I remember being a youngish lad in college and picking up "The Female Man" because it looked like like another Sci-Fi book. It absolutely blew me away. I was amazed. Amazed to the point that almost 40 years later I still have that paperback copy and could walk into my room and put my hand on it in 30 seconds.
I was, perhaps naively, surprised that it didn't get the heaps of praise I thought it deserved. After all, isn't the best speculative fiction about exploring different idea and viewpoints? posted by cccorlew at 11:51 AM on April 29, 2011 [3 favorites]
After all, isn't the best speculative fiction about exploring different idea and viewpoints?
Some might argue that Russ (along with others like Delany, LeGuin, Varley, Ellison, and Disch (to name just the Americans) helped re-shape the field to be that way, after it had mostly been about tough men and their nifty rocket ships for several decades before that. posted by aught at 12:01 PM on April 29, 2011 [11 favorites]
NOOOOO, fucking no. Goddamn it. She was fucking brilliant, a voice that guided and led me and shaped how I see the world since I was 12 years old and stumbled upon a short story she'd written about vampires and bloody fucking hell, death, damn you. posted by jokeefe at 12:09 PM on April 29, 2011 [2 favorites]
If you've never read her nonfiction -- it has a sharp-edged angry brilliance to it, and at the same time an undeniable crackle of humor. Her acerbic pillory of gothics : "Someone Is Trying To Kill Me, And I Think It's My Husband" Her writings on worlds without men before Tiptree and Russ herself had the audacity to say, "worlds without men, that might be pretty fine, actually."
And, of course, "How to Suppress Women's Writing." It is a thing of joy that I still bring out when I hear women writers excluded from the canon by well-meaning men who don't mean anything by it (it's just that Austen is too romancey, or Emily Bronte is too emo). posted by Jeanne at 12:15 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
I was, perhaps naively, surprised that it didn't get the heaps of praise I thought it deserved. After all, isn't the best speculative fiction about exploring different idea and viewpoints?
I'm not sure about your premise; TFM was on the shortlist for the Best Novel Nebula along with other worthy contenders like Samuel Delany's Dhalgren. The winner was Joe Haldeman's The Forever War. One could construct an argument, perhaps, that Russ or Delany deserved to win but it would be just that; an argument. Because The Forever War is rightly considered one of the foremost classics of the genre.
TFM is widely praised and considered at the forefront, if not the progenitor of feminist science fiction. It couldn't really be praised more highly. It's true it didn't make the Hugo ballot. But anyone who thinks the Hugo ballot is consistently representative of the absolute best science fiction is just begging for disappointment. Many books which deserve to make the ballot do not, and some books which do make the ballot do not deserve to be there.
In any case, Russ was a giant and the genre is less without her. posted by Justinian at 12:20 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
I am. I well remember how viciously the book was attacked at the time, and how condescending even most of the favorable reviews were. The world wasn't ready for it, and it helped create the climate in which it can be forgotten how high a hill she had to climb. posted by languagehat at 12:32 PM on April 29, 2011 [6 favorites]
Oh, damn it! I loved her writing, especially her less well-known stint as reviewer for Fantasy and Science Fiction.
A series of strokes, losing more and more of yourself, is a horrible way to go, especially for such a whip smart person. Damn it. posted by maudlin at 12:32 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
I am. I well remember how viciously the book was attacked at the time, and how condescending even most of the favorable reviews were.
Well since I was 1 month old at the time and thus my recollection of events is somewhat murky, I will bow to the memories of old more experienced readers and assume this is one of those books whose recognition grows over time. Because Russ, Wilhelm, and Tiptree and basically the equivalents of Heinlein, Asimov, and Clarke for feminist SF. But in a lot of ways that says even more about a novel's power than when a book is met with wdespread praise right out of the gate. posted by Justinian at 12:40 PM on April 29, 2011
"This too shall pass. All good things must come to an end. Take my life but don't take away the meaning of my life."
My cherished writers' deaths always hit me hard, for some stupid reason, even though they are strangers and even when they have lived a full life.
It feels wrong to leave a period for a master of the fully punctuated sentence, but I don't know what else to say, except that I will miss her voice. posted by anotherpanacea at 12:51 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
I read "When It Changed" after I'd read "Houston, Houston, Do You Read?", and so it didn't have quite the same impact that the Tiptree story did for me, but in a way it built on Tiptree's story in my mind; by addressing the same subject (albeit in a much different way), it made the subject--the implications and possibilities of a world without men--as legitimate a subject for science fiction as a world with starships or cyborgs or genetic engineering. Pretty powerful stuff for a kid just entering adolescence.
There's a long passage in The Female Man where the character Jeanine, after a long struggle for meaning in her life, suddenly agrees to marry her (rather awful) boyfriend, and Russ ends this sequence with one sharp concluding sentence which slaps the rest of the long sentences which precede it in the face: "And there, but for the grace of god, go I."
Radegunde, the medieval Abbess in Souls, who in the face of a Viking invasion tells her people calmly that "God protects our souls, not our bodies."
A minor story of hers which I read when I was 11 or 12, in one of my father's collections of Best Science Fiction (from Analog? something), which was about vampires. But not just vampires: it was the most swooning experience of prose I had yet had; her style was just dazzling and I'd never read anything like it, so quick and nimble. One sentence, which impressed the hell out of me at the time, and which I still remember (one of the main protaganists has been visited by the vampire in the night): "In the dim light her hands were black with blood." Words of one syllable. A perfect rhythm and rise and fall, alliterative without being pushy about it, and visual as all get out. It's harder than it looks, you know?
The very knotty and difficult meditations on Christianity in We Who Are About To. And what a bleak shiver of a book that is. posted by jokeefe at 12:52 PM on April 29, 2011 [6 favorites]
That The Female Man and How to Suppress Women's Writing helped shape the writer and artist I am today is a paltry tribute to a hero of women in literature.
I'd never heard of her, until a few weeks ago when I picked up The Female Man on a whim from the library. There's a chapter in there which suggests her work was quite strongly attacked.
What made me saddest was the suggestion in the final chapter that it would be good if a future reader couldn't understand the book. The fact that it's still relevant is sad. posted by Infinite Jest at 12:55 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
Okay, and one last quote (if I can call things drawn from memory and perhaps not perfectly accurate quotes): When somebody once asked if she was dedicated to the women's movement, she said no, the women's movement was dedicated to her, and she wasn't going to forget it.
Goodbye Joanna. My world is so much richer for your work.
Well since I was 1 month old at the time and thus my recollection of events is somewhat murky, I will bow to the memories of old more experienced readers and assume this is one of those books whose recognition grows over time. Because Russ, Wilhelm, and Tiptree and basically the equivalents of Heinlein, Asimov, and Clarke for feminist SF. But in a lot of ways that says even more about a novel's power than when a book is met with wdespread praise right out of the gate.
I remember how viciously this book was attacked as recently as the mid-nineties, on the feminist SF list serv, no less. If my memory serves me well, SM Stirling in particular had some unpleasant things to say about it. Many women on the list serv at the time viewed it as "too angry", "too strident" and all the various things which Russ predicts will be the books reception in the last segment.
Oh, and this--the thing I admire most of all about Joanna Russ is that, unlike some feminist SF writers, she backed down from and apologized for instances of racism and transphobia that appear in her books. The Female Man, for example, has a long passage which is at best clueless about trans women and at worst transphobic; her novel The Two of Them, which has some really terrific and sad parts, takes place on Oppressive Muslim Planet. In each case, she owned what she'd written and apologized for what was written in ignorance and bias.
It's not that her books are angry; it's that they are bitter and sad and adult in a way that not a lot of science fiction is (even science fiction that I like a lot). "The Second Inquisition" for example. That's a sad, sad story if you're looking for one. posted by Frowner at 2:04 PM on April 29, 2011 [6 favorites]
Reading "When It Changed", and then Harlan Ellison's infinitely tool-ish introduction to same in Again, Dangerous Visions tells you everything you need to know about the contemporary attitudes Russ was fighting against. Joanna Russ - "she looks great in a bikini."
Later in the same collection, if I wasn't hallucinating, is Piers Anthony's tale of a world where naked women are bred as milk cows. According to the author's note, it's a parable about the evils of factory farming.
Oh how sad I am to read this. She was one of my favorite SF authors. RIP, lady! posted by Lynsey at 2:25 PM on April 29, 2011
How To Suppress Women's Writing explicitly named patterns that I was seeing, but hadn't yet consciously articulated, in my own research on business, science, and sport history. "In this book she's talking only about writing and getting published, but the same thing happens in this other field...and over there in that field too...and over there...and over there...and... Holy shit, where hasn't this happened?"
Particularly enjoyed Picnic on Paradise but all her fiction is good. posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 2:30 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
Later in the same collection, if I wasn't hallucinating, is Piers Anthony's tale of a world where naked women are bred as milk cows. According to the author's note, it's a parable about the evils of factory farming.
You are not hallucinating. I remember that story, too. posted by maudlin at 2:31 PM on April 29, 2011
Ugh. Me as well. posted by jokeefe at 2:36 PM on April 29, 2011
Reading "When It Changed", and then Harlan Ellison's infinitely tool-ish introduction to same in Again, Dangerous Visions tells you everything you need to know about the contemporary attitudes Russ was fighting against. Joanna Russ - "she looks great in a bikini."
And sadly, things haven't changed a great deal since. posted by jokeefe at 2:37 PM on April 29, 2011
.
No, I refuse to believe it! Her critical and fictional work has meant a great deal to me, and she will be sorely missed. posted by MidSouthern Mouth at 2:52 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
I would like to add an appreciation for her Ace Special, And Chaos Died, which was her first critical and commercial success. Among many other things, it was an imaginative treatment of what the sudden experience of telepathy would be like.
Joanna Russ once lived and taught in Seattle. And, as she was once a reviewer for The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction -- her review of Jack Vance's Emphyrio was a classic in its concision -- she must have gotten a ton of paperbacks sent her way everafter. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, it was always a delight to open a used science fiction paperback at Horizon Books on 15th East to find her Ex Libris pasted in it. I have an R.A. Lafferty novel somewhere with one of those silver and black bookplates with her name and address on its title page. posted by y2karl at 2:53 PM on April 29, 2011 [7 favorites]
Magic Mamas, Trembling Sisters, Puritans and Perverts and How to Suppress Women's Writing had a huge effect on me. I remember reading this analysis of a particular kind of toxic interaction that I had noticed but could not describe, and I was floored. She was an excellent writer with an incredibly sharp critical eye. No wonder she was never as popular as she deserved. posted by GenjiandProust at 3:02 PM on April 29, 2011 [4 favorites]
Now I will never write her a fan letter! Now she will never by some miracle speak at WisCon during a year I can attend! Now I can never imagine meeting her by some happy coincidence! Now when I reread her books and hear that wry, clever voice which has become so familiar...now I have to remember that she is gone.
Ah, it's a hell of a thing. It's so hard to think of her being dead when I can instantly conjure up so many images from her work, sharp and clear.
She and Orwell are the only authors where I've read just about everything they've published, right down to the odds and ends of reviews and letters. posted by Frowner at 3:04 PM on April 29, 2011 [2 favorites]
The Piers Anthony story mentioned above is called "In the Barn" and was published in Again, Dangerous Visions and in Anthony's anthology Anthonology. posted by Crabby Appleton at 3:21 PM on April 29, 2011
I will add to the chorus that reading When it Changed is one of those events that permanently changed me in ways I will never be able to undo.
And while anyone's death is bad news, remember that she was 74 years old, and lots of people both more and less talented don't make it that far. I think at this point as a fan I think celebrating her life and work is probably more appropriate than mourning. posted by localroger at 4:49 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
If my memory serves me well, SM Stirling in particular had some unpleasant things to say about it.
Ah. SM Stirling used to be able to tell a good story (he appears to have forgotten) but he's... well, he's SM Stirling. It's like pointing to something John Ringo or John C. Wright said; shooting fish in a barrel. posted by Justinian at 5:21 PM on April 29, 2011
.
Love her stuff, loved it as a kid and went out of my way to track it down later. posted by mwhybark at 5:29 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
Ah. SM Stirling used to be able to tell a good story (he appears to have forgotten) but he's... well, he's SM Stirling. It's like pointing to something John Ringo or John C. Wright said; shooting fish in a barrel.
But you see, he was posting on a feminist SF listserv - the feminist SF listserv, in fact - where he was taken surprisingly seriously. Feminist SF has gotten a lot stroppier since then.
And while anyone's death is bad news, remember that she was 74 years old, and lots of people both more and less talented don't make it that far. I think at this point as a fan I think celebrating her life and work is probably more appropriate than mourning.
It may be "more appropriate", but it doesn't even touch how sad I feel. Why? Don't know. There's hardly another author in the world whose death I'd feel so strongly about; I'm not much of a one for crying about people you didn't actually know. posted by Frowner at 5:50 PM on April 29, 2011 [2 favorites]
The Female Man is one of the 10 or so books I re-read every few years. Thank you, Joanna, for that and everything else. posted by minervous at 7:28 PM on April 29, 2011 [1 favorite]
A minor story of hers which I read when I was 11 or 12, in one of my father's collections of Best Science Fiction (from Analog? something), which was about vampires. But not just vampires: it was the most swooning experience of prose I had yet had; her style was just dazzling and I'd never read anything like it, so quick and nimble.
Yeah, jokeefe, I loved that story, "My Dear Emily." Such a lush representation of vampires. She even noted that she would die if Hammer made a film of it. If only.
She turned me on the feminist scifi, which fortunately is still going strong today.
I am torn between feeling a sense of panic and a joy that she lived as long as she did. Reading "A Few Things I Know About Whileaway" when I was sixteen was a very transformative experience for me. Now, I was raised well by good feminist Nordics, but feminism was still a somewhat abstract thing for me. Putting it into the context of science fiction, which had been my overriding interest in life since I was ten years old helped bring it home. It was a moment of "oh yeah!" for me. Having feminism articulated through the tropes of SF with such skill and imaginativeness opened a door into feminist theory I could enter confidently. Joanna Russ gave me a lot as a person and I'm happy she lived as full and productive life as she did.
My sense of panic comes from the feeling that there's no one else like her out there. That the time of combative feminist SF has passed. I know the reactionary fuckheads are dying too, but there seems to be an endless resupply of them. I hope my feeling is wrong and that out there there are in fact plenty of feminist SF writers pushing the boundaries. There will never be another Joanna Russ, but we still need about ten thousand of her.
A link to one of her stories online, via Making Light. posted by Joe in Australia at 9:49 AM on April 30, 2011
She is absolutely one of the most important writers in my life. I am also sorry to see her go, but so glad we had her voice.
In addition to all her great work mentioned here, I re-read the Adventures of Alyx periodically. I never understood what it would mean to have a real, living, breathing woman at the center of a fantasy story until I read this. It changed the way I read all other types of fantasy, and all other stories about women.
I think the Alyx stories were sometimes considered "lighter", for Russ, but I can't explain how refreshing and, really, mind-blowing it was to see a female fantasy protagonist that was just a clever, complicated, complete person.
Reading How to Suppress Women's Writing today, though much of it is painfully relevant, there is significant practical change (for example, she talks about Vilette, by Charolette Bronte being available in only one edition, expensive and hard cover). Penguin and Oxford World Classics now have inexpensive paperbacks with full scholarly apparatus, for a few bucks.
This isn't to say that work doesn't need to be done. But part of her extensive legacy, is to allow undergrads to read Villette, and that's really important. posted by PinkMoose at 6:16 PM on April 30, 2011 [1 favorite]
I was looking for a review of And Chaos Died and found a critical review by Samuel R. Delany. But also, for what it is worth, I found the book entire. posted by y2karl at 8:54 AM on May 2, 2011 [1 favorite]
If my memory serves me well, SM Stirling in particular had some unpleasant things to say about it.
Heh. That as disposable a writer as Stirling would dismiss Russ's work is pretty amusing, actually.
But you see, he was posting on a feminist SF listserv - the feminist SF listserv, in fact - where he was taken surprisingly seriously. Feminist SF has gotten a lot stroppier since then.
From the bits and pieces of that list that are google-able it looks like they were being polite to his pontificating. posted by aught at 1:48 PM on May 2, 2011
« Older Grandmothers are agitated to the point of singing ... | Alan Wolfson's Canal Street Cr... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by kipmanley at 11:45 AM on April 29, 2011