Reports on Fukushima radiation.
May 30, 2012 11:41 AM Subscribe
"Fukushima’s doses tallied" A year after the disaster, reports are being filed that detail the risks presented to citizens. While not wholey innocuous, WHO limits risk to one town's infants, it certainly does not appear to be catastrophic. There has been distrust before of official estimates. This the question, with the massive amounts of information available how easy is it to simply find supporting opinions and label and dissent "untrustworthy?"
This post was deleted for the following reason: Heya, maybe rework this a little and repost tomorrow without the ending-your-post-with-a-rhetorical-or-not-question thing going on? -- cortex
« Older These Colors Don't Run | What happens when your "comprehensive" map...... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments