Watchwomen
June 8, 2009 5:45 PM   Subscribe

Watchwomen. A burlesque tribute to the Watchmen by the Peek-A-Boo Revue (probably NSFW). [Via]
posted by homunculus (36 comments total) 6 users marked this as a favorite
 
I'm not sure whether I'm relived or disappointed that that's the only use of the "Watchmen porn" tag on Monsters and Rockets...
posted by JoanArkham at 6:03 PM on June 8, 2009


Who Watches The Watchwomen?

I don't think you want me to answer that question.
posted by Joe Beese at 6:05 PM on June 8, 2009


The animation at the beginning that exclaims "Let's nerd the fuck out!" pretty much sums that up beautifully.
posted by middleclasstool at 6:07 PM on June 8, 2009


Burlesque Dr. Manhattan is less nude than regular Dr. Manhattan? Come on, burlesque people--go big or go home.
posted by The Tensor at 6:16 PM on June 8, 2009 [6 favorites]


same as in town.
posted by Lipstick Thespian at 6:22 PM on June 8, 2009


ummmmm...where was the blue penis...?

thanks for the link... I'll send it on to the kid and zack....
posted by HuronBob at 6:34 PM on June 8, 2009


"do you think I'd tell you my plans if I thought you could stop me? I came in my pants five minutes ago!"

Ahem.

Sorry.
posted by Artw at 6:35 PM on June 8, 2009 [1 favorite]


I'm thinking that ain't actually Goblin's original "Suspiria". Anyone know whose cover it is?
posted by GeekAnimator at 6:39 PM on June 8, 2009


The number of Watchmen FPPs on Metafilter has surpassed the number of Harry Potter ones. Twelve since the movie adaptation was announced.

Can we just make a subsection of Metafilter for all of this comic/fantasy stuff? I'm not hatin', I'm just sayin'.
posted by inoculatedcities at 6:47 PM on June 8, 2009


uh, wow.
posted by empath at 6:50 PM on June 8, 2009


You ever look at a metafilter link, and think, man I really need to share this with someone and then realize that the only place you can think of that would appreciate it is metafilter?
posted by empath at 6:53 PM on June 8, 2009 [9 favorites]


I must be one of the few people around that finds burlesque usually to be a letdown and in turn uninteresting.
posted by P.o.B. at 7:00 PM on June 8, 2009 [4 favorites]


Dr. Manhattan needs more colloidal silver in her diet if she wants to carry the part. Also, the dancers didn't seem to be having much fun (except for la Comédienne, perhaps). I thought was half the draw of burlesque was that the dancers have fun performing.
posted by Decimask at 7:01 PM on June 8, 2009


Yeah, another meh here. They all seemed very stiff and wooden, I kept thinking to myself maybe this is someones friend's project? Sorry, just didn't entertain or titillate me. But, to each their own.
posted by Antidisestablishmentarianist at 7:30 PM on June 8, 2009


@P.o.B. I totally agree. I think the re-emergence of burlesque is a fascinating cultural phenomenon, but find it totally uninteresting as a form of entertaining.
posted by dbarefoot at 7:30 PM on June 8, 2009


That was ... surprisingly boring, given what it was. Who knew burlesque could involve so much pretentiousness and so little nakedness?
posted by jacquilynne at 7:41 PM on June 8, 2009 [2 favorites]


On one hand, this was monumentally disappointing

On the other hand, nice costumes!
posted by jtron at 7:48 PM on June 8, 2009 [1 favorite]


Wow, I'm pretty sure that any decent high-school film club could do better (OK maybe they'd need a little help from the drama kids).
posted by oddman at 8:18 PM on June 8, 2009


I once saw someone use the term "indie-hot." So mean, but so right. Sexuality is something you either have or you don't. You can't sort of half-assedly play at it, wink at it, or "but I'm not a stripper, ew! Those girls are gross and poor!" at it.
posted by drjimmy11 at 8:20 PM on June 8, 2009


Burlesque Dr. Manhattan is less nude than regular Dr. Manhattan?

It was crying out for a blue vagina. And yet, there was none.
posted by vibrotronica at 8:21 PM on June 8, 2009


Laughably bad music to accompany utterly disinterested performers.
posted by Scoo at 8:40 PM on June 8, 2009


This was pretty bad. I'd rather see a roller derby tribute to Watchmen.
posted by MegoSteve at 8:49 PM on June 8, 2009 [6 favorites]


I wouldn't say they were disinterested; they were probably keeping serious faces for effect. It can be hard to *not* crack up.

(and let's not get into the ol' "burlesque = fancy stripping" canard again.)
posted by divabat at 9:04 PM on June 8, 2009 [1 favorite]


That was bad. Not even funny bad. Just bad. And I am not a Watchman fan.



Just bad.
posted by paddysat at 9:14 PM on June 8, 2009


This cake has way too much cheese in it.
posted by loquacious at 9:27 PM on June 8, 2009


That was bad. Not even funny bad. Just bad.

I guess it was slightly better than 300. Maybe.

Oh, you meant the revue.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 9:38 PM on June 8, 2009


let's not get into the ol' "burlesque = fancy stripping" canard again.

I thought stripping was just postmodern burlesque, actually.
posted by rokusan at 10:22 PM on June 8, 2009 [3 favorites]


It's like drag, but with real ladies!
posted by Artw at 10:39 PM on June 8, 2009 [3 favorites]


Couldn't make it to the end which, considering a) It's Watchmany b) The ladeez I'm actually pretty shocked by.

I think Alan Moore's Curse On Watchmen missed its target...
posted by fearfulsymmetry at 1:21 AM on June 9, 2009


I really expected "Dr. Manhattan" to be wearing a big old blue floppy strap on.

Did anyone else notice that in the movie he always had underwear on in the love scenes? Totally nude otherwise. I figure it was to avoid an nc-17?
posted by idiopath at 2:48 AM on June 9, 2009


The robot strippers were very nice, but I was hoping for humans.
posted by tommasz at 4:14 AM on June 9, 2009


WTF internet.... W.T.F.
posted by Mastercheddaar at 5:56 AM on June 9, 2009


MegoSteve: "...a roller derby tribute to Watchmen."

Geez, I'd never intended it as such, but my boutfit is kinda Dr. Manhattan-y. Maybe I should change my name to "Dr. ManHittin'"?
posted by nicepersonality at 6:18 AM on June 9, 2009


I guess it was slightly better than 300. Maybe.

Wait, there's a burlesque of 300? Oh, no girls?
posted by From Bklyn at 6:45 AM on June 9, 2009


Well, looks like the hipsters have discovered Rule 63. There's a whole LJ comm devoted to Rule 63 Watchmen, of course.
posted by Halloween Jack at 8:10 AM on June 9, 2009




« Older Everything Frankenstein   |   Chuck Lorre Productions vanity cards. Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments