Abusing the word "quantum" for bogus scientific cachet... isn't that a little, oh, 2004?
A "quantum jump" can quite rightly be used to describe a large jump because it's the jump that makes it "quantum", not its size.
As for the nonsense in this post, it's nonsense. This is 21st century snake oil salesmanship.
« Older From 1990: A 12 year old, armed with an NES, video... | Nathaniel "Magnificent" Montag... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt