He disagreed with Ehrlich and Vogt that restrictions on reproduction were the only possible response to overpopulation. Man, he argued, was a positive animal, and creativity and design could solve our problems.posted by muddgirl at 9:26 AM on August 18, 2011 [2 favorites]
Threatening life and evolution are the two deaths, death of the spirit and death of the body. Evolution, in terms of ancient wisdom, is the acquisition of access to the tree of life. This takes us back to the white first horse of the Apocalypse which with its rider set out to conquer the forces that threaten the spirit with death.posted by muddgirl at 9:40 AM on August 18, 2011 [1 favorite]
The Chairman thought Dr Calhoun had not mentioned...I don't think there's any mention of how frequently it was done, but I'd assume that they were just scooped out with the rest of the bedding. No way in hell you could get away with running this experiment these days, of course; animal experimentation laws have come a long way.
pollution and asked what remains the animals left and
how these affected the situation?
Dr Calhoun said that they (the investigators) were not
very sanitary in their husbandry, if that was the kind
of pollution inferred. The environment was cleaned,
most fices and soiled bedding removed, every six
weeks or two months, but nothing was ever sterilized.
He did not consider this necessary in such a closed
system and the mice had better survival than in most
laboratory colonies. Dead bodies were eventually
removed for examinations, but the major pollution
was the excess of living bodies; this was the essential
factor. The pollution was social in that there were too
many interacting elements, exceeding the social
system's capacity for incorporation of new individuals.
Capacities were genetically determined and situationally
modified.
« Older Squirrog, anyone? How about a bullguin?... | Obama calls on Assad to step d... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by curious nu at 8:49 AM on August 18, 2011