That's an interesting blog, thanks. posted by joannemullen at 1:42 AM on May 10, 2011
There's a lot of research going into the idea of small, portable nuclear reactors for civilian use - see this Economist article from last December. One company referenced in the article is TerraPower, and one if its investors is Bill Gates. posted by dowcrag at 4:07 AM on May 10, 2011
The portable reactors so far developed suffer from two key shortcomings: to get enough oomph in such a small volume the nuclear fuel must be weapons-grade, and they just don’t produce that much power. Two or three megawatts seems like a lot, until you realize that most of that is heat.
Just what the world needs: more weapons grade plutonium in private hands. posted by three blind mice at 5:04 AM on May 10, 2011
Is there a nuclear reactor design that is not extracting energy from heat?
I think in theory there are ways you can extract electrical energy more directly from various types of radiation (basically photoelectric cells that are designed for higher energy levels, e.g. gamma rays) but I don't know of any practical designs that use this. Even the no-moving-parts reactors for deep space use take advantage of thermocouples.
isn't it just? When I first heard about it I halfway believed it had been made up as a embodiment of all the ridiculousness of the Cold War. posted by Artw at 9:27 AM on May 10, 2011
« Older Canadian photographer Jonathan Hobin's In the Play... | Here Be Monsters.... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by joannemullen at 1:42 AM on May 10, 2011