Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Skin Peptidome of Russian Brown Frog Rana temporariaThe work itself is kind of neat in a really limited way, but is almost half advertisement for the Thermo-Scientific machine the authors bought and honestly the only thing possibly interesting to a layman is the frog milk story. Peptide therapeutics (previously) have all kinds of complications these authors haven't even begun to look at, no toxicity testing on human cell lines, no animal data, no nothing but a short list of peptides with poorly characterized antimicrobial activity to add to the many thousands known.
A nano-HPLC-ESI-OrbiTrap study involving HCD and ETD spectra has been carried out to clarify the composition of the skin peptidome of brown Russian frogs Rana temporaria. This approach allowed determinantion of 76 individual peptides, increasing 3-fold the identified portion of the peptidome in comparison to that obtained earlier with FTICR MS. A search for the new bradykinin related peptides (BRPs) was carried out by reconstructing mass chromatograms based on the ion current of characteristic b- and y-ions. Several peptides were reported in the secretion of R. temporaria for the first time. The overall antibacterial activity of the skin secretion in general and of one individual peptide (Brevinin 1Tb) was determined using PMEU Spectrion (Portable Microbe Enrichment Unit) technology. The inhibitory effects of these peptides on Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica Serovar typhimutium were equal in scale to that reported for some antibiotics.
"They analyzed the resulting milky frog goo and found a complex cocktail containing chunks of proteins called peptides."LOL. Even if we can't expect science journalists to have paid attention in their high school science classes, much less actually have any meaningful familiarity with the science they cover, we can at least expect them to check wikipedia rather than sketchy linkbait? These are not chunks of proteins, they are complete peptides and milk was entirely uninvolved in anything the authors actually did. For fucks sake this guy can't even tell that none of the species mentioned in the article as being affected by these peptides are Eukaryotic much less fungal. Interestingly, the frog is apparently known to produce antifungal peptides, but that activity was not searched for here.
« Older Youtube user CHDanhauser,... | Hammerpoint Interactive releas... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
It would be cool to read further into the article, but I just had to stop and picture a frog with teeth and claws, and now my mind is stuck in a loop.
posted by Greg Nog at 1:21 PM on December 19, 2012 [4 favorites]