Builder.com cosmetically improved?
May 23, 2000 8:30 AM Subscribe
Builder.com cosmetically improved? Builder.com refines their site with a better homepage and category pages... but as far as I can see, no change to the actual article layouts themselves. What do you think - anyone read Builder.com anymore?
Hey Builder.com. Your fonts are
No, really. I can't beleive that sites are resorting to such small fonts in their re-designs. What's wrong with letting the end user choose the font size via the browser preferences? I mean, that's what the preferences are there for.
posted by camworld at 9:58 AM on May 23, 2000
No, really. I can't beleive that sites are resorting to such small fonts in their re-designs. What's wrong with letting the end user choose the font size via the browser preferences? I mean, that's what the preferences are there for.
posted by camworld at 9:58 AM on May 23, 2000
Yeah funny thing I actually was there today and happened upon the redesign. I guess they want to be in on the redesign gig that everyone else is on.
posted by neo452 at 3:35 PM on May 23, 2000
posted by neo452 at 3:35 PM on May 23, 2000
Yeah, builder.com is usually 3 - 4 months behind anything going on, unless they are trying to hype some crappy new commercial product. This design is somewhat better than before, but so what? Too much fluff.
posted by amphgobb at 1:57 AM on May 24, 2000
posted by amphgobb at 1:57 AM on May 24, 2000
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by tiaka at 8:38 AM on May 23, 2000