Peter Jackson: We’d never intended to do a film while we worked on the case the first four years. HBO had the film part covered. We were just trying to save Damien, who’d become a friend. You get to know the people and before too long you have an emotional connection and it becomes a very personal fight. We presented all of our findings, the new science, the experts, the forensics, the redefining of the case the state presented in the original trial, all that went before the original trial judge, David Burnett, in September, 2008. We all expected this would be the moment when the case would end. We thought the judge might be morally strong enough to do that, but as it turned out, he wasn’t. He threw it all out and said --More current interviews, articles, etc. here.
Walsh: He said it was not compelling.
Jackson: In a way, his words “not compelling” inspired us to do this film. We had very, very compelling evidence, and a state refusing to let it be heard or seen. We always thought if any sensible intelligent person took two or three hours to look at the basic facts of the case, they would always come to the same conclusion. That this was a complete farce and a sham. We needed a way to get the evidence that the judge was blocking from the courtroom, in front of people. And then the thought became a documentary film.
"We would never say that we have proof positive beyond a reasonable doubt that Terry Hobbs did it," said attorney Stephen Braga at a Sundance press conference on Saturday. "But the case is building, and that allows us to go to [district attorney] Scott Ellington and say, 'Can we work with you instead of against you?' And he has indicated that he is receptive to that."posted by scody at 7:10 PM on January 21
« Older People can't decide if he looks more like Tom Crui... | In the 1970s and 1980s, Chicag... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by KokuRyu at 1:21 PM on January 20