HomeFront (sorta like StormFront, but in an apron and with chafed nipples)
October 17, 2009 4:48 AM   Subscribe

HomeFront - A publication for the Racially Conscious Home & Family. "Hate speech" legislation - of all the 'paths to hell are paved with good intentions' pieces of feel-good policy making, it's the king of the dung heap. The sincerity of its advocates just seeps like treacle, but the glazed expressions giveaway the fact there's not a whole lot of thinking going on. "Misogyny" and "homophobia" are old hat. "Islamophobia" and "islamofascism" are the new black. Or so the rumblings in the bowels of the UN tell us. But all of this is besides the point. My opinion is entirely selfish - criminalising "hate speech" would deprive the 'net of most of its high comedy.

Women for Aryan Unity are not new - in fact they are celebrating their 20th birthday. These are proud women that like to refer to themselves as "Valkyries" and the very future of the white race rests in their hands. Or wombs.

They are not, but the glossy colour journal HomeFront is.

"Banality of evil" ? Well, not in the Eichmann sense. "Banal" ? Certainly - just look at the contents page. "Evil" ? In the sense that willful and deliberate stupidity is evil, definitely yes.

Amazing stuff. The whole back catalog is available for download too.
posted by felch (11 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: What you're linking to here needs to be much presented much more carefully. A NSFW at least, possibly much more. -- vacapinta



 
I think white power websites should get a NSFW tag. Yeah, interesting. Whatever. But even a second of computer-mediated-interaction with a fucking *server* touched by those people makes me want to puke. Don't they exist in the google cache? Back in a sec, I'm going to wipe my screen and keyboard with alchohol, hang on . . .

OK, back.

Anyway, there's already a Homefront magazine without the white power pretensions, I believe. (It's Canadian, so it's probably without any pretensions.)

So let's hope a cease and desist is on its way.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:56 AM on October 17, 2009 [1 favorite]


I don't think this belongs here.
posted by anotherpanacea at 4:56 AM on October 17, 2009 [2 favorites]


Well, you sure went for a big splash with your first post.

And I guess it segues from the "Kodak moments with the Wehrmacht" post preceding it.

But... eww. Flagged.
posted by Joe Beese at 5:03 AM on October 17, 2009


3... 2... 1...
posted by flapjax at midnite at 5:03 AM on October 17, 2009


no
posted by pyramid termite at 5:05 AM on October 17, 2009



Of course it belongs here, I would rather have "them" in the light than not knowing about them. The latest issue was fascinating; a whole perspective on strip clubs with racial hatred while tossing in equal amounts spelling and grammar mistakes.


I would have to agree this post in particular should have the tag: NSFW. If there is another tag for flaming nut-job hatred, then apply it as well.
posted by fluffycreature at 5:17 AM on October 17, 2009


Strawberry-rhubarb pie?

Potato & leek soup?

When Aryan dad gets home, he'll surely take a dim view of all this promiscuous ingredient mixing.
posted by felix betachat at 5:34 AM on October 17, 2009


She was a woman who was deeply rooted in eugenics and took to heart what Hitler wanted to do: Produce and Elite race of Aryans.

Gold.
posted by fleetmouse at 5:38 AM on October 17, 2009


Interesting to see Margaret Sanger in her context of eugenics pioneer.
posted by Obscure Reference at 5:39 AM on October 17, 2009


I wasn't aware 'Islam' was a race.
posted by mattholomew at 6:22 AM on October 17, 2009


Also, white power websites should definitely get an NSFW tag.
posted by mattholomew at 6:29 AM on October 17, 2009


« Older Violence, death, mud, insanity.   |   The Guardian's Review of the Decade. Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments