The setting is ultra-real yet reverential. In this ordinary space, an extraordinary woman changed the way Americans ate. Three of her cooking shows were televised in it, amid the utensils, objects and art that made her happy. Where’s the appeal in a soulless, sleek cooking environment with everything tucked out of sight? This exhibit makes you wonder, and the curators say it prompts strangers to share stories with one another as they explore.
It gets even better for Julia-philes. The copper pot collection represented only in outline until it was reunited with Child’s kitchen in 2009 now hangs directly across from where it belonged. Child’s French Legion of Honor medal of 2000 and the 1996 Emmy statuette for “In Julia’s Kitchen With Master Chefs” are displayed nearby. The mystery of an accompanying, cantaloupe-size tea infuser has been solved: It’s a rice-cooking ball, says co-curator and project director Paula Johnson.
When “Julie & Julia” director Nora Ephron came to see the pots’ unveiling, she wrote a check on the spot to help support the museum’s Julia Child efforts. “She loved food, and she loved Julia,” Green says.
at one point Martha Stewart forgot who was standing next to her and started to revert to Imperious Martha StewartThat's a funny moment for sure but I'm not picking up quite that undertone in Martha's question. To be fair, Julia was already in her mid-80s and maybe had no compunctions refusing to do anything she didn't feel like doing, maybe she didn't want to get her hands eggy, maybe she just preferred to observe and converse.
« Older Super Mario Bros. Special occupies a strange place... | A Collector's Weekly article o... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by trip and a half at 12:53 PM on August 14, 2012 [1 favorite]