest of the world is convinced about that. How do you think Americans all over the world will be treated from now on?
posted by acrobat at 6:24 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by acrobat at 6:24 AM on September 22, 2004
Another eminently logical conclusion :
If George W. Bush wins in November, the US will quickly be crawling with terrorists.
_____________________
"The Intelligence Community is guided by the definition of terrorism contained in Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f(d):
—The term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.
—The term “international terrorism” means terrorism involving the territory or the citizens of more than one country.
—The term “terrorist group” means any group that practices, or has significant subgroups that practice, international terrorism." (from the US CIA's "Terrorism FAQ's")
posted by troutfishing at 6:26 AM on September 22, 2004
If George W. Bush wins in November, the US will quickly be crawling with terrorists.
_____________________
"The Intelligence Community is guided by the definition of terrorism contained in Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f(d):
—The term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.
—The term “international terrorism” means terrorism involving the territory or the citizens of more than one country.
—The term “terrorist group” means any group that practices, or has significant subgroups that practice, international terrorism." (from the US CIA's "Terrorism FAQ's")
posted by troutfishing at 6:26 AM on September 22, 2004
Remember, "terrorist" is the word used when we don't agree with their politics or rationale. If we do agree, we get "freedom fighter", "patriot", "operative", etc.
posted by FormlessOne at 7:12 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by FormlessOne at 7:12 AM on September 22, 2004
I salute anyone who wants to kill Fidel.
posted by ParisParamus at 10:01 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by ParisParamus at 10:01 AM on September 22, 2004
PP: A terrorist is one who causes terror. It doesn't count if you morally appreciate or agree with the sort of terror the person creates.
Stick to generally objective definitions of words, rather than definitions that best fit your ideology, and you'll find yourself taken more seriously.
If that matters to you.
posted by xmutex at 10:10 AM on September 22, 2004
Stick to generally objective definitions of words, rather than definitions that best fit your ideology, and you'll find yourself taken more seriously.
If that matters to you.
posted by xmutex at 10:10 AM on September 22, 2004
You people are so ridiculous and
Who needs logic when there are whole seas of non-sequiturs sloshing around in some brains ?
posted by troutfishing at 10:18 AM on September 22, 2004
Who needs logic when there are whole seas of non-sequiturs sloshing around in some brains ?
posted by troutfishing at 10:18 AM on September 22, 2004
Neat trick, troutfishing.
I think Bush is talking about anyone ELSE who harbors terrorists is a terrorist. Come on now, people! He's the president, don't you all know that he's above the law? He IS the law!
Then again, if people get together and bounce his stupid ass out then maybe he'll find out just how beneath the law he really is. I'd love to see him get charged with war crimes.
And I loved Bush speaking to the UN yesterday. He acted like he was good friends with Kofi Annan when Kofi just wanted to walk away from him.
posted by fenriq at 10:34 AM on September 22, 2004
I think Bush is talking about anyone ELSE who harbors terrorists is a terrorist. Come on now, people! He's the president, don't you all know that he's above the law? He IS the law!
Then again, if people get together and bounce his stupid ass out then maybe he'll find out just how beneath the law he really is. I'd love to see him get charged with war crimes.
And I loved Bush speaking to the UN yesterday. He acted like he was good friends with Kofi Annan when Kofi just wanted to walk away from him.
posted by fenriq at 10:34 AM on September 22, 2004
The quoted USDOD definition of "terrorism" is broad enough to cover the U.S. bombing of Baghdad. Remember "shock and awe"?
posted by Mars Saxman at 10:44 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by Mars Saxman at 10:44 AM on September 22, 2004
Witty: do you not have any logical argument to make? If not, then even, perhaps especially, if you make a pathetic comment like that, your debating opponent wins. It's like throwing in the towel, but sneering as you walk back to the dressing room - 'coulda bin a contender...'
posted by dash_slot- at 10:49 AM on September 22, 2004
posted by dash_slot- at 10:49 AM on September 22, 2004
if you make a pathetic comment like that, your debating opponent wins.
Hmm, I had no idea this was a contest. A winner and loser? And here I thought it was the 'best of the web'.
posted by Dennis Murphy at 11:36 AM on September 22, 2004
Hmm, I had no idea this was a contest. A winner and loser? And here I thought it was the 'best of the web'.
posted by Dennis Murphy at 11:36 AM on September 22, 2004
Do you not have any logical argument to make?
Nope. What's to argue about? You people are indeed ridiculous and laughable. But thanks for asking.
posted by Witty at 12:07 PM on September 22, 2004
Nope. What's to argue about? You people are indeed ridiculous and laughable. But thanks for asking.
posted by Witty at 12:07 PM on September 22, 2004
George Bush will tolerate no terrorists (that are not Cuban). Nor will he endure anyone or any company that aids terrorists or Axis of Evil(tm) countries (that are not Saudi or formerly on the Halliburton board).
posted by clevershark at 12:49 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by clevershark at 12:49 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by SpaceCadet at 4:21 PM on September 22, 2004
one can always rely on witty where it concerns ridiculous and laughable.
posted by quonsar at 5:12 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by quonsar at 5:12 PM on September 22, 2004
Hmm, I had no idea this was a contest. A winner and loser? And here I thought it was the 'best of the web'.
There should be a ratio posted on eac member's profile page with the number of times he or she invokes "best of the web" divided by the number of posts he or she makes worthy of tat label.
We could call it the Seth quotient.
posted by Space Coyote at 5:48 PM on September 22, 2004
There should be a ratio posted on eac member's profile page with the number of times he or she invokes "best of the web" divided by the number of posts he or she makes worthy of tat label.
We could call it the Seth quotient.
posted by Space Coyote at 5:48 PM on September 22, 2004
If we keep at it, this could come to be known as the infamous "marquee" thread ! But, remember that some commentary is equally hideous or may even go beyond mere marquee kitsch...just saying, yo. Crapping on logical arguments via non sequitur is beyond marque, IMHO - so why not up the ante ? I'd rather draw call out intentionally obtuse blather with equally obtuse html tricks. Why not ?.....So, without further ado, here's a January 29, 2002 State of The Union address from George W. Bush :
posted by troutfishing at 8:13 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by troutfishing at 8:13 PM on September 22, 2004
This is sort of like the film lead-in to "The Matrix" rotated 90%
posted by troutfishing at 8:16 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by troutfishing at 8:16 PM on September 22, 2004
90 Degrees, that is. Oops, wrong pill.
posted by troutfishing at 8:17 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by troutfishing at 8:17 PM on September 22, 2004
THIS! THIS is why JRun is so angry at all of you.
posted by Krrrlson at 9:34 PM on September 22, 2004
posted by Krrrlson at 9:34 PM on September 22, 2004
Krrrlson - Stare at those huge blocks of text as they scroll by : strange, random associations - artifacts of the stacked text - pop out.
I think it's groovy.
But to get back to the main point of the thread :
GEORGE W. BUSH'S LOGIC
By his own logic - from his proven associations with known terrorists, George W. Bush is duty bound to arrest himself and - indeed - much of his family as well (the twins are probably innocent, but Laura...who knows?).
1) : Those who associate with terrorists are like terrorists themselves (proposition advanced by George W. Bush in various speeches.)
2) : George W. Bush has associated with - and/or his administration has consciously allowed into the United States - known terrorists.
3) : George W. Bush, by his own logic, is thus like a terrorist and so is bound, by his vows to the United States and to the American People, to discharge the duties and obligations he has been entrusted with as President......
To arrest himself and to prosecute himself to the harshest extent of the law.
He probably should strip himself of all legal rights and place himself in Guantanamo, under protective surveillance, to make sure he doesn't repeat the offense - of associating with and enabling known terrorists and so endangering the American people. He probably should also torture himself a bit, to see what he knows, because his publicly known associations could be just the tip of the iceberg.
As he himself noted, anyone who would associate with terrorists who make it their business to blow up innocent men, women, and children is morally suspect, and so the need to protect the American people would supercede his individual rights.
This is really quite urgent : he has associated with known terrorists and also has access to nuclear devices. Mr. Bush needs to send a DELTA FORCE team in to bust his ass, pronto - we're all at risk.
"....tens of thousands of trained terrorists are still at large. These enemies view the entire world as a battlefield, and we must pursue them wherever they are. (applause) So long as training camps operate, so long as nations harbor terrorists, freedom is at risk. And America and our allies must not, and will not, allow it.......My hope is that all nations will heed our call, and eliminate the terrorist parasites who threaten their countries and our own....But some governments will be timid in the face of terror. And make no mistake about it: If they do not act, America will. (Applause.) " ( George W. Bush, 2002 State of The Union Address )
Just saying.....it's only logical and reasonable.
posted by troutfishing at 3:59 AM on September 23, 2004
I think it's groovy.
But to get back to the main point of the thread :
GEORGE W. BUSH'S LOGIC
By his own logic - from his proven associations with known terrorists, George W. Bush is duty bound to arrest himself and - indeed - much of his family as well (the twins are probably innocent, but Laura...who knows?).
1) : Those who associate with terrorists are like terrorists themselves (proposition advanced by George W. Bush in various speeches.)
2) : George W. Bush has associated with - and/or his administration has consciously allowed into the United States - known terrorists.
3) : George W. Bush, by his own logic, is thus like a terrorist and so is bound, by his vows to the United States and to the American People, to discharge the duties and obligations he has been entrusted with as President......
To arrest himself and to prosecute himself to the harshest extent of the law.
He probably should strip himself of all legal rights and place himself in Guantanamo, under protective surveillance, to make sure he doesn't repeat the offense - of associating with and enabling known terrorists and so endangering the American people. He probably should also torture himself a bit, to see what he knows, because his publicly known associations could be just the tip of the iceberg.
As he himself noted, anyone who would associate with terrorists who make it their business to blow up innocent men, women, and children is morally suspect, and so the need to protect the American people would supercede his individual rights.
This is really quite urgent : he has associated with known terrorists and also has access to nuclear devices. Mr. Bush needs to send a DELTA FORCE team in to bust his ass, pronto - we're all at risk.
"....tens of thousands of trained terrorists are still at large. These enemies view the entire world as a battlefield, and we must pursue them wherever they are. (applause) So long as training camps operate, so long as nations harbor terrorists, freedom is at risk. And America and our allies must not, and will not, allow it.......My hope is that all nations will heed our call, and eliminate the terrorist parasites who threaten their countries and our own....But some governments will be timid in the face of terror. And make no mistake about it: If they do not act, America will. (Applause.) " ( George W. Bush, 2002 State of The Union Address )
Just saying.....it's only logical and reasonable.
posted by troutfishing at 3:59 AM on September 23, 2004
Stare at those huge blocks of text as they scroll by : strange, random associations - artifacts of the stacked text - pop out.
You're right... it's eerie. Reminds of a scene in "A Beautiful Mind," no?
posted by Krrrlson at 9:51 PM on September 23, 2004
You're right... it's eerie. Reminds of a scene in "A Beautiful Mind," no?
posted by Krrrlson at 9:51 PM on September 23, 2004
Krrrlson - Yes. It's weirdly compelling. But I think the text needs to be a Presidential Address for fullest effect.
Either party's would do, I'd guess.
posted by troutfishing at 7:56 AM on September 24, 2004
Either party's would do, I'd guess.
posted by troutfishing at 7:56 AM on September 24, 2004
« Older Anglo-Sikh Heritage | I Find Solace in Humor. You? Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Where have I read about this before? :-)
posted by nofundy at 4:59 AM on September 22, 2004