When people talk about “the whole nine yards,” just what are they talking about? For decades the answer to that question has been the Bigfoot of word origins...But now two researchers using high-powered database search tools have delivered a confident “none of the above,” supported by a surprise twist: Before we were going the whole nine yards, it turns out, we were only going six.posted by anazgnos (53 comments total) 18 users marked this as a favorite(SLNYT)
numerical phrase inflationThis ... this is a thing? This is amazing. This one goes to twelve.
But then Mr. Shapiro, searching in Chronicling America, a Library of Congress database of pre-1923 newspapers, found two 1912 articles in The Mount Vernon Signal in Kentucky promising to “give” or “tell” the “whole six yards” of a story.It seems to be working on the same meaning as "spin a yarn", in that stories are measured in physical length, somehow proportionate to their length in time or how convoluted they are. So we have in our minds a long piece of thread signifying the plot of the tale told at length. Some suggest there's a direct connection, in that spinners would tell tales to each other while they spun, with the length of thread growing with the tale. We might even take a step from that and imagine weavers telling each other stories, with the yards of cloth piling up as the tale reached its height. Were it not that weavers often worked alone, or in the din of factories, it would be an interesting lead. Nor do I know how long it would take a weaver to make six yards of cloth, and I guess those tales would have been rather long.And then they write that off for some reason. Huh. Newspapers are about a square yard, right? And columns are measured in inches? Seems like there may be something to that.
« Older If you've ever had a door or drawer that sticks du... | It's been just over eight year... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Atreides at 1:41 PM on January 15 [2 favorites]