rtha - according to this interview (linked above as self-taught "classical" painter), he often uses photos or scenes from movies as inspiration, and the actual pieces start with a rough sketch on acrylic glass. But the cuts look to be free-hand. Somewhere, I thought I read that he got the inspiration to work with tape from seeing friends work on custom paint jobs on cars, taping out their designs, quickly creating the templates for pieces. posted by filthy light thief at 11:15 AM on January 4
man that was really cool! posted by rebent at 11:47 AM on January 4
In any case, it's nice to see somebody really doing street art in a tactile sense, with nothing but their own two hands and some simple tools, as opposed to just wheatpasting a bunch of posters that they made in Photoshop. posted by Strange Interlude at 11:58 AM on January 4
So we're going to completely forget about his murderous past, then, and his attempts to physically destroy America's high tech economic engine and plunge our nation, indeed our world, into economic chaos?
We're just going to ignore all that because now he makes interesting art? Really?
This was a lot neater than I expected. I wish he did his own compositions, since some of the "inspired" ones seem too close to the originals. posted by cjorgensen at 12:12 PM on January 4
"In any case, it's nice to see somebody really doing street art in a tactile sense, with nothing but their own two hands and some simple tools, as opposed to just wheatpasting a bunch of posters that they made in Photoshop."
Except these are obviously traced systematically from photos that have been posterized or had a cut-out filter applied to them- so the same process as the cliched screen print wheat pastes you see everyone and their sister doing. Still, I do like the choice of materials and the stained glass effect of the packing tape. posted by stagewhisper at 12:22 PM on January 4 [1 favorite]
Why put this up on streetlamps? Aren't there other lighted surfaces that would suffice? We need the illumination from street lamps (already too dim) to help keep streets safe. Now, copycats are going to go up poles and cover street lights with their "art", and make them even more dim. Lame. I just don't get that some people who call themselves artists think it is their constitutionally-given right to impose their creativity on everyone else, including vandalizing public property. posted by Vibrissae at 4:26 PM on January 4
Is "back-lit street-art" the same as graffiti with a lamp behind it? posted by ReeMonster at 9:09 PM on January 4
Most graffiti isn't little film noir-inspired portraits. If it was, people might not mind so much. Then again, I'm fond of artistic graffiti, not the hasty scrawls that only say "I was here".
stagewhisper: Except these are obviously traced systematically from photos that have been posterized or had a cut-out filter applied to them
Did you see the first video? Unless the template is washed out, it looks like he does it freehand, no tracing involved.
And I don't imagine there'd be a huge rush of copycats in this field of urban art/defacement. It's easier to steal address labels from the post office and doodle on those than create tape art, shimmy up a light pole, and tape your work up. posted by filthy light thief at 10:41 AM on January 5
« Older This link will create a polar panorama of any Goog... | Finally! The unholy alliance ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by hoyland at 10:54 AM on January 4