Farewell to another free lunch...
March 27, 2001 4:50 PM Subscribe
posted by owillis at 4:59 PM on March 27, 2001
(I've never really had much problem getting a baseball stream, actually, even during the post-season. The advantage of a mono, AM broadcast, I suppose: you can get decent results for not much bandwidth.)
And I hope, at least, that some of that $20million goes into the pockets of the people who thought it would be cool to use live streaming a few years ago. Because it was such a classic case of the bottom-up development that the web does well: the "coolness" of a local producer getting thank-you emails from across the globe so obviously preceded the kind of stultefying business projections that would have happened had the MLB considered it in 1997.
posted by holgate at 5:21 PM on March 27, 2001
Frankly, I couldn't be more excited. As a long-time, hard-core, third-generation (at least!) Yankee fan who does not live in New York, I'm psyched!
posted by fooljay at 5:23 PM on March 27, 2001
posted by litlnemo at 5:38 PM on March 27, 2001
posted by ParisParamus at 5:56 PM on March 27, 2001
Now both the NBA and MLB are exclusive to RealNetworks. It's just a matter of time, Owillis.
posted by jragon at 7:23 PM on March 27, 2001
customized video highlights of each game, with video archives of every pitch from every game."
Okay, now THAT is just too damn cool. Finally, someone is providing content I won't mind paying for. The only thing that beats listening to baseball on the radio is having every pitch at your fingertips. I'm pumped!
posted by apollo at 7:29 PM on March 27, 2001
posted by holgate at 7:30 PM on March 27, 2001
AFRTS came back on the air a few months ago! They decided it would be a waste of money to put satellite receiving equipment on every single ship out there, so they went back to shortwave. Check out the frequency list (all USB) and the schedule.
And speaking of actual radio, most baseball teams with meaningful national followings are on 50,000-watt AM powerhouses that reach half the country at night. That's not going to change. Combine that with the fact that listening to far-off stations at night is just so damn cool, and that's a significant chunk of the potential audience gone right there. But then, there are a lot of total baseball fanatics out there...
BTW, does this mean radio stations will now be forced to take their live audio streams down whenever a baseball game is on?
posted by aaron at 8:28 PM on March 27, 2001
posted by owillis at 9:22 PM on March 27, 2001
And I'm not even a Cubs fan!
I think it's kind of sad. While some standardization is nice, the sites had a bit more of a local flavor.
Funny: just yesterday I was thinking about how nice it'd be to listen to the Sox games when I'm at work, over the net. Not anymore. I'll bring in a radio instead.
posted by hijinx at 11:21 AM on March 28, 2001
posted by fooljay at 11:38 AM on March 28, 2001
« Older Survivor: Monster Island | When Headlines Go (Nearly) Right Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
It was inevitable, of course. But it's not as if these local stations don't already saturate their commentary with commercials, and Broadcast.com's packaging added a few of their own... but a sign that the days of innovation are giving way to central control and consolidation.
posted by holgate at 4:56 PM on March 27, 2001