But it soon became clear that there were business advantages as well. Like most magazines, The Atavist pays a fee up front when a story arrives in decent shape. Mr. Dobbs called The Atavist’s fee “modest” when compared to the top-tier magazines. “It’s less than you would get either by word rate or total fee rate – unless you’re Michael Lewis,” he said. The big difference is that when the issue comes out, the writer gets roughly half the revenue the story generates. Which means a runaway hit by a mid-level writer, or even a run-of-the-mill piece by a marquee author, has the potential to rack up thousands, or in an extreme case, hundreds of thousands, in revenue for both the publication and the author.Which means, obviously, that The Atavist could making hundreds of thousands of dollars off of converting an article into HTML -- it's ridiculous. Of course, they pay up front which you don't get with just throwing your book up on the kindle store, and they probably do some marketing as well.
Unless you want, y'know, editing, fact-checking, publicity, and some level of signalling for the reader (e.g. if I see a brand I have liked in the past I have the feeling I'm more likely to enjoy subsequent work with the same brand). It seems that The Atavist provides all of this, looking at their website.The signaling thing could be handled by reviews, and not only that but Amazon's star system will let people know whether or not a book is any good. I don't think non-fiction books are fact-checked the same way magazine articles are anyway.
« Older Found via this comment by Concordia on this AskMe,... | Starting with a fresh box of t... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Within 24 hours, with no announcement or promotion of any kind, we already had three sales. This suggests that a decent fraction of the people who run across the online version (a steady trickle even after almost 10 years) immediately check for Amazon availability, and when they see the cheap Kindle version they click "buy." It's really too bad this didn't exist for the original slashdotting.
posted by localroger at 4:52 PM on September 20, 2011 [3 favorites]